References
- Baro, E. E., Godfrey, V. Z., & Eze, M. E. (2014). Electronic theses and dissertations initiatives: A survey of university libraries in Nigeria. International Information & Library Review, 46(1–2), 41–50. doi:10.1080/10572317.2014.936265
- Batooli, Z., Ravandi, S. N., & Bidgoli, M. S. (2016). Evaluation of scientific outputs of Kashan university of medical sciences in scopus citation database based on scopus, researchgate, and mendeley scientometric measures. Electronic Physician, 8(2), 2048. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821323/pdf/epj-08-2048.pdf doi:10.19082/2048
- Björk, B., Laakso, M., Welling, P., & Paetau, P. (2013). Anatomy of green open access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, (Pre-print). Retrieved from http://www.openaccesspublishing.org/apc8/Personal VersionGreenOa.pdf
- Borrego, Á. (2017). Institutional repositories versus ResearchGate: The depositing habits of Spanish researchers. Learned Publishing, 30(3), 185–192. doi:10.1002/leap.1099
- Crow, R. (2002). The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper. Washington, DC: The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition.
- Covey, D. T. (2011). Recruiting content for the institutional repository: The barriers exceed the benefits. Journal of Digital Information, 12(3). Retrieved from https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/2068
- Dorsch, I. (2017). Relative visibility of authors’ publications in different information services. Scientometrics, 112(2), 917–925. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2416-9
- Ezema, I., & Ugwu, C. (2013). Electronic theses and dissertations in Nigeria university libraries: Status, challenges, and strategies. The Electronic Library, 31(4), 493–507. doi:10.1108/EL-08-2011-0118
- Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. Faseb Journal: Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 22(2), 338–342. doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
- Gandel, P. B., Katz, R. N. & Metros, S. E. (2004). The “Weariness of the flesh”: Reflections on the life of the mind in an era of abundance. Educause Review 39, 40–51. Retrieved from www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0423.pdf
- Gasparyan, A. Y. (2013). Bibliographic databases: Some critical points. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 28(6), 799–800. doi:10.3346/jkms.2013.28.6.799
- Gasparyan, A. Y., Ayvazyan, L., Blackmore, H., & Kitas, G. D. (2011). Writing a narrative biomedical review: Considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatology International, 31(11), 1409. doi:10.1007/s00296-011-1999-3
- Gasparyan, A. Y., Ayvazyan, L., & Kitas, G. D. (2013). Multidisciplinary bibliographic databases. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 28(9), 1270–1275. doi:10.3346/jkms.2013.28.9.1270
- Gibbons, S. (2009). Benefits of an institutional repository. Library Technology Reports, 40(4), 11–16.
- Glänzel, W., Heeffer, S., & Thijs, B. (2016). A triangular model for publication and citation statistics of individual authors. Scientometrics, 107(2), 857–872. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1870-0
- Glossary, Digital Repository university library (2014). The University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign. Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/
- Hixson, C. (2006). If we build it, will they come (eventually)? Scholarly communication and institutional repositories. The Serials Librarian, 50 (1–2), 197–209. doi:10.1300/J123v50n01_18
- Kulkarni, A. V., Aziz, B., Shams, I., & Busse, J. W. (2009). Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(10), 1092–1096. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1307
- Linde, F., & Stock, W. G. (2011). Information Markets. A Strategic Guideline for the I-Commerce, De Gruyter Saur, Berlin.
- Lynch, C. A. (2003). Institutional repositories: Essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), 327–336. doi:10.1353/pla.2003.0039
- Markey, K., Rieh, S. Y., St. Jean, B., Kim, J., & Yakel, E. (2007). Census of Institutional Repositories in the United States: MIRACLE Project Research Findings. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
- Minčić-Obradović, K. (2011). E-books in Academic Libraries. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing.
- Mutula, S. (2004). IT diffusion in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for developing and managing digital libraries. New Library World, 105(7/8), 281–289. doi:10.1108/03074800410551039
- National Universities Commission (NUC) (2018), Retrieved from http://nuc.edu.ng/
- Okumu, O. D. (2015). Adoption of institutional repositories in dissemination of scholarly information in universities in Kenya with reference to United States International University, Africa. (Unpublished Master Projects) University of Nairobi. Retrieved from http://Erepository.Uonbi.Ac.Ke/Bitstream/Handle/11295/93088/Ogenga_Adoption%20of20institutional%20repositories%20in%20dissemination%20of.Pdf?Sequence=1&Isallowed=Y
- OpenDOAR (2009). OpenDOAR chart: Usage of open access repository software – worldwide. Retrieved June 24, 2018, from the University of Nottingham, http://www.opendoar.org/onechart.php?groupby=r.rSoftWareName&orderby=Tally%20DESC&charttype=pie&width=600&height=300&caption=Usage%20of%20Open%20Access%20Repository%20Software%20-%20Worldwide
- ResearchGate (2014). Researchgate - who we are. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/aboutus.AboutUsPress.downloadFile.html?name=rg_fact_sheet.pdf
- Smith, C., Davis, D., & Staples, T. (2008). Fedora Commons community registry. Retrieved from https://fedoracommons.org/confluence/display/FCCommReg/Fedora+Commons+Community+Registry
- Smith, D. R., & Watson, R. (2016). Career development tips for today's nursing academic: bibliometrics, altmetrics, and social media. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(11), 2654–2661. doi:10.1111/jan.13067
- Suh, C. O., Oh, S. J., & Hong, S. T. (2012). Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors at the forefront of improving the quality and indexing chances of its member journals. European Science Editing, 38(4), 648–650.
- Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2017). ResearchGate versus Google Scholar: Which finds more early citations?. Scientometrics, 112(2), 1125–1131. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2400-4