Toward More Effective Legal Education for Adolescents: Systematic or Constructivist Instructional Design Models?

References

• Akar, H. (2003). Impact of constructivist learning process on preservice teacher education students' performance, retention, and attitudes (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/3/1102136/index.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Arizona Foundation for Legal Services and Education (AFLSE). (2017). Law related education. Retrieved from http://www.azflse.org/azflse/professional_development/lawrelated/Copy%20of%20index.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Arruzzo, K. L. (2006). The effect of a constructivist social studies unit on student attitudes toward social studies (Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/879.
   Google Scholar
• Bogar, Y., Kalender, S., & Sarikaya, M. (2012). The effects of constructive learning method on students’ academic achievement, retention of knowledge, gender, and attitudes towards science course in “matter of structure and characteristics” unit. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1766–1770. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.375
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, J. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, A., Pleasence, P., & Balmer, N. J. (2008). Do citizens know how to deal with legal issues? Some empirical insights. Journal of Social Policy, 37(4), 661–681. doi: 10.1017/S0047279408002262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butzler, K. B. (2014). The effects of motivation on achievement and satisfaction in a flipped classroom learning environment (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database (UMI No. 3637765).
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, E. (1980). Component display theory and study strategies: The effects of objectives and cognitive compensating strategy on impoverished materials in a concept classification task. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 8000059).
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, J. F., & Clark, L. H. (1998). Teaching in the middle and secondary schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-Y., Hua, H.-P., & Barufaldi, J. P. (1999). Earth science student attitudes toward a constructivist teaching approach in Taiwan. Journal of Geoscience Education, 47(4), 331–335. doi: 10.5408/1089-9995-47.4.331
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. (2007). Instructional design strategies for intensive online courses: An objectivist constructivist blended approach. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 72–86.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20. doi: 10.3102/0013189X023007013
   Google Scholar
• Dhinsda, H., & Treagust, D. (2006). Using constructivist teaching to improve upon an unproductive didactical contract during chemistry learning. Science Education International, 17(1), 109–121.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-8327.1993.tb00605.x
   Google Scholar
• Fardanesh, H. (2004). Theoretical foundations of instructional technology. Tehran: Samt, 6, 1–244 [In Persian].
   Google Scholar
• Fardanesh, H. (2006). A classification of constructivist instructional design models based on learning and teaching approaches. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1b/d0/c2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fazelian, P., Ebrahim, A. N., & Soraghi, S. (2010). The effect of 5E instructional design model on learning and retention of sciences for middle class students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 140–143. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.062
   Google Scholar
• Fer, S. (2016). The effectiveness of the model of ‘social constructivist learning environment’design through research. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 87–95. doi: 10.18844/gjhss.v2i1.284
   Google Scholar
• Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, M. (2015). Learning and education. In D. Winter & N. Reed (eds.), The Wiley handbook of personal construct psychology (pp. 352–360). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gagne, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1974). Principles of instructional design. Oxford: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. (2009). Toward a pragmatic discourse of constructivism: Reflections on lessons from practice. Educational Studies, 45(1), 39–58. doi: 10.1080/00131940802546894
   Google Scholar
• Grimes, R. (2015). Problem-based learning and legal education: A case study in integrated experiential study. REDU: Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 13(1), 17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadley, J., Kulier, R., Zamora, J., Coppus, S. F., Weinbrenner, S., Meyerrose, B., … Khan, K. S. (2010). Effectiveness of an e-learning course in evidence-based medicine for foundation (internship) training. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 103(7), 288–294. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.100036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, 2, 115–140.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, J. D., & Lishner, D. M. (1987). Schooling and delinquency. In E. H. Johnson (Ed.), Handbook on crime and delinquency prevention (pp. 179–221). New York: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Hlinak, M. (2014, March). Life as a casebook: Constructivist approaches to legal studies education. Paper presented at Proceedings of the Midwest Academy of Legal Studies in Business. Dominican University, Illinois. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2767129.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, R., & Davis, J. (1984). Law-related educational evaluation project final report, Phase II, Year 3. Unpublished final report to the U. S. Department of Justice. Social Science Education Consortium and Center for Action Research.
   Google Scholar
• Husen, T., & Postlethwaite, T. N. (1994). The international encyclopedia of education. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Jayalakshmi, V., & Janakavalli, C. (2015). Effectiveness of constructivist approach for enhancing achievement in chemistry among 9th std students. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, 2(3), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G., & Hunter, R. (1985). Law-related education as a delinquency prevention strategy: A three-year evaluation of the impact of LRE on students. Unpublished paper adapted from a report submitted to the National Institute for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention on June, 6, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5–14. doi: 10.1007/BF02296434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology: Toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology, 34(4), 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional technology (Vol. 2, pp. 215–239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centered learning environments. In D. H. Jonassen, & S. M. Land, Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 89–121). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Karaduman, H., & Gultekin, M. (2007). The effect of constructivist learning principles based learning materials to students’ attitudes, success and retention in social studies. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(3), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. A. (1970). Behaviour is an experiment. In D. Bannister (Ed.), Perspectives in personal construct psychology (pp. 255–269). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kenrick, J. (2002). Rights to access: Meeting young people’s needs for advice. London: Youth Access.
   Google Scholar
• Khalid, A., & Azeem, M. (2012). Constructivist vs traditional: Effective instructional approach in teacher education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 170–177.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. S. (2005). The effects of a constructivist teaching approach on student academic achievement, self-concept, and learning strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 7–19. doi: 10.1007/BF03024963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2008). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. M. (2006). Applying the ADDIE Instructional design model to multimedia rich project-based learning experiences in the korean classroom. Educational Technology International, 7(1), 81–98.
   Google Scholar
• Leow, F. T., & Neo, M. (2013). Assessing collaboration in a web-based constructivist learning environment: A malaysian perspective. In ASCILITE-australian society for computers in learning in tertiary education annual conference (pp. 503–513). Australasian society for computers in learning in tertiary education.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W., & Haley, F. (1982). Implementing effective LRE programs. Social Science Education Consortium: Boulder, CO: ED, 233, 928.
   Google Scholar
• Maheshwari, G., & Thomas, S. (2017). An analysis of the effectiveness of the constructivist approach to teaching business statistics. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 20, 83–98. doi: 10.28945/3748
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed). Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 279–333). Hillsdael, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, M. D. (1994). Instructional design theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, M. D. (1999). Instructional transaction theory (ITT): Instructional design based on knowledge objects. Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, 2, 397–424.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., Pratt, J., & Group, I. R. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology, 36(5), 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, M. D., Olsen, J., & Coldeway, N. A. (1976). Research support for the instructional strategy diagnostic profile. Technical Report Series, No. 3. Orem, UT: Courseware.
   Google Scholar
• Moallem, M. (2001). Applying constructivist and objectivist learning theories in the design of a web-based course: Implications for practice. Educational Technology & Society, 4(3), 113–125.
   Google Scholar
• Mwanda, G. M., Odundo, P., Midigo, R., & Mwanda, O. S. (2016). Adoption of the constructivist learning approach in secondary schools in Kenya: Focus on learner achievement in biology by class category. US-China Education Review, 6(1), 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Narli, S. (2011). Is constructivist learning environment really effective on learning and long-term knowledge retention in mathematics? Example of the infinity concept. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(1), 36.
   Google Scholar
• National Law-Related Education Evaluation Project (NLREEP). (1984). Law-related education project final report, Phase 11, Year 3. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, Center for Action Research and the Social Science Education Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education (OME). (2015). The Ontario curriculum grades 11 and 12: Canadian and world studies. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/2015cws11and12.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, C. (1995). Linking law-related education to reducing violence by and against youth. Bloomington, Ind.: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1980). The psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance. In M. Piatelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning (pp. 23–34). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459–470. doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
   Google Scholar
• Pope, M. L., & Keen, T. R. (1981). Personal construct psychology and education. London, England: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qarareh, A. O. (2016). The effect of using the constructivist learning model in teaching science on the achievement and scientific thinking of 8th Grade students. International Education Studies, 9(7), 178. doi: 10.5539/ies.v9n7p178
   Google Scholar
• Qi, C. C., & Li, Z. (2017). An analysis of Deng Xiaoping’s ideology of legal education for teenagers. 3rd Annual International Conference on Modern Education and Social Science (MESS 2017) ISBN: 978-1-60595-450-9.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority (QCAA). (2013). Legal studies. Retrieved from https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/senior/subjects/business-economics/legal-studies-2013.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, N. (2015). Psychology and law. In D. Winter & N. Reed (eds.), The Wiley handbook of personal construct psychology (pp. 464–475). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, C. M. (1979). In search of a better way to organize instruction: The elaboration theory. Journal of Instructional Development, 2(3), 8–15. doi: 10.1007/BF02984374
   Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 5–29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2010). The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, K. (2006). Effective teaching practices for students with and without learning difficulties: Issues and implications surrounding key findings and recommendations from the national inquiry into the teaching of literacy. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11(3), 99–115. doi: 10.1080/19404150609546813
   Google Scholar
• Savas, B., Senemoglu, N., & Kocabas, A. (2012). The effects of the integrated unit and constructivist based teaching learning process on fourth grades students’ learning levels, attitudes towards learning, academic self-confident. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2811–2815. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.569
   Google Scholar
• Semerci, Ç., & Batdi, V. (2015). A meta-analysis of constructivist learning approach on learners’ academic achievements, retention and attitudes. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(2), 171–180. doi: 10.11114/jets.v3i2.644
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, T. M., & Kurshan, B. L. (2005). Constructing learning: Using technology to support teaching for understanding. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(5), 10.
   Google Scholar
• Spiro, R. J. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in Ill-structured domains. Technical Report No. 441.
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. E. (Eds.). (1995). Constructivism in education (p. 159). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Toraman, C., & Demir, E. (2016). The effect of constructivism on attitudes towards lessons: A meta–analysis study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(62): 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Studies in Mathematics Education Serie; 6. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hurst, E. M. (1984). The effectiveness of component display theory in the remediation of self-instructional materials for Japanese learners (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 794.
   Google Scholar
• Vrasidas, C. (2000). Constructivism versus objectivism: Implications for interaction, course design, and evaluation in distance education. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6(4), 339–362.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, E. (1985). School crime prevention programs. Justice Administration Essays, 1, 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students’ approaches to learning: Comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 87–101. doi: 10.1080/0260293042003251770
   Google Scholar
• Wintersteiger, L., & Mulqueen, T. (2017). Decentering law through public legal education. Onati Socio-Legal Series, 7(7), 1557–1580.
   Google Scholar
• Yasmin, T. (2012). International practice of public legal education: A missing element in the justice system of Bangladesh. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 38(3), 467–483.
   Google Scholar