Waves of Information, Suffocated Understanding, and the Place for Narrative Inquiry in the “Post-Truth” Era

References

• Arriazu, R. (2018). A research methodology in the service of critical thinking: Hermeneutic approach in the post-truth era. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(148), 1—22. doi:10.14507/epaa.26.3393
   Google Scholar
• Bakan, D. (1967). On method: Toward a reconstruction of psychological investigation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberg, M. (2012). Why narrative? Narrative Inquiry, 22(1), 202–210. doi:10.1075/ni.22.1.16bam
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansel, P. (2015). The subject of policy. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 5–20. doi:10.1080/17508487.2015.971839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia, S. (2011). Narrative inquiry as cultural psychology: Meaning-making in a contested global world. Narrative Inquiry, 21(2), 345–352. doi:10.1075/ni.21.2.13bha
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmeier, J. (2012). Culturally thick notion of narrative. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 439–467). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1992). Poetics, politics, and truth: An invitation to rhetorical analysis. In R. H. Brown (Ed.), Writing the social text: Poetics and politics in social science discourse (pp. 3-8). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning (Vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21. doi:10.1086/448619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1998). What is a narrative fact? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 560(1), 17–27. doi:10.1177/0002716298560001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (2003). Making stories: Law, literature, life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brydon-Miller, M., & Tolman, D. L. (2001). Making room for subjectivities: Remedies for the discipline of psychology. In D. L. Tolman & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), From subjects to subjectivities: A handbook of interpretive and participatory methods (pp. 319–327). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. W., (1993). The mass media and democracy: Between the modern and the postmodern. Journal of International Affairs, 47(1),1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, S. E., (2007). Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In. N.K. Denzin and, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, 57(3), 651–679. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., Pushor, D., & Orr, A. M. (2007). Navigating sites for narrative inquiry. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 21–35. doi:10.1177/0022487106296218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloud, D. (2018). Reality bites. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daiute, C. (2014). Narrative inquiry: A dynamic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dunkelman, M. J. (2014). The vanishing neighbor: The transformation of American community. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 215–229. doi:10.1348/014466599162782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. doi:10.1177/146879410200200205
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. R. (1992). Narration, reason, and community. In R. H. Brown (Ed.), Writing the social text: Poetics and politics in social science discourse (pp. 177-197). New York,: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. R. (1995). Narration, knowledge, and the possibility of wisdom. In R. F. Goodman & W. R. Fisher (Eds.), Rethinking knowledge: Reflections across the disciplines (pp. 169–192). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. (1998). Mythical time, historical time, and the narrative fabric of the self. Narrative Inquiry, 8(1), 27–50. doi:10.1075/ni.8.1.03fre
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. (2019). What have we wrought? Narrative and its dangers. Keynote lecture presented at conference on “uses and Abuses of Storytelling: Theorizing the Intersections of Narrative, Memory, and Identity”. Finland: University of Turku.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and Method (J. Weinsheimer & DG Marshall, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. S., Spencer, R. R., Weinberg, M. K., & Bertsch, T. (2003). On the listening guide: A voice centered relational method. In P. Camic, J. Rhodes, & L. Yardsley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 57–172). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. (2008). Beyond the biopolitics of disposability: Rethinking neoliberalism in the New Gilded Age. Social Identities, 14(5), 587–620. doi:10.1080/13504630802343432
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, Ó. F. (1994). From epistemological truth to existential meaning in cognitive narrative psychotherapy. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 7(2), 107–118. doi:10.1080/10720539408405072
   Google Scholar
• Grysman, A., & Mansfield, C. D. (2017). What do we have when we have a narrative? Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 37(2), 105–126. doi:10.1177/0276236617733823
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, T. (2012). Emotion and narrative: Perspectives in autobiographical storytelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanlon, A. (2018, August 31). Postmodernism didn’t cause Trump. It explains him. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/postmodernism-didnt-cause-trump-it-explains-him/2018/08/30/0939f7c4-9b12-11e8-843b-36e177f3081c_story.html?utm_term=.d5b8ddd32acd
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. doi:10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harré, R. (2005). Some narrative conventions of scientific discourse. In C. Nash (Ed.), Narrative in culture (pp. 99–118). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Head, J. C. (2019). From the bottom-up: New York City teacher evaluation and the narration of mediated institutional assault. Critical Studies in Education, 60(1), 37–54. doi:10.1080/17508487.2016.1214159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, J. C., & Pryiomka, K. (2019). Accounting for mediatization in the era of individualized consequential accountability. Journal of Education Policy, 1–20. doi:10.1080/02680939.2019.1566578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfand, D. J. (2016). A survival guide to the misinformation age: Scientific habits of mind. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29. doi:10.1038/466029a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, H. J., & Kempen, H. J. (1993). The dialogical self: Meaning as movement. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holzkamp, K. (1992). On doing psychology critically. Theory & Psychology, 2(2), 193–204. doi:10.1177/0959354392022007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Josselson, R. (1995). Imagining the real: Empathy, narrative, and the dialogic self. Interpreting Experience: The Narrative Study of Lives, 3, 27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Josselson, R. (2004). The hermeneutics of faith and the hermeneutics of suspicion. Narrative Inquiry, 14(1), 1–28. doi:10.1075/ni.14.1.01jos
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josselson, R. (2006). Narrative research and the challenge of accumulating knowledge. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josselson, R. (2009). The present of the past: Dialogues with memory over time. Journal of Personality, 77(3), 647–668. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00560.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josselson, R. (2011a). “Bet you think this song is about you”: Whose narrative is it in narrative research? Narrative Works, 1(1), 33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Josselson, R. (2011b). Narrative research: Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing story. In F. J. Wertz, K. Charmaz, L. M. McMullen, R. Josselson, R. Anderson, & E. McSpadden (Eds.), Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry (pp. 224–242). London: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Josselson, R. (2013). Interviewing for qualitative inquiry: A relational approach. London: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kakutani, M. (2018). The death of truth: Notes on falsehood in the age of Trump. New York, NY: Tim Duggan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kamuf, P. (2007). Accounterability. Textual Practice, 21(2), 251–266. doi:10.1080/09502360701264428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvernbekk, T. (2007). Truth and form. Interchange, 38(4), 301–315. doi:10.1007/s10780-007-9033-0
   Google Scholar
• Kuntz, A. M., & Pickup, A. (2016). Critical inquiry for the social good: Methodological work as a means for truth-telling in education. Critical Questions in Education, 7(3), 171–177.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. and Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts (pp. 12–44).
   Google Scholar
• Lanser, S. S. (1996). Toward a feminist poetics of narrative voice. In D. H. Richter (Ed.), Narrative/Theory. London: Longman Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (Vol. 43, Alphonso Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2–22. doi:10.1037/qup0000082
   Google Scholar
• Loots, G., Coppens, K., & Sermijn, J. (2013). Practising a rhizomatic perspective in narrative research. Doing Narrative Research, 2, 108–125.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. P. (2001). The mystery of truth. In M. P. Lynch (Ed.), The nature of truth: Classic and contemporary perspectives (pp. 1-6). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madigan, S. (2011). Narrative therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1961). Are our publications and conventions suitable for the personal sciences? American Psychologist, 16(6), 318–319. doi:10.1037/h0039674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1966). The psychology of science: A reconnaissance. South Bend, IN: Gateway Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: The ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5(2), 100–122. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.2.100
   Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. (2008). Personal narratives and the life story. In J. Robins & Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 242-262). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKernan, J. F. & K. McPhail, (2012). Accountability and Accounterability. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23 (3), 177–182. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2011.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Murray, M. (2002). Connecting narrative and social representation theory in health research. Social Science Information, 41(4), 653–673. doi:10.1177/0539018402041004008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2009). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osbeck, L. M. (2014). Scientific reasoning as sense-making: Implications for qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Psychology, 1(1), 34–46. doi:10.1037/qup0000004
   Google Scholar
• Pickren, W., & Rutherford, A. (2010). A history of modern psychology in context. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado, J., & Clegg, J. W. (2011). Dialogism and the psyche: Bakhtin and Contemporary psychology. Culture & Psychology, 17(4), 421–440. doi:10.1177/1354067X11418545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarbin, T. R., & Carney, R. M. (2006). The narrative turn in social psychology. In B. D. Midgley and E. K. Morris (Eds.), Modern perspectives on JR Kantor and interbehaviorism (pp. 225–250). Oakland, CA: Context Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slife, B. D., Williams, R. N., & Williams, R. N. (1995). What's behind the research? Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B., & Sparkes, A. C. (2006). Narrative inquiry in psychology: Exploring the tensions within. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(3), 169–192. doi:10.1191/1478088706qrp068oa
   Google Scholar
• Sorsoli, L., & Tolman, D. L. (2008). Hearing voices. Listening for multiplicity and movement. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of Emergent Methods (pp. 495–515). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, D. P. (1984). Narrative truth and historical truth: Meaning and interpretation in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, C. (2013). From experience-centred to socioculturally-oriented approaches to narrative. In M. Andrews, C. Squire, & M. Tamboukou (Eds.), Doing Narrative Research, (pp. 47–71).
   Google Scholar
• Tappan, M. B. (2001). Interpretive psychology: Stories, circles, and understanding lived experience. In D. L. Tolman & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), From subjects to subjectivities: A handbook of interpretive and participatory methods (pp. 45–56). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tolman, D. L., & Brydon-Miller, M. (2001). Interpretive and participatory research methods: Moving toward subjectivities. In D. L. Tolman & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), From subjects to subjectivities: A handbook of interpretive and participatory methods (pp. 3–11). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tseelon, E. (1991). The method is the message; On the meaning of methods as ideologies. Theory & Psychology, 1(3), 299–316. doi:10.1177/0959354391013002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassilieva, J. (2016). Narrative psychology: Identity, transformation and ethics. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weis, L., & Fine, M. (2012). Critical bifocality and circuits of privilege: Expanding critical ethnographic theory and design. Harvard Educational Review, 82(2), 173–201. doi:10.17763/haer.82.2.v1jx34n441532242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertz, F., Charmaz, K., McMullen, L., Josselson, R., Anderson, R., & McSpadden, E. (2011). Five ways of doing qualitative research. New York, NY: Guilford Pres.
   Google Scholar
• Wertz, F. J. (2014). Qualitative inquiry in the history of psychology. Qualitative Psychology, 1(1), 4–16. doi:10.1037/qup0000007
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, P. M. (2016). Psychologizing: A personal, practice-based approach to psychology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Wundt, W. (1900–1920). Völkerpsychologie. Eine Untersuchung von Sprache, Mythos und Sitte. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
   Google Scholar