Rasch Models in the Analysis of Repgrid Data

References

• Anderson, N. (1990). Repertory grid technique in employee selection. Personnel Review, 19(3), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483489010143032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich, D. (1978). Rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43(4), 561–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselmi, P., Colledani, D., & Robusto, E. (2019). A comparison of classical and modern measures of internal consistency. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02714
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anselmi, P., Vidotto, G., Bettinardi, O., & Bertolotti, G. (2015). Measurement of change in health status with Rasch models. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0197-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R. C. (1990). Repertory grids as mental tests: Implications of test theories for grids. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 3(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720539008412799
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. C. (1997). (June). Using SPSS to analyse repertory grid data. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Congress on Personal Construct Psychology, Barcelona (Vol. 2, p. 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. C. (2000). On testing the commonality of constructs in supplied grids. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 13(4), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720530050130111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R. C. (2004). When is my grid cognitively complex and when is it simple? Some approaches to deciding. Personal Construct Theory and Practice, 1, 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. C. (2009). iGRIDSTAT: A program for analyzing the data of a repertory grid (Italian Version) [Computer software]. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Borell, K., Espwall, M., Pryce, J., & Brenner, S. O. (2003). The repertory grid technique in social work research, practice, and education. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 2(4), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325003024006
   Google Scholar
• Caputi, P., & Reddy, P. (1999). A comparison of triadic and dyadic methods of personal construct elicitation. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 12(3), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/107205399266109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colledani, D., Anselmi, P., & Robusto, E. (2018). Using Item Response Theory for the development of a new short form of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1834. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colledani, D., Anselmi, P., & Robusto, E. (2019a). Development of a new abbreviated form of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised with multidimensional item response theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colledani, D., Anselmi, P., & Robusto, E. (2019b). Using multidimensional item response theory to develop an abbreviated form of the Italian version of Eysenck's IVE questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 142, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colledani, D., Robusto, E., & Anselmi, P. (2018). Development of a new abbreviated form of the Junior Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottrell, W. N., Denaro, C. P., & Emmerton, L. (2013). Exploring beliefs about heart failure treatment in adherent and nonadherent patients: Use of the repertory grid technique. Patient Prefer Adherence, 7, 141–150. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S40725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epting, F. R., Prichard, S., Wiggins, S. C., Leonard, J. A., & Beagle, J. W. (1992). Assessment of the first factor and related measures of construct differentiation. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 5(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/08936039208404942
   Google Scholar
• Fransella, F. (2003). International handbook of personal construct psychology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Fransella, F. E. (2005). The essential practitioner's handbook of personal construct psychology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Fransella, F., Bell, R., & Bannister, D. (2004). A manual for repertory grid technique (2nd ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Herrán-Alonso, J., Saúl, L. A., Perea-Luque, J. R., & López-González, M. A. (2020). A principal components analysis of grid differentiation measures. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2020.1815111
   Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahler, E., Rogausch, A., Brunner, E., & Himmel, W. (2008). A parametric analysis of ordinal quality-of-life data can lead to erroneous results. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(5), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.05.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vols. 1 and 2). Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration (or person measure) stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7(4), 328.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (1997). KR-20/Cronbach alpha or Rasch person reliability: Which tells the “truth”? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 11(3), 580–581.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2002a). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2002b). What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16(2), 878.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2016). Winsteps® (Version 3.92.0) [computer software]. Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• MacCormick, A., Macmillan, A., & Parry, B. (2004). Identification of criteria for the prioritisation of patients for elective general surgery. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 9(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1258/135581904322716085
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marsden, D., & Littler, D. (2000). Exploring consumer product construct systems with the repertory grid technique. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 3(3), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750010333889
   Google Scholar
• Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merbitz, C., Morris, J., & Grip, J. C. (1989). Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70(4), 308–312. doi:10.5555/uri:pii:0003999389901512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, F. M., Jones, H. G., & Norris, H. (1970). Articulation of the conceptual structure in obsessional neurosis. The British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(3), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1970.tb00672.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostini, R., & Nering, M. L. (2006). Polytomous item response theory models. Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, B., & Ryals, L. (2007). Using the repertory grid to access the underlying realities in key account relationships. International Journal of Market Research, 49(5), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530704900506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, P. (1964). The principal components of a repertory grid. Vincent Andrew.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. E. (2001). Evidence for the reliability of measures and validity of measure interpretation: A Rasch measurement perspective. Journal of Applied Measurement, 2(3), 281–311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Fallowfield, L. J., Velikova, G., & Sharpe, M. (2008). Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spengler, P. M., & Strohmer, D. C. (1994). Stability of a 4 × 6 repertory grid for measuring cognitive complexity. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 7(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720539408405074
   Google Scholar
• Suen, H. K. (1990). Principles of test theories. Hillsdale.
   Google Scholar
• Tennant, A. (2004). Disordered thresholds: An example from the functional independence measure. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 17, 945–948.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. L. (2011). The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: A review. Assessment, 18(3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110374797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, T. A., & Harvey, R. J. (2006). Development of a new critical thinking test using item response theory. Psychological Assessment, 18(1), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.1.100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W.-C., & Chen, C.-T. (2005). Item parameter recovery, standard error estimates, and fit statistics of the WINSTEPS program for the family of Rasch models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(3), 376–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404268673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winsteps.com. Retrieved from http://www.winsteps.com/
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., & Douglas, G. A. (1977). Best procedures for sample-free item analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(2), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100216
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. MESA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., & Panchapakesan, N. (1969). A procedure for sample-free item analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446902900102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. MESA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B., & Stone, M. (1999). Measurement essentials (2nd ed.). Wide Range, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zanon, C., Hutz, C. S., Yoo, H. H., & Hambleton, R. K. (2016). An application of item response theory to psychological test development. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 29(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0040-x
   Google Scholar