Advanced search
Publication Cover
Drug Delivery Volume 25, 2018 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
6,115
Views
84
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Advanced physical techniques for gene delivery based on membrane perforation

Xiaofan DuKey Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, Institute of Biomedical Analytical Technology and Instrumentation, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of ChinaView further author information
,
Jing WangKey Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, Institute of Biomedical Analytical Technology and Instrumentation, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of ChinaView further author information
,
Quan ZhouKey Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, Institute of Biomedical Analytical Technology and Instrumentation, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of ChinaView further author information
,
Luwei ZhangKey Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, Institute of Biomedical Analytical Technology and Instrumentation, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of ChinaView further author information
,
Sijia WangKey Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, Institute of Biomedical Analytical Technology and Instrumentation, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of ChinaView further author information
,
Zhenxi ZhangKey Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, Institute of Biomedical Analytical Technology and Instrumentation, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of ChinaView further author information
&
Cuiping YaoKey Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, Institute of Biomedical Analytical Technology and Instrumentation, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
 show all
Pages 1516-1525 | Received 12 Apr 2018, Accepted 21 May 2018, Published online: 03 Jul 2018

References

  • Abdalkader R, Kawakami S, Unga J, et al. (2017). The development of mechanically formed stable nanobubbles intended for sonoporation-mediated gene transfection. Drug Delivery 24:320–7.
  • Adams CF, Pickard MR, Chari DM. (2013). Magnetic nanoparticle mediated transfection of neural stem cell suspension cultures is enhanced by applied oscillating magnetic fields. Nanomed: Nanotechnol Biol Med 9:737–41.
  • Akiyama H, Ito A, Kawabe Y, Kamihira M. (2010). Genetically engineered angiogenic cell sheets using magnetic force-based gene delivery and tissue fabrication techniques. Biomaterials 31:1251–9.
  • Al-Dosari MS, Gao X. (2009). Nonviral gene delivery: principle, limitations, and recent progress. Aaps J 11:671–81.
  • Almstätter I, Mykhaylyk O, Settles M, et al. (2015). Characterization of magnetic viral complexes for targeted delivery in oncology. Theranostics 5:667–85.
  • Amy D, Domenico C, Yolmari C, et al. (2011). Evaluation of a novel non-penetrating electrode for use in DNA vaccination. PLoS One 6(4):e19181.
  • Antkowiak M, Torres-Mapa ML, Witts EC, et al. (2013). Fast targeted gene transfection and optogenetic modification of single neurons using femtosecond laser irradiation. Sci Rep 3:3281.
  • Arora S, Gupta G, Singh S, Singh N. (2013). Advances in magnetofection – magnetically guided nucleic acid delivery: a review. Jptrm 1:19–29.
  • Badr YA, Kereim MA, Yehia MA, et al. (2005). Production of fertile transgenic wheat plants by laser micropuncture. Photochem Photobiol Sci 4:803.
  • Bai M, Shen M, Teng Y, et al. (2015). Enhanced therapeutic effect of Adriamycin on multidrug resistant breast cancer by the ABCG2-siRNA loaded polymeric nanoparticles assisted with ultrasound. Oncotarget 6:43779–90.
  • Batabyal S, Kim Y, Mohanty S. (2017). Ultrafast laser-assisted spatially targeted optoporation into cortical axons and retinal cells in the eye. J Biomed Optics 22(6):60504.
  • Bergeron E, Boutopoulos C, Martel R, et al. (2015). Cell-specific optoporation with near-infrared ultrafast laser and functionalized gold nanoparticles. Nanoscale 7:17836–47.
  • Bettan M, Ivanov MA, Mir LM, et al. (2000). Efficient DNA electrotransfer into tumors. Bioelectrochemistry 52:83–90.
  • Bora, Utpal. (2014) Gene Transfer Techniques: Physical or Mechanical Methods. http://nptel.ac.in/courses/102103013/module5/lec3/1.html
  • Boudreau EF, Josleyn M, Ullman D, et al. (2012). A Phase 1 clinical trial of Hantaan virus and Puumala virus M-segment DNA vaccines for hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. Vaccine 30:1951–8.
  • Bugeon S, de Chevigny A, Boutin C, et al. (2017). Direct and efficient transfection of mouse neural stem cells and mature neurons by in vivo mRNA electroporation. Development 144:3968–77.
  • Cai D, Mataraza JM, Qin Z, et al. (2005). Highly efficient molecular delivery into mammalian cells using carbon nanotube spearing. Nat Meth 2:449–54.
  • Chakravarty P, Qian W, El-Sayed MA, Prausnitz MR. (2010). Delivery of molecules into cells using carbon nanoparticles activated by femtosecond laser pulses. NATURE Nanotech 5:607–11.
  • Chan, DCF. (1998). Magneto-biolistic methods: US.
  • Chen C, Chen J, Lee W. (2009). Fast transfection of mammalian cells using superparamagnetic nanoparticles under strong magnetic field. J Nanosci Nanotech 9:2651–9.
  • Chen W, Cui H, Zhao X, et al. (2015). Characterization and Insights Into the Nano Liposomal Magnetic Gene Vector Used for Cell Co-Transfection. j Nanosci Nanotechnol 15:5530–6.
  • Cho WS, Duffin R, Poland CA, et al. (2012). Differential pro-inflammatory effects of metal oxide nanoparticles and their soluble ions in vitro and in vivo; zinc and copper nanoparticles, but not their ions, recruit eosinophils to the lungs. Nanotoxicology 6:22–35.
  • Chuah MKL, Collen D, VandenDriessche T. (2003). Biosafety of adenoviral vectors. CGT 3:527.
  • Clark IB, Hanania EG, Stevens J, et al. (2006). Optoinjection for efficient targeted delivery of a broad range of compounds and macromolecules into diverse cell types. J Biomed Opt 11:014034.
  • Das AK, Gupta P, Chakraborty D. (2015). Physical methods of gene transfer: Kinetics of gene delivery into cells: a Review. Agri Rev 36:61.
  • Dasgupta A, Liu M, Ojha T, et al. (2016). Ultrasound-mediated drug delivery to the brain: principles, progress and prospects. Drug Discovery Today: Technologies 20:41–8.
  • Delalande A, Kotopoulis S, Postema M, et al. (2013). Sonoporation: Mechanistic insights and ongoing challenges for gene transfer. Gene 525:191–9.
  • Dhakal K, Black B, Mohanty S. (2015). Introduction of impermeable actin-staining molecules to mammalian cells by optoporation. Sci Rep 4:6553.
  • DiGiusto DL, Krishnan A, Li L, et al. (2010). RNA-based gene therapy for HIV with lentiviral vector-modified CD34(+) cells in patients undergoing transplantation for AIDS-related lymphoma. Sci Transl Med 2:36ra43–43r.
  • Dijkink R, Le GS, Nijhuis E, et al. (2008). Controlled cavitation-cell interaction: trans-membrane transport and viability studies. Phys Med Biol 53:375–90.
  • Dimcevski G, Kotopoulis S, Bjanes T, et al. (2016). A human clinical trial using ultrasound and microbubbles to enhance gemcitabine treatment of inoperable pancreatic cancer. J Controlled Release 243:172–81.
  • Donate A, Coppola D, Cruz Y, Heller R. (2011). Evaluation of a novel non-penetrating electrode for use in DNA vaccination. PLoS One 6:e19181.
  • Doukas AG, Flotte TJ. (1996). Physical characteristics and biological effects of laser-induced stress waves. Ultrasound Med Biol 22:151–64.
  • El-Aneed A. (2004). An overview of current delivery systems in cancer gene therapy. J Control Release 94:1–14.
  • Fan, Q, Hu, W, Ohta, AT. (2013). Light-Induced Microbubble Poration of Localized Cells. In IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference Proceedings (pp. 4482–4485).
  • Fan Q, Hu W, Ohta AT. (2014). Laser-induced microbubble poration of localized single cells. LAB Chip 14:1572–8.
  • Fan Q, Hu W, Ohta AT. (2015). Efficient single-cell poration by microsecond laser pulses. LAB Chip 15:581–8.
  • Fan Z, Kumon RE, Deng CX. (2014). Mechanisms of microbubble-facilitated sonoporation for drug and gene delivery. Therapeutic Delivery 5:467–86.
  • Ferraro B, Cruz YL, Coppola D, Heller R. (2009). Intradermal delivery of plasmid vegf165 by electroporation promotes wound healing. Molecul Ther 17:651–7.
  • Frey W, White JA, Price RO, et al. (2006). Plasma Membrane Voltage Changes during Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field Exposure. Biophys J 90:3608–15.
  • Gehl J. (2003). Electroporation: theory and methods, perspectives for drug delivery, gene therapy and research. Acta Physiol Scand 177:437
  • Gehl J, Sorensen TH, Nielsen K, et al. (1999). In vivo electroporation of skeletal muscle: threshold, efficacy and relation to electric field distribution. Biochim Biophys Acta 1428:233–40.
  • George S, Xia T, Rallo R, et al. (2011). Use of a high-throughput screening approach coupled with in vivo zebrafish embryo screening to develop hazard ranking for engineered nanomaterials. Acs Nano 5:1805–17.
  • Guo S, Donate A, Basu G, et al. (2011). Electro-gene transfer to skin using a noninvasive multielectrode array. J Control Release 151:256–62.
  • Hao Y, Kanasty RL, Eltoukhy AA, Vegas AJ, Dorkin JR. (2014). Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy. Nature Reviews Genetics 15:541–55.
  • Hashimoto M, Hisano Y. (2011). Directional gene-transfer into the brain by an adenoviral vector tagged with magnetic nanoparticles. J Neurosci Methods 194:316–20.
  • He H, Kong S, Lee RK, et al. (2008). Targeted photoporation and transfection in human HepG2 cells by a fiber femtosecond laser at 1554 nm. Opt Lett 33:2961–3.
  • Heinemann D, Schomaker M, Kalies S, et al. (2013). Gold nanoparticle mediated laser transfection for efficient sirna mediated gene knock down. PLoS One 8:e58604.
  • Heller R, Cruz Y, Heller LC, et al. (2010). Electrically mediated delivery of plasmid DNA to the skin, using a multielectrode array. Hum Gene Ther 21:357–62.
  • Heller LC, Heller R. (2006). In vivo electroporation for gene therapy. Hum Gene Ther 17:890–7.
  • Heller R, Heller LC. (2015). Gene electrotransfer clinical trials. Adv Genet 89:235
  • Heller R, Jaroszeski M, Atkin A, et al. (1996). In vivo gene electroinjection and expression in rat liver. Febs Lett 389:225–8.
  • Heller L, Jaroszeski MJ, Coppola D, et al. (2000). Electrically mediated plasmid DNA delivery to hepatocellular carcinomas in vivo. Gene Ther 7:826.
  • Heller LC, Jaroszeski MJ, Domenico C, Richard H. (2008). Comparison of electrically mediated and liposome-complexed plasmid DNA delivery to the skin. Genet Vaccines Ther 6:16.
  • Hellman AN, Rau KR, Yoon HH, Venugopalan V. (2008). Biophysical Response to Pulsed Laser microbeam-induced cell lysis and molecular delivery. J Biophotonics 1:24–35.
  • Herrero MJ, Sendra L, Miguel A, Alino SF. (2017). physical methods of gene delivery. In N. Brunetti-Pierri (Ed.), Safety and Efficacy of Gene-Based Therapeutics for Inherited Disorders (pp. 113–135): Springer International Publishing.
  • Holmen SL, Vanbrocklin MW, Eversole RR, et al. (1995). Efficient lipid-mediated transfection of DNA into primary rat hepatocytes[J]. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol – Animal 31:347–51.
  • Huang, D, Zhao, D, Li, J, Du, L, Wei, Z, Liang, Z, et al. (2017). A minimally invasive in vivo electroporation method utilizing flexile electrode and microneedle roller. Paper presented at the International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems.
  • Husseini GA, Pitt WG. (2008). Micelles and nanoparticles for ultrasonic drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:1137–52.
  • Hüttmann, GK, Bever, M, Rahmanzadeh, R, Geerdes, J, Yao, C (2005a). Selective permeabilization of cells by laser irradiated gold nano particles, European conference on biomedical optics. Optical Society of America.
  • Hüttmann G, Yao C, Endl E. (2005). New concepts in laser medicine: Towards a laser surgery with cellular precision. Med Laser Appl 20:135–9.
  • Ibraheem D, Elaissari A, Fessi H. (2014). Gene therapy and DNA delivery systems. Int J Pharm 459:70.
  • Ito H, Morishita R, Iwamoto I, Nagata K. (2014). Establishment of an in vivo electroporation method into postnatal newborn neurons in the dentate gyrus. Hippocampus 12(24):1449–57.
  • Jakutavičiūtė M, Ruzgys P, Tamošiūnas M, et al. (2017). Physical methods for drug and gene delivery through the cell plasma membrane. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 227:73–92.
  • Jaroszeski MJ, Gilbert RA, Heller R. (1997). In vivo antitumor effects of electrochemotherapy in a hepatoma model. Biochim Biophys Acta 1334:15–8.
  • Johnson LA, Morgan RA, Dudley ME, et al. (2009). Gene therapy with human and mouse T-cell receptors mediates cancer regression and targets normal tissues expressing cognate antigen. Blood 114:535–46.
  • Kalams SA, Parker SD, Elizaga M, et al. (2013). Safety and comparative immunogenicity of an HIV-1 DNA vaccine in combination with plasmid interleukin 12 and impact of intramuscular electroporation for delivery. J Infect Dis 208:818–29.
  • Kim TK, Eberwine JH. (2010). Mammalian cell transfection: the present and the future. Anal Bioanal Chem 397:3173–8.
  • Kim HJ, Greenleaf JF, Kinnick RR, et al. (1996). Ultrasound-mediated transfection of mammalian cells. Hum Gene Ther 7:1339.
  • Koike H, Tomita N, Azuma H, et al. (2005). An efficient gene transfer method mediated by ultrasound and microbubbles into the kidney. J Gene Med 7:108–16.
  • Kotnik T, Frey W, Sack M, et al. (2015). Electroporation-Based Applications in Biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 33:480–8.
  • Kotopoulis S, Delalande A, Popa M, et al. (2014). Sonoporation-enhanced chemotherapy significantly reduces primary tumour burden in an orthotopic pancreatic cancer xenograft. Mol Imaging Biol 16:53–62.
  • Kotopoulis S, Dimcevski G, Helge Gilja O, et al. (2013). Treatment of human pancreatic cancer using combined ultrasound, microbubbles, and gemcitabine: A clinical case study. Med Phys 40:072902.
  • Kurosaki T, Kawakami S, Higuchi Y, et al. (2014). Kidney-selective gene transfection using anionic bubble lipopolyplexes with renal ultrasound irradiation in mice. Nanomed-Nanotechnol Biol Med 10:1829–38.
  • Latella MC, Di Salvo MT, Cocchiarella F, et al. (2016). In vivo editing of the human mutant rhodopsin gene by electroporation of plasmid-based CRISPR/Cas9 in the mouse retina. Molecular Ther – Nucleic Acids 5:e389.
  • Lei M, Xu H, Yang H, Yao B. (2008). Femtosecond laser-assisted microinjection into living neurons. J Neurosci Methods 174:215–8.
  • Lentacker I, De Cock I, Deckers R, et al. (2014). Understanding ultrasound induced sonoporation: definitions and underlying mechanisms. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 72:49–64.
  • Li W, Ma N, Ong LL, et al. (2008). Enhanced thoracic gene delivery by magnetic nanobead-mediated vector. J Gene Med 10:897–909.
  • Liu D, Wang L, Wang Z, Cuschieri A. (2012). Magnetoporation and magnetolysis of cancer cells via carbon nanotubes induced by rotating magnetic fields. Nano Lett 12:5117–21.
  • Liu Y, Yan J, Prausnitz MR. (2012). Can ultrasound enable efficient intracellular uptake of molecules? A retrospective literature review and analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 38:876–88.
  • Lu QL, Liang HD, Partridge T, Blomley M. (2003). Microbubble ultrasound improves the efficiency of gene transduction in skeletal muscle in vivo with reduced tissue damage. Gene Ther 10:396–405.
  • Lv H, Zhang S, Wang B, et al. (2006). Toxicity of cationic lipids and cationic polymers in gene delivery. J Control Release 114:100–9. Society,
  • Mah C, Zolotukhin I, Fraites TJ. (2000). Microsphere-mediated delivery of recombinant AAV vectors in vitro and in vivo. Mol Ther 1:S239.
  • Markelc B, Bellard E, Sersa G, et al. (2018). Increased permeability of blood vessels after reversible electroporation is facilitated by alterations in endothelial cell-to-cell junctions. J Control Release 276:30–41.
  • Mason TJ. (1988). Sonochemistry: Theory, Applications and Uses of Ultrasound in Chemistry: Ellis Horwood.
  • Meacham JM, Durvasula K, Degertekin FL, Fedorov AG. (2014). Physical methods for intracellular delivery: practical aspects from laboratory use to industrial-scale processing. J Lab Autom 19:1–18.
  • Megli SH, Kotnik T. (2015). Electroporation-Based Applications in Biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 33:480–88.
  • Mehier-Humbert S, Guy RH. (2005). Physical methods for gene transfer: Improving the kinetics of gene delivery into cells. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 57:733–53.
  • Mellott AJ, Forrest ML, Detamore MS. (2013). Physical non-viral gene delivery methods for tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng 41:446–68.
  • Miao CH, Brayman AA, Loeb KR, et al. (2005). Ultrasound enhances gene delivery of human factor IX plasmid. Hum Gene Ther 16:893–905.
  • Miklavcic D, Mali B, Kos B, et al. (2014). Electrochemotherapy: from the drawing board into medical practice. Biomed Eng Online 13:29
  • Miller DL, Song JM. (2003). Tumor growth reduction and DNA transfer by cavitation-enhanced high-intensity focused ultrasound in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:887–93.
  • Miyazaki JI, Aihara H. (1998). Gene transfer into muscle by electroporation in vivo. Nat Biotechnol 16:867.
  • Moss JA. (2014). Gene therapy review. Radiol Technol 86:155.
  • Newman CM, Bettinger T. (2007). Gene therapy progress and prospects: ultrasound for gene transfer. Gene. Gene Ther 14:465–75.
  • Nishimura K, Fumoto S, Fuchigami Y, et al. (2017). Effective intraperitoneal gene transfection system using nanobubbles and ultrasound irradiation. Drug Deliv 24:737–44.
  • Noack, J, Vogel, A (1995). Streak-photographic investigation of shock wave emission after laser-induced plasma formation in water. SPIE 284–293.
  • Nomikou N, Feichtinger GA, Saha S, et al. (2018). Ultrasound-responsive gene-activated matrices for osteogenic gene therapy using matrix-assisted sonoporation. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 12:e250–60.
  • Paterson L, Agate B, Comrie M, et al. (2005). Photoporation and cell transfection using a violet diode laser. Opt Express 13:595–600.
  • Pereyra AS, Mykhaylyk O, Lockhart EF, et al. (2016). Magnetofection enhances adenoviral vector-based gene delivery in skeletal muscle cells. J Nanomed Nanotechnol 7(2).
  • Pickard MR, Barraud P, Chari DM. (2011). The transfection of multipotent neural precursor/stem cell transplant populations with magnetic nanoparticles. Biomaterials 32:2274–84.
  • Plank, C, Scherer, F, Schillinger, U, Anton, M (2000). Magnetofection: Enhancement and localization of gene delivery with magnetic particles under the influence of a magnetic field. J Gene Med 2:24.
  • Plank C, Schillinger U, Scherer F, et al. (2003). The magnetofection method: using magnetic force to enhance gene delivery. Biol Chem 384:737–47.
  • Polyakova T, Zablotskii V, Dejneka A. (2017). Cell membrane pore formation and change in ion channel activity in high-gradient magnetic fields. IEEE Magn Lett 8:1–5.
  • Qin Z, Bischof JC. (2012). Thermophysical and biological responses of gold nanoparticle laser heating. Chem Soc Rev 41:1191–217.
  • Sagi S, Knoll T, Trojan L, et al. (2003). Gene delivery into prostate cancer cells by holmium laser application. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 6:127–30.
  • Sapet C, Laurent N, de Chevigny A, et al. (2011). High transfection efficiency of neural stem cells with magnetofection. Biotechniques 50:187–9.
  • Sapet C, Pellegrino C, Laurent N, et al. (2012). Magnetic nanoparticles enhance adenovirus transduction in vitro and in vivo. Pharm Res 29:1203–18.
  • Schneckenburger H, Hendinger A, Sailer R, et al. (2002). Laser-assisted optoporation of single cells. J Biomed Opt 7:410–6.
  • Schomaker, M, Baumgart, J, Ngezahayo, A, et al. (2009). Plasmonic perforation of living cells using ultrashort laser pulses and gold nanoparticles (pp. 71920U): SPIE.
  • Schwarz D, Kollo M, Bosch C, et al. (2018). Architecture of a mammalian glomerular domain revealed by novel volume electroporation using nanoengineered microelectrodes. Nat Commun 9.
  • Sengupta A, Kelly SC, Dwivedi N, et al. (2014). Efficient intracellular delivery of molecules with high cell viability using nanosecond-pulsed laser-activated carbon nanoparticles. ACS Nano 8:2889–99.
  • Shapiro G, Wong AW, Bez M, et al. (2016). Multiparameter evaluation of in vivo gene delivery using ultrasound-guided, microbubble-enhanced sonoporation. J Control Release 223:157–64.
  • Shen ZY, Xia GL, Wu MF, et al. (2016). The effects of percutaneous ethanol injection followed by 20-kHz ultrasound and microbubbles on rabbit hepatic tumors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 142:373–8.
  • Shi Y, Huang D, Zhou L, et al. (2015). In situ preparation of size-controlled iron oxide nanocrystals using double-hydrophilic multiarm hyperbranched polymers as nanoreactors and their magnetofection In Vitro. Sci Adv Mater 7:219–26.
  • Shirahata Y, Ohkohchi N, Itagak H, Satomi S. (2001). New technique for gene transfection using laser irradiation. J Invest Med 49:184–90.
  • Shi Y, Wu Z, Weng X, et al. (2016). Facile preparation of magnetic nanocrystals using amphiphilic hyperbranched polymers as unimolecular nanoreactors and magnetofectionin vitro. Polym Compos 37:429–34.
  • Skachkov I, Luan Y, van der Steen AFW, et al. (2014). Targeted microbubble mediated sonoporation of endothelial cells in vivo. IEEE Trans Ultrason, Ferroelect, Freq Contr 61:1661–7.
  • Sohrabijam Z, Saeidifar M, Zamanian A. (2017). Enhancement of magnetofection efficiency using chitosan coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles and calf thymus DNA. Colloids Surf B 152:169–75.
  • Soto-Sanchez C, Martinez-Navarrete G, Humphreys L, et al. (2015). Enduring high-efficiency in vivo transfection of neurons with non-viral magnetoparticles in the rat visual cortex for optogenetic applications. Nanomed-Nanotechnol Biol Med 11:835–43.
  • Stevenson DJ, Gunn-Moore FJ, Campbell P, Dholakia K. (2010). Single cell optical transfection. J R Soc Interface 7:863–71.
  • Sun X, Gutierrez A, Yacaman MJ, et al. (2000). Investigations on magnetic properties and structure for carbon encapsulated nanoparticles of Fe, Co, Ni. Mater Sci Eng A 286:157–60.
  • Sun Y, Jurgovsky K, Möller P, et al. (1998). Vaccination with IL-12 gene-modified autologous melanoma cells: preclinical results and a first clinical phase I study. Gene Ther 5:481–90.
  • Suzuki T, Shin BC, Fujikura K, et al. (1998). Direct gene transfer into rat liver cells by in vivo electroporation. Febs Lett 425:436–40.
  • Tirlapur UK, König K. (2002). Cell biology: Targeted transfection by femtosecond laser. Nature 418:290–1.
  • Todorova R. (2011). Comparative analysis of the methods of drug and protein delivery for the treatment of cancer, genetic diseases and diagnostics. Drug Delivery 18:586–98.
  • Tomitaka, A, Kobayashi, H, Yamada, T, et al. (2010). Magnetization and self-heating temperature of NiFe2O4 nanoparticles measured by applying ac magnetic field.
  • Tomizawa M, Shinozaki F, Motoyoshi Y, et al. (2013). Sonoporation: Gene transfer using ultrasound. World J Methodol 3:39–44.
  • Trimble C, Lin CT, Hung CF, et al. (2003). Comparison of the CD8+ T cell responses and antitumor effects generated by DNA vaccine administered through gene gun, biojector, and syringe. Vaccine 21:4036.
  • Tsampoula X, Taguchi K, Cizmar T, et al. (2008). Fibre based cellular transfection. Opt Express 16:17007–13.
  • Tsukakoshi M, Kurata S, Nomiya Y, et al. (1984). A novel method of dna transfection by laser microbeam cell surgery. Appl Phys B 35:135–40.
  • Umebayashi Y, Miyamoto Y, Wakita M, et al. (2003). Elevation of plasma membrane permeability on laser irradiation of extracellular latex particles. J Biochem 134:219–24.
  • Unger E, Porter T, Lindner J, Grayburn P. (2014). Cardiovascular drug delivery with ultrasound and microbubbles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 72:110–26.
  • Van Meirvenne S, Straetman L, Heirman C, et al. (2002). Efficient genetic modification of murine dendritic cells by electroporation with mRNA. Cancer Gene Ther 9:787–97.
  • Vanbever R, Préat V. (1999). In vivo efficacy and safety of skin electroporation. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 35:77–88.
  • Vanzha E, Pylaev T, Prilepskii A, et al. (2017). Cell culture surfaces with immobilized gold nanostars: a new approach for laser-induced plasmonic cell optoporation. In E. A. Genina, V. V. Tuchin (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE (Vol. 10336).
  • Villemejane J, Mir LM. (2009). Physical methods of nucleic acid transfer: general concepts and applications. Br J Pharmacol 157:207–19.
  • Wagstaff P, Buijs M, van den Bos W, et al. (2016). Irreversible electroporation: state of the art. Onco Targets Ther 9:2437–46.
  • Wang Y, Cui H, Li K, et al. (2014). A magnetic nanoparticle-based multiple-gene delivery system for transfection of porcine kidney cells. PLoS One 9:e106612.
  • Wang Y, Cui H, Sun C, et al. (2013). Study on performance of magnetic fluorescent nanoparticles as gene carrier and location in pig kidney cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 8:127–6.
  • Wang Q, Jiang W, Chen Y, et al. (2014). In vivo electroporation of minicircle DNA as a novel method of vaccine delivery to enhance HIV-1-specific immune responses. J Virol 88:1924–34.
  • Washbourne P, McAllister AK. (2002). Techniques for gene transfer into neurons. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12:566–73.
  • Weiland O, Ahlen G, Diepolder H, et al. (2013). Therapeutic DNA vaccination using in vivo electroporation followed by standard of care therapy in patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C. Mol Ther 21:1796–805.
  • Yamaguchi A, Hosokawa Y, Louit G, et al. (2008). Nanoparticle injection to single animal cells using femtosecond laser-induced impulsive force. Appl Phys A 93:39–43. & PROCESSING,
  • Yao C, Li Z, Zhang Z. (2005b). Study on the Fundamental of the Laser High Precision Microsurgery. Acta Optica 25:12–1664. SINICA.
  • Yao C, Qu X, Zhang Z, et al. (2009). Influence of laser parameters on nanoparticle-induced membrane permeabilization. J Biomed Opt 14:054034–540345.
  • Yao C, Qu X, Zhang Z. (2009). Laser-based transfection with conjugated gold nanoparticles. Chin Opt Lett 7:898–900.
  • Yao CP, Rahmanzadeh R, Endl E, et al. (2005). Elevation of plasma membrane permeability by laser irradiation of selectively bound nanoparticles. J Biomed Opt 10:064012–640126.
  • Yao C, Rudnitzki F, Huettmann G, et al. (2017). Important factors for cell-membrane permeabilization by gold nanoparticles activated by nanosecond-laser irradiation. Int J Nanomed 12:5659–72.
  • Yao C, Zhang Z, Rahmanzadeh R, Huettmann G. (2008). Laser-based gene transfection and gene therapy. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 7:111–9.
  • Yarmush ML, Golberg A, Serša A, et al. (2014). Electroporation-based technologies for medicine: principles, applications, and challenges. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 16:295–320.
  • Yin H, Kanasty RL, Eltoukhy AA, et al. (2014). Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy. Nat Rev Genet 15:541–55.
  • Young JL, Dean DA. (2015). Electroporation-mediated gene delivery. Adv Genet 89:49.
  • Zhang Y, Chang R, Li M, et al. (2016). Docetaxel-loaded lipid microbubbles combined with ultrasound-triggered microbubble destruction for targeted tumor therapy in MHCC-H cells. OTT 9:4763–71.
  • Zhang Y, Yu LC. (2008). Microinjection as a tool of mechanical delivery. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:506.
  • Zhao X, Cui H, Chen W, et al. (2014). Morphology, structure and function characterization of pei modified magnetic nanoparticles gene delivery system. PLoS One 9:e98919.
  • Zhao X, Meng Z, Wang Y, et al. (2017). Pollen magnetofection for genetic modification with magnetic nanoparticles as gene carriers. Nature Plants 3:956–64.
  • Zhou QL, Chen ZY, Wang YX, et al. (2014). Ultrasound-mediated local drug and gene delivery using nanocarriers. Biomed Res Int 2014:1.
  • Zhou X, Liu B, Yu X, et al. (2007). Using magnetic force to enhance immune response to DNA vaccine. Small 3:1707–13.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.