The Synergy of Peirce and Vygotsky as an Analytical Approach to the Multimodality of Semiotic Mediation

REFERENCES

• Bakhurst, D. (2007). Vygotsky’s demons. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 50–76). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. M. (1930). A history of psychology in autobiography, Vol. 1 (C. Murchison, Ed.). New York, NY: Russell & Russell.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, M. (2009). Peirce’s philosophy of communication: The rhetorical underpinnings of the theory of signs. London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1986). Thought and emotion: Can humpty dumpty be put together again? In D. J. Bearison & H. Zimiles (Eds.), Thought and emotion (pp. 11–20). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Colapietro, V. M. (1989). Peirce’s approach to the self: A semiotic perspective on human subjectivity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. (2007). Pedagogy. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 307–331). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1979). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1984). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (2000). Kant and the platypus: Essays on language and cognition ( A. McEwen, Trans.). London, UK: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2007). An interesting resemblance: Vygotsky, Mead, and American pragmatism. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 77–100). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London, UK: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean. London, UK: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London, UK: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1984). Language as code and language as behaviour: A systemic functional interpretation of the nature and ontogenesis of language. In R. Fawcett, M. A. K. Halliday, S. M. Lamb, & A. Makkai (Eds.), The semiotics of culture and language, Vol. 1 (pp. 3–35). London, UK: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London, UK: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93–166.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An Introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed., C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, Rev.). London, UK: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Haneda, M., & Wells, G. (2008). Learning an additional language through dialogic inquiry. Language and Education, 22, 114–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, R. (1985). Context of situation. In M. A. K. Halliday & R. Hasan (Eds.), Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (pp. 3–14). Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, R. (1995). On social conditions for semiotic mediation: The genesis of mind in society. In A. R. Sadovnik (Ed.), Knowledge and pedagogy: The sociology of Basil Bernstein (pp. 171–196). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, R. (1999). Speaking with reference to context. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics (pp. 219–328). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, R. (2002). Semiotic mediation and mental development in pluralistic societies: Some implications for tomorrow’s schooling. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 112–126). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, R. (2005). Semiotic mediation, language and society: Three exotripic theories—Vygotsky, Halliday, and Bernstein. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), Language, society and consciousness: Ruqaiya Hasan (pp. 46–67). London, UK: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, R. (2009). Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics. London, UK: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D. & Lachicotte, W., Jr. (2007). Vygotsky, Mead, and the new sociocultural studies of identity. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 102–135). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• John, C. (2009). Reading lessons: Teacher–pupil interactions with text during three KS1 shared reading sessions. Literacy, 43, 123–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. E. (2001). The ideal in cultural-historical activity theory: Issues and perspectives. In S. Chaiklin (Ed.), The theory and practice of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 283–315). Oxford, UK: Aarhas University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kockelman, P. (2005). The semiotic stance. Semiotica: Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, 157, 233–304.
   Google Scholar
• Kozulin, A. (1986). Vygotsky in context. In L. Vygotsky, Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans. & Ed., pp. xi–lvi). London, UK: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London, UK: Hodder Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kristeva, J. (1986). The Kristeva reader ( T. Moi, Ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Sociocultural theory and L2: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 67–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P. (2007). Sociocultural source of thinking and its relevance for second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 31–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15, 11–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (1995). Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (1997). Cognition, context, and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In D. Kirshner (Ed.), Situated cognitive theory: Social, neurological, and semiotic perspectives (pp. 37–55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (2000a). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 273–290.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (2000b). Material sign processes and emergent ecosocial organization. In P. B. Andersen, C. Emmeche, N. O. Finnemann, & P. V. Christiansen (Eds.), Downward causation: Minds, bodies and matter (pp. 181–213). Århus, the Netherlands: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (2009). Discursive technologies and the social organization of meaning. Folia Linguistica, 35, 79–96.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (2011). Review of Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics (R. Hasan 2009). Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 4, 314–320.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2009). Intersemiotic texture: Analyzing cohesive devices between language and images. Social Semiotics, 19, 367–388.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Vadeboncoeur, J. A. (2010). Bilingual intertextuality: The joint construction of bi-literacy practices between parent and child. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17, 367–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J. (2008). Reading the word and the world: How mind and culture are mediated through the use of dual-language storybooks. Special issue: Teaching and learning as a sociocultural approach. Education 3–13, 36, 237–251.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J. (2013). Exploring the complementary effect of post-structuralism on sociocultural theory of mind and activity. Social Semiotics, 23, 444–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Martinec, R. (1998). Cohesion in action. Semiotica, 120, 161–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misak, C. (2004). Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914). In C. Misak (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Peirce (pp. 1–26). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Parmentier, R. J. (1985). Sign’s place in medias res: Peirce’s concept of semiotic mediation. In E. Mertz & R. J. Parmentier (Eds.), Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives (pp. 23–48). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1932). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 2 (C. Hartsborne & P. Weiss, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1934). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 5 (C. Hartsborne & P. Weiss, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 8 (A. Burks, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1998a). The basis of pragmaticism in the normative sciences. In Peirce Edition Project (Ed.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (pp. 371–397). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1998b). On the logic of drawing history from ancient documents, especially from testimonies. In Peirce Edition Project (Ed.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (pp. 74–114). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1998c). Pragmatism. In Peirce Edition Project (Ed.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (pp. 398–433). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1998d). Sundry logical conceptions. In Peirce Edition Project (Ed.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (pp. 267–288). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1998e). What is a sign? In Peirce Edition Project (Ed.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (pp. 4–10). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perinat, A. (2007). Comparative development of communication: an evolutionary perspective. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 140–163). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prawat, R. S. (1999a). Cognitive theory at the crossroads: Head fitting, head splitting, or somewhere in between? Human Development, 42, 59–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prawat, R. S. (1999b). Social constructivism and the process-content distinction as viewed by Vygotsky and the pragmatists. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6, 255–273.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, A., & Valsiner, J. (2007). Socio-cultural psychology on the move: Semiotic methodology in the making. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 692–707). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Royce, T. D. (2007). Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. In T. D. Royce & W. L. Bowcher (Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp. 63–109). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sebeok, T. A., & Danesi, M. (2000). The forms of meaning: Modelling systems theory and semiotic analysis. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Sebeok, T. A. (2001). Global semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Short, T. L. (2007). Peirce’s theory of signs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spinoza, B. (2001). Ethics ( W. H. White, Trans., & A. H. Stirling, Rev.). Hertfordshire, UK: Wordsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thibault, P. J. (2004). Brain, mind and the signifying body: An ecosocial semiotic theory. London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J., & Rosa, A. (2007). Contemporary socio-cultural research. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 1–20). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J., & van der Veer, R. (2000). The social mind: Construction of the idea. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak & M. Mayr (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95–120). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. (1999). Speech, music, sound. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. London, UK: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1981). The instrumental method in psychology. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 134–143). New York, NY: Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 1. Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1994). The problem of the environment. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 338–354). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1997a). The instrumental method in psychology. In R. W. Rieber & J. Wollock (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 3. Problems of the theory and history of psychology (pp. 85–89). New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1997b). The problem of consciousness. In R. W. Rieber & J. Wollock (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 3. Problems of the theory and history of psychology (pp. 129–138). New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1997c). The problem of the development of higher mental functions. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 4. The history of the development of higher mental functions (pp. 1–26). New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1997d). Research method. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 4. The history of the development of higher mental functions (pp. 27–63). New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1989). A sociocultural approach to mind: Some theoretical considerations. Cultural Dynamics, 2, 140–161.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1990). The voice of rationality in a sociocultural approach to mind. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications for sociohistorical psychology (pp. 111–126). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178–192). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar