Age-Related Alterations of Active Pumping Mechanisms in Rat Thoracic Duct

REFERENCES

• Allen J M, Iggulden H L, McHale N G. Beta-adrenergic inhibition of bovine mesenteric lymphatics. J Physiol 1986; 374: 401–411
   Google Scholar
• Arenas I A, Xu Y, Davidge S T. Age-associated impairment in vasorelaxation to fluid shear stress in the female vasculature is improved by tnf-alpha antagonism. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006; 290: H1259–H1263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit J N, Zawieja D C. Gastrointestinal lymphatics. Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, 3rd ed., L Johnson. Raven, New York 1994; 1669–1692
   Google Scholar
• Benoit J N, Zawieja D C, Goodman A H, Granger H J. Characterization of intact mesenteric lymphatic pump and its responsiveness to acute edemagenic stress. Am J Physiol 1989; 257: H2059–H2069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borisov A V. The theory of the design of the lymphangion. [Russian]. Morfologiia 1997; 112: 7–17
   Google Scholar
• Brandon Dixon J, Greiner S T, Gashev A A, Cote G L, Moore J E, Zawieja D C. Lymph flow, shear stress, and lymphocyte velocity in rat mesenteric prenodal lymphatics. Microcirculation 2006; 13: 597–610
   Google Scholar
• Bridenbaugh E A, Gashev A A, Zawieja D C. Lymphatic muscle: a review of contractile function. Lymphat Res Biol 2003; 1: 147–158
   Google Scholar
• Datte J Y, Yapo P A, Offoumou M A. Nitric oxide effect on 5-hydroxytryptamine-induced vasoconstrictions of isolated smooth muscle. Pharmacol Rep 2005; 57: 113–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis M J. An improved, computer-based method to automatically track internal and external diameter of isolated microvessels. Microcirculation 2005; 12: 361–372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis M J, Zawieja D C, Gashev A A. Automated measurement of diameter and contraction waves of cannulated lymphatic microvessels. Lymphat Res Biol 2006; 4: 3–10
   Google Scholar
• Gashev A A. The pump function of the lymphangion and the effect on it of different hydrostatic conditions. [Russian]. Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I.M Sechenova 1989; 75: 1737–1743
   Google Scholar
• Gashev A A. Physiologic aspects of lymphatic contractile function: current perspectives. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002; 979: 178–187, discussion 188–196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gashev A A, Davis M J, Delp M D, Zawieja D C. Regional variations of contractile activity in isolated rat lymphatics. Microcirculation 2004; 11: 477–492
   Google Scholar
• Gashev A A, Davis M J, Zawieja D C. Inhibition of the active lymph pump by flow in rat mesenteric lymphatics and thoracic duct. J Physiol 2002; 540: 1023–1037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gashev A A, Delp M D, Zawieja D C. Inhibition of active lymph pump by simulated microgravity in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006; 290: H2295–H2308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gashev A A, Orlov R S, Borisov A V, Kliuchin'ski T, Andreevskaya M V, Bubnova N A, Borisova R P, Andreev Y A, Erofeev N P, Priklonskaya E G. The mechanisms of lymphangion interaction in the process of the lymph movement. [Russian]. Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova 1990; 76: 1489–1508
   Google Scholar
• Gashev A A, Zawieja D C. Physiology of human lymphatic contractility: a historical perspective. Lymphology 2001; 34: 124–134
   Google Scholar
• Gasheva O Y, Gashev A A, Zawieja D C. Imposed flow-dependent inhibition in rat thoracic duct is not dependent on K channel blockade. FASEB J 2007; 21: A485-a
   Google Scholar
• Gasheva O Y, Zawieja D C, Gashev A A. Contraction-initiated no-dependent lymphatic relaxation: a self-regulatory mechanism in rat thoracic duct. J Physiol 2006; 575: 821–832
   Google Scholar
• Gnepp D R. Lymphatics. Edema, N C Staub, A E Taylor. Raven, New York 1984; 263–298
   Google Scholar
• Granger H J, Kovalcheck S, Zweifach B W, Barnes G E. Quantitative analysis of active lymphatic pumping. Proceedings of the VII Summer Computer Simulation Conference. Simulation Council, La Jolla, CA 1977; 562–565
   Google Scholar
• Hargens A R, Zweifach B W. Contractile stimuli in collecting lymph vessels. Am J Physiol 1977; 233: H57–H65
   Google Scholar
• Hayes H, Kossmann E, Wilson E, Meininger C, Zawieja D. Development and characterization of endothelial cells from rat microlymphatics. Lymphat Res Biol 2003; 1: 101–119
   Google Scholar
• Hill C E, Gould D J. Pathway-specific effects of calcitonin gene-related peptide on irideal arterioles of the rat. J Physiol 1997; 505: 797–809
   Google Scholar
• Hollywood M A, Cotton K D, Thornbury K D, McHale N G. Tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium current in sheep lymphatic smooth muscle. J Physiol 1997; 503: 13–20
   Google Scholar
• Kuo L, Davis M J, Chilian W M. Endothelium-dependent, flow-induced dilation of isolated coronary arterioles. Am J Physiol 1990; 259: H1063–H1070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchetti C, Casasco A, Di Nucci A, Reguzzoni M, Rosso S, Piovella F, Calligaro A, Polak J. Endothelin and nitric oxide synthase in lymphatic endothelial cells: immunolocalization in vivo and in vitro. Anat Rec 1997; 248: 490–497
   Google Scholar
• McHale N G. Lymphatic innervation. Blood Vessels 1990; 27: 127–136
   Google Scholar
• McHale N G. The lymphatic circulation. Ir J Med Sci 1992; 161: 483–486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHale N G, Roddie I C. The effect of transmural pressure on pumping activity in isolated bovine lymphatic vessels. J Physiol 1976; 261: 255–269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meininger G A, Zawieja D C, Falcone J C, Hill M A, Davey J P. Calcium measurement in isolated arterioles during myogenic and agonist stimulation. Am J Physiol 1991; 261: H950–H959
   Google Scholar
• Mislin H. Experimental detection of autochthonous automatism of lymph vessels. [German]. Experientia 1961; 17: 29–30
   Google Scholar
• Mislin H. The contractile properties of lymphatic vessels. [German]. Angiologica 1971; 8: 207–211
   Google Scholar
• Mislin H, Schipp R (1966) Structural and functional relations of the lymph vessels. Progress in Lymphology; Proceedings of the International symposium on lymphology, ZurichSwitzerland, July, 19–231966, 360–365
   Google Scholar
• Mizuno R, Koller A, Kaley G. Regulation of the vasomotor activity of lymph microvessels by nitric oxide and prostaglandins. Am J Physiol 1998; 274: R790–R796
   Google Scholar
• Muthuchamy M, Gashev A, Boswell N, Dawson N, Zawieja D. Molecular and functional analyses of the contractile apparatus in lymphatic muscle. FASEB J 2003; 17: 920–922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakaike R, Shimokawa H, Yasutake H, Sumimoto H, Ito A, Numaguchi K, Egashira K, Takeshige K, Takeshita A. Effects of L-arginine analogues on vasomotion of isolated porcine coronary arteries. Am J Physiol 1995; 268: H1966–H1972
   Google Scholar
• Ohhashi T, Azuma T. Physiological and pharmacological characteristics of isolated bovine mesenteric lymphatics. Vascular Neuroeffector Mechanisms. 1980; 322–323
   Google Scholar
• Ohhashi T, Mizuno R, Ikomi F, Kawai Y. Current topics of physiology and pharmacology in the lymphatic system. Pharmacol Ther 2005; 105: 165–188
   Google Scholar
• Orlov R S, Borisov A V, Borisova R P. Lymphatic vessels. Structure and mechanisms of contractile activity. [Russian]. Nauka, LeningradUSSR 1983
   Google Scholar
• Orlov R S, Lobov G I. Ionic mechanisms of the electrical activity of the smooth-muscle cells of the lymphatic vessels. [Russian]. Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova 1984; 70: 712–721
   Google Scholar
• Rees D D, Palmer R M, Schulz R, Hodson H F, Moncada S. Characterization of three inhibitors of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in vitro and in vivo. Br J Pharmacol 1990; 101: 746–752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid-Schönbein G W. Microlymphatics and lymph flow. Physiol Rev 1990; 70: 987–1028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirasawa Y, Ikomi F, Ohhashi T. Physiological roles of endogenous nitric oxide in lymphatic pump activity of rat mesentery in vivo. Am J Physiol 2000; 278: G551–G556
   Google Scholar
• Turner R T, Maran A, Lotinun S, Hefferan T, Evans G L, Zhang M, Sibonga J D. Animal models for osteoporosis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2001; 2: 117–127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unthank J, Bohlen H. Lymphatic pathways and role of valves in lymph propulsion from small intestine. Am J Physio 1988; 254: G389–G398, (3 Pt 1)
   Google Scholar
• Van Helden D F. Pacemaker potentials in lymphatic smooth muscle of the guinea-pig mesentery. J Physiol 1993; 471: 465–479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von d er, Weid P. Review article: Lymphatic vessel pumping and inflammation: the role of spontaneous constrictions and underlying electrical pacemaker potentials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001; 15: 1115–1129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von d er, Weid P Y, Van Helden D F. Beta-adrenoceptor-mediated hyperpolarization in lymphatic smooth muscle of guinea pig mesentery. Am J Physiol 1996; 270: H1687–H1695
   Google Scholar
• Wang A, Nishihashi T, Trandafir C C, Murakami S, Ji X, Shimizu Y, Kurahashi K. Involvement of endothelial cyclo-oxygenase metabolites in noradrenaline-induced contraction of rat coronary artery. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2005; 32: 628–632
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe S, Yashiro Y, Mizuno R, Ohhashi T. Involvement of no and edhf in flow-induced vasodilation in isolated hamster cremasteric arterioles. J Vasc Res 2005; 42: 137–147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoffey J M, Courtice F C. Lymphatics, Lymph and the Lymphomyeloid Complex. Academic Press, London 1970
   Google Scholar
• Zawieja D C, Davis K L. Inhibition of the active lymph pump in rat mesenteric lymphatics by hydrogen peroxide. Lymphology 1993; 26: 135–142
   Google Scholar
• Zawieja D C, Davis K L, Schuster R, Hinds W M, Granger H J. Distribution, propagation, and coordination of contractile activity in lymphatics. Am J Physiol 1993; 264: H1283–H1291
   Google Scholar
• Zawieja D C, Greiner S T, Davis K L, Hinds W M, Granger H J. Reactive oxygen metabolites inhibit spontaneous lymphatic contractions. Am J Physiol 1991; 260: H1935–H1943
   Google Scholar
• Zawieja D C, Kossman E, Pullin J. Dynamics of the microlymphatic system. J Prog Appl Microcirc 1999; 23: 100–109
   Google Scholar