72
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Missile defense: More may be better—for China

Pages 68-81 | Published online: 05 Feb 2008

References

  • U.S. Ballistic Missile Defense Agency, “The Ballistic Missile Defense System,” http://www.acq.osd.mil/bmdo/bmdolink/html/system.html (http://www.acq.osd.mil/bmdo/bmdolink/html/system.html)
  • Cordesman , Anthony H. July 2000 . “China and the US: National Missile Defenses and Chinese Nuclear Modernization,” . July , 15 – 16 . Washington DC : Center for Strategic and International Studies Background Paper .
  • Bin , Li . 2000 . “BMD and the Missile Technology Control Regime,” . paper presented at the Conference on East Asian Regional Security Futures: Theater Missile Defense Implications . June 24–25 2000 , Tokyo, Japan. The United Nations University . <http://www.nautilus.org/nukepolicy/TMD‐Conference/LiBinpaper.html>
  • O'Hanlon , Michael . 2000 . “Why China Cannot Conquer Taiwan,” . International Security , 25 Fall : 51 – 86 .
  • Cohen , William S. 1999 . “The Security Situation in the Taiwan Strait,” . Report to Congress Pursuant to the FY1999 Appropriations Bill . February 26 1999 , Washington, DC.
  • O'Hanlon . “Why China Cannot Successfully Invade Taiwan,” . 52
  • Gertz , Bill . 2002 . “Chinese Missiles Concern Pentagon,” . Washington Times, , April 3
  • U.S. Department of Defense . June 2000 . “Annual Report on the Military Power of the People's Republic of China,” . June , Washington, DC : Report Pursuant to the FY2000 National Defense Authorization Act .
  • Allen , Kenneth W. June 2000 . “Theater Missile Defenses in the Asia‐Pacific Region,” . Henry L. Stimson Center Working Group Report No. 34 June , 46 – 47 . Washington, DC <http://www.stimson.org/japan/pdf/TMDReport.pdf>
  • Zukang , Sha . 1999 . “Some Thoughts on Non‐Proliferation,” . Presentation at the Seventh Annual Carnegie International Peace Non‐Proliferation Conference . January 12 1999 , Washington, DC. <http://www.ceip.org/files/events/Conf99Sha.asp?p=8&EventID=156>
  • “The Taiwan Question and Reunification of China,” Taiwan Affairs Office and Information Office, PRC State Council, August 1993, http://English.peopledaily.com.cn/whitepaper/7.html (http://English.peopledaily.com.cn/whitepaper/7.html)
  • Federation of American Scientists, “Beijing Claims ‘China Has Sovereignty over Taiwan’,” http://www.fas.org/man/dod‐101/ops/docs99/890910–1.htm (http://www.fas.org/man/dod‐101/ops/docs99/890910–1.htm)
  • 1979 . Taiwan Relations Act, U.S. Public Law 96–8, 96th Cong., 1st session . April 10 1979 .
  • Chen , Edwin and Chu , Henry . 2001 . “Bush Remarks On Taiwan Defense Cause a Furor Over U.S. Policy,” . Los Angeles Times, , April 26
  • Zukang , Ambassador Sha . 2000 . “U.S. Missile Defence Plans: China's View,” . Disarmament Diplomacy , January/February <http://www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd43/43usnmd.htm>
  • Saunders , Phillip C. 2000 . “Project Strait Talk: Security and Stability in the Taiwan Strait,” . Seminar Report, Center for Nonproliferation Studies . July 27 2000 , Monterey, CA. Monterey Institute of International Studies . <http://cns.miis.edu/cns/projects/eanp/research/strait/index.htm>
  • U.S. House of Representatives, Subcommittee on East Asia and the Pacific, Committee on International Relations . 2001 . “Testimony by Bonnie S. Glaser on U.S.‐China Relations and the Taiwan Strait in the Aftermath of September 11,” . 107th Congress, 1 st Session . November 15 2001 .
  • Payne , Keith B. 2001 . “Post‐Cold War Deterrence and a Taiwan Crisis,” . China Brief , I September 12 <http://china.jamestown.org/pubs/view/cwe_001_005_003.htm>
  • Christensen , Thomas . 2000 . “Clarity on Taiwan: Correcting Misperceptions on Both Sides of the Strait,” . Washington Post, , March 20
  • U.S. Department of Defense . October 27 1998 . “Background Briefing for Trip by U.S. Secretary of Defense to the Far East,” . October 27 , <http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Oct1998/x10281998_x027bkg_.html>
  • National Institute of Defense Studies (Japan) . 2000 . East Asian Strategic Review 2000 Tokyo : The National Institute of Defense Studies, . Chapter 20
  • Wall , Robert . 1999 . “U.S., Japan Agree on Cooperative Missile Defense,” . Aviation Week and Space Technology, , August 23
  • Amano , Yukiya . 2002 . “A Japanese View on Nuclear Disarmament,” . Nonproliferation Review , 9 Spring : 143 – 44 .
  • Security Consultative Committee . September 23 1997 . “Completion of the Review of the Guidelines for U.S.‐Japan Defense Cooperation,” . September 23 , New York, NY
  • Halperin , Morton . 1999 . “The Nuclear Dimension of the U.S.‐Japan Alliance,” . Paper prepared for the Nautilus Institute . July 9 1999 , Berkeley, CA. <http://www.nautiIus.org/nukepolicy/Halperin/index.html>
  • Kaneko , Kumao . 1996 . “Japan Needs No Umbrella,” . Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists , 52 March/April : 46 – 51 . <http://www.thebulletin.Org/issues/1996/ma96/ ma96kaneko.html>
  • National Intelligence Council . December 2001 . “Foreign Missile Developments and the Ballistic Missile Threat Through 2015,” . December , <http://www.cia.gov/nic/pubs/other_products/Unclassifiedballisticmissilefinal.htm> or <http://www.fas.org/irp/nic/bmthreat‐2015.htm>
  • National Intelligence Council . December 2001 . “Foreign Missile Developments and the Ballistic Missile Threat Through 2015,” . December ,
  • National Intelligence Council . September 2000 . “Foreign Missile Developments and the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States Through 2015,” . September , <http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/nie/nie99msl.html>
  • Sessler , Andrew M. 2000 . Countermeasures: A Technical Evaluation of the Operational Effectiveness of the Planned U.S. National Missile Defense System, , Cambridge : Union of Concerned Scientists, April .
  • Lewis , George . 1999–2000 . “National Missile Defense: An Indefensible System,” . Foreign Policy, , Winter : 124 – 28 .
  • Sirak , Michael . 2001 . “BMD Takes Shape,” . Jane's Defense Weekly, , April 18
  • Sanger , David E. 2001 . “U.S. To Tell China It Will Not Object To Missile Buildup,” . New York Times, , September 2
  • Allen , Mike . 2001 . “U.S. To Give Details Of Shield Tests To China,” . Washington Post, , September 2
  • 2001 . “Russia Says U.S. Antimissile Plan Means an Arms Race,” . New York Times, , February 6
  • Mo , Zhang . 2001 . “Birth of Shanghai Cooperation Organization,” . Jiefang Daily (Shanghai) , June 16 : 5
  • Isachenkov , Vladimir . July 17 2001 . “China Leader: Security Is Treaty Goal,” . July 17 , Moscow : The Associated Press .
  • Garnett , Sherman . 2001 . “Challenges of the Sino‐Russian Strategic Partnership,” . Washington Quarterly , 24 Autumn
  • Tyler , Patrick E. 2001 . “Behind the Shield, a 3‐Sided Rivalry,” . New York Times, , May 6
  • Manning , Robert . 2000 . China, Nuclear Weapons, and Arms Control; A Preliminary Assessment 1 New York : Council on Foreign Relations, .
  • Waltz , Kenneth . 1979 . Theory of International Politics Reading, MA : Addison‐Wesley, .
  • Garnett , Sherman . 2001 . “Challenges of the Sino‐Russian Strategic Partnership,” . Washington Quarterly , 24 ( 4 ) Autumn : 41
  • Mufson , Steven . 2001 . “Postponement Shows Shift in Priorities,” . Washington Post, , October 26
  • Sanger , David E. 2002 . “Bush and Putin to Sign Treaty to Cut Nuclear Warheads,” . The New York Times, , May 14
  • Purdum , Todd S. 2002 . “NATO Countries Approve Pact Giving Russia Role of a Partner,” . The New York Times, , May 15
  • Baker , Gerald . 2001 . “Old Alliances Provide Warmest Enthusiasts for New World Order,” . Financial Times, , October 22
  • Baker , Gerard and Kynge , James . 2001 . “A recast relationship with Beijing,” . Financial Times, , October 19
  • Lam , Willy Wo‐Lap . 2002 . “'Beijing's NATO’ Hits Stumbling Block,” . CNN.com, , May 16
  • Huntley , Wade . 1995 . “Who Won the Cold War?” . In The Power of Words: Documents in American History Edited by: Breen , Timothy . New York : Harper Collins, .
  • I am grateful for the innumerable helpful comments and suggestions on early drafts of this article from many colleagues, and for the invaluable constructive critiques from the anonymous reviews.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.