575
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

A Systemic Functional Linguistics Approach to Analyzing White Supremacist and Conspiratorial Discourse on YouTube

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Allington, D., Buarque, B. L., & Barker Flores, D. (2021). Antisemitic conspiracy fantasy in the age of digital media: Three ‘conspiracy theorists’ and their YouTube audiences. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 30(1), 78–102. doi:10.1177/0963947020971997
  • Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. Beverely Hills, California: Sage.
  • Anthony, L. A. (2014). Computer software. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University.
  • Asakitikpi, A. O., & Gadzikwa, J. (2020). A critical discourse analysis of online Youtube news coverage of South African discourses on Xenophobia in democratic South Africa. Politikon, 47(4), 479–493. doi:10.1080/02589346.2020.1840022
  • Cassam, Quassim(2019). Conspiracy Theories. Cambridge: Polity
  • Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualising mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202. doi:10.1111/comt.12019
  • Culloty, E. (2020). Conspiracy and the epistemological challenges of mediatized conflict. In S. Maltby, B. O’Loughlin, K. Parry, & L. Roselle (Eds.), Spaces of war, war of spaces (pp. 83–102). New York, NY: Bloomsbury, .
  • Daniels, J. (2009). Cyber racism: White supremacy online and the new attack on civil rights. Maryland, MA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Demata, M., Zorzi, V., & Zottola, A. (forthcoming). Critical inquiries into the language of anti-science, post-trutherism, mis/disinformation and alternative media. In M. Demata, V. Zorzi, & A. Zottola (Eds.), Conspiracy theory discourses. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins ix–x .
  • Farkas, J., Schou, J., & Neumayer, C. (2018). Platformed antagonism: Racist discourses on fake Muslim Facebook pages. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(5), 463–480. doi:10.1080/17405904.2018.1450276
  • Finlayson, A. (2020). YouTube and political ideologies: Technology, populism and rhetorical form. Political Studies. doi:10.1177/0032321720934630
  • Fong, A., Roozenbeek, J., Goldwert, D., Rathje, S., & van der Linden, S. (2021). The language of conspiracy: A psychological analysis of speech used by conspiracy theorists and their followers on Twitter. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 606–623. doi:10.1177/1368430220987596
  • Fuchs, C. (2018). “Dear Mr. Neo-Nazi, can you please give me your informed consent so that i can quote your fascist Tweet?”: Questions of social media research ethics in online ideology critique. In G. Meikle (Ed.), The Routledge companion to media and activism (pp.385–394). Abington, Oxfordshire: Routledge .
  • Gillborn, D. (2006). Rethinking white supremacy: Who counts in ‘WhiteWorld.’ Ethnicities, 6(3), 318–340. doi:10.1177/1468796806068323
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London, United Kingdom: Hodder Arnold.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (2008). Working with meaning: Towards an appliable linguistics. In J. Webster (Ed.), Meaning in context: Implementing intelligent applications of language studies (pp.7–23). London, UK: Continuum .
  • Harju, A. (2016). Imagined community and affective alignment in Steve Jobs memorial tributes on YouTube. In S. Gardner & S. Alsop (Eds.), Systemic functional linguistics in the digital age (pp.62–80). Sheffield, United Kingdom: Equinox Publishing .
  • Hokka, J. (2021). PewDiePie, racism and Youtube’s neoliberalist interpretation of freedom of speech. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 27(1), 142–160. doi:10.1177/1354856520938602
  • Inwood, O., & Zappavigna, M. (2021). Ambient affiliation, misinformation and moral panic: Negotiating social bonds in a YouTube internet hoax. Discourse & Communication 15 (3), 1750481321989838.
  • Inwood, O., & Zappavigna, M. (forthcoming). The ID2020 conspiracy theory in YouTube video comments during COVID-19: Bonding around religious, political, and technological discourses. In M. Demata, V. Zorzi, & A. Zottola (Eds.), Conspiracy Theory discourses (pp. 241–266). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins .
  • Knight, N. K. (2010). Laughing our bonds off: Conversational humour in relation to affiliation. (PhD Thesis). University of Sydney, Unpublished.
  • Konkes, C., & Lester, L. (2015). Incomplete Knowledge, Rumour and Truth Seeking. Journalism Studies, 18(7), 826–844. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2015.1089182
  • Kopytowska, M. (2021). Xenophobia, misogyny and rape culture: Targeting women in cyberspace. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 9(1), 76–99. doi:10.1075/jlac.00054.kop
  • Krzyzanowski, M. (2018). Discursive shifts in ethno-nationalist politics: On politicization and mediatization of the “Refugee crisis” in Poland. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16(1–2), 76–96. doi:10.1080/15562948.2017.1317897
  • Krzyzanowski, M., Triandafyllidou, A., & Wodak, R. (2018). the mediatization and the politicization of the “Refugee crisis” in Europe. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16(1–2), 1–14. doi:10.1080/15562948.2017.1353189
  • Lecompte-Van Poucke, M. (2022). ‘You got this!’: A critical discourse analysis of toxic positivity as a discursive construct on Facebook. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 2(1), 100015. doi:10.1016/j.acorp.2022.100015
  • Levy, H. (2020). Grammars of contestation and pluralism: Paulo Freire’s action in Brazil’s periphery and the rise of right-wing discourse on YouTube. International Communication Gazette, 82(5), 474–489. doi:10.1177/1748048520943696
  • Lim, S. S. (2020). Manufacturing hate 4.0: Can media studies rise to the challenge? Television & New Media, 21(6), 602–607. doi:10.1177/1527476420918825
  • Mahl, D., Schäfer, M. S., & Zeng, J. (2022). Conspiracy theories in online environments: An interdisciplinary literature review and agenda for future research. New Media & Society OnlineFirst , 14614448221075759.
  • Makki, M., & Zappavigna, M. (2021). Out-grouping and ambient affiliation in Donald Trump’s tweets about Iran: Exploring the role of negative evaluation in enacting solidarity. Pragmatics 32 (1), 104–130 .
  • Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York,NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2017). Platformed racism: The mediation and circulation of an Australian race-based controversy on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 930–946. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293130
  • Miller, D. T. (2021). Characterizing Qanon: Analysis of YouTube comments presents new conclusions about a popular conservative conspiracy. First Monday. doi:10.5210/fm.v26i2.10168
  • Murthy, D., & Sharma, S. (2019). Visualizing YouTube’s comment space: Online hostility as a networked phenomena. New Media & Society, 21(1), 191–213. doi:10.1177/1461444818792393
  • Panizo-LLedot, A., Torregrosa, J., Bello-Orgaz, G., Thorburn, J., & Camacho, D. (2019). Describing Alt-Right Communities and Their Discourse on Twitter During the 2018 US Mid-term Elections Cherifi, H, Gaito, S, Mendes, J F. F., Moro, E, Rocha, L. M. In International Conference on Complex Networks and Their Applications (pp. 427–439). Cham: Springer.
  • Paolillo, J. C. (2018). The flat earth phenomenon on YouTube. First Monday, 23(12). doi:10.5210/fm.v23i12.8251
  • Rieder, B. (2015). YouTube data tools (Version 1.11). Retrieved from https://tools.digitalmethods.net/netvizz/youtube/
  • Röchert, D., Neubaum, G., Ross, B., & Stieglitz, S. (2022). Caught in a networked collusion? Homogeneity in conspiracy-related discussion networks on YouTube. Information Systems, 103, 101866. doi:10.1016/j.is.2021.101866
  • Shahsavari, S., Holur, P., Wang, T., Tangherlini, T. R., & Roychowdhury, V. (2020). Conspiracy in the time of Corona: Automatic detection of emerging COVID-19 conspiracy theories in social media and the news. Journal of Computational Social Science, 3(2), 279–317. doi:10.1007/s42001-020-00086-5
  • Starbird, K., Arif, A., & Wilson, T. (2019). Disinformation as collaborative work: Surfacing the participatory nature of strategic information operations. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–26. doi:10.1145/3359229
  • Supriadi, N. P., Gunawan, W., & Muniroh, R. D. D. A. (2020). Bullies’ attitudes on Twitter: A forensic linguistics analysis of cyberbullying (Systemic functional linguistics approach). Passage, 8(2), 111–124.
  • Szenes, E. (2021). Neo-Nazi environmentalism: The linguistic construction of ecofascism in a Nordic resistance movement manifesto. Journal for Deradicalization Summer , (27), 146–192.
  • Thelwall, M., Sud, P., & Vis, F. (2012). Commenting on YouTube videos: From Guatemalan rock to el big bang. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 616–629. doi:10.1002/asi.21679
  • Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Wright, M. (2019). YouTube comment suite v1.4.2. Github. https://github.com/mattwright324/youtube-comment-suite
  • Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society, 13(5), 788–806. doi:10.1177/1461444810385097
  • Zappavigna, M. (2018). Searchable talk and social media metadiscourse. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Zappavigna, M. (2021). Ambient affiliation in comments on YouTube videos: Communing around values about ASMR. 外国语, 44(1), 21–40.
  • Zappavigna, M., & Martin, J. R. (2018). # Communing affiliation: Social tagging as a resource for aligning around values in social media. Discourse, Context & Media, 22, 4–12. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2017.08.001

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.