Hands On, Hands Off: Gendered Access in Crafting and Electronics Practices

REFERENCES

• Beaudry, M. C. (2006). Findings: The material culture of needlework and sewing. Princeton, NJ: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berzowska, J. (2005). Electronic textiles: Wearable computers, reactive fashion, and soft computation. Textile: The Journal of Cloth and Culture, 3, 58–75.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buechley, L. (2013). LilyPad Arduino: E-textiles for everyone. In L. Buechley, K. A. Peppler, M. Eisenberg, & Y. B. Kafai (Eds.), Textile messages: Dispatches from the world of e-textiles and education (pp. 17–28). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Buechley, L., & Mako-Hill, B. (2010). LilyPad in the wild: How hardware’s long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems ( pp. 199–207). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buechley, L., Peppler, K. A., Eisenberg, M., & Kafai, Y. B. ( Eds.). (2013). Textile messages: Dispatches from the world of e-textiles and education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. (2001). Theorising the machine: Gender, education and computing. Gender and Education, 13, 307–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. (2013). The Maker mindset. In M. Honey & D. E. Kanter ( Eds.), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators ( pp. 7–11). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, P. N. (1995a). The founders of industrial arts in the US. Journal of Technology Education. 7, 6–21.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, P. N. (1995b). Industrial arts/technology education as a social study: The original intent? Journal of Technology Education, 6(2), 4–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, S., Wiesner, H., & Wiesner-Steiner, A. (2007). Robotics and gender: The use of robotics for the empowerment of girls in the classroom. In I. Zorn, S. Maass, E. Rommes, C. Schirmer, & H. Schelhowe ( Eds.), Gender designs IT: Construction and deconstruction of information society technology ( pp. 175–188). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S., & Thomas, A. P. (2010, April). Squishy circuits: A tangible medium for electronics education. In CHI ‘10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems ( pp. 4099–4104). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kalil, T. (2010). Remarks on innovation, education, and the Maker movement. Retrieved from http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/10/innovation-education-and-the-m.html
   Google Scholar
• Khoja, S., Wainwright, C., Brosing, J., & Barlow, J. (2012). Changing girls’ attitudes towards computer science. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 28, 210–216.
   Google Scholar
• Marcu, G., Kaufman, S. J., Lee, J. K., Black, R. W., Dourish, P., Hayes, G. R., & Richardson, D. J. (2010, March). Design and evaluation of a computer science and engineering course for middle school girls. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on computer science education ( pp. 234–238). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Marculescu, D., Marculescu, R., Zamora, N. H., Stanley-Marbell, P., Khosla, P. K., Park, S., … Nakad, Z. (2003). Electronic textiles: A platform for pervasive computing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 91, 1995–2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2003). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paechter, C. (2003). Masculinities and femininities as communities of practice. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26, 69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paechter, C. (2006). Constructing femininity, constructing femininities. In C. Skelton, B. Francis, & L. Smulyan ( Eds.), The Sage handbook of gender and education [Electronic version]. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peppler, K. (2013). STEAM-powered computing education: Using e-textiles to integrate the arts and STEM. Computer, 46, 38–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppler, K., & Glosson, D. (2013). Stitching circuits: Learning about circuitry through e-textile materials. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 751–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, J. & Buechley, L. (2010). Electronic popables: Exploring paper-based computing through an interactive pop-up book. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction ( pp. 121–128). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London, UK: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Stepulevage, L. (2001). Gender/technology relations: Complicating the gender binary. Gender and Education, 13, 325–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1935)
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1991) Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The White House. (2009). Remarks by the president on the “Education to Innovate” campaign. [Press release]. Washington, DC: White House Office of the Press Secretary.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlwend, K. E. (2009). Mediated discourse analysis: Researching young children’s non-verbal interactions as social practice. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 7, 228–243.
   Google Scholar