Toward a Grammar of Collaboration

REFERENCES

• Adler, P. S., & Heckscher, C. (2006). The firm as a collaborative community: Reconstructing trust in the knowledge economy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1982). Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel. In M. M. Bakhtin (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays (pp. 84–258). Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1984a). Problems of Dostoeysky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1984b). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bemong, L., Borghart, P., De Dobbeleer, M., Demoen, K., De Temmerman, K., & Keunen, B. (Eds.). (2010). Bakhtin’s theory of the literary chronotope: Reflections, applications, perspectives. Gent, Belgium: Academia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society,15, 739–768. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyerlein, M. M., Freedman, S., McGee, C., & Moran, L. (2003). Beyond teams: Building the collaborative organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Blee, K. M. (2012). Democracy in the making: How activist groups form. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. (2014). Zapatista corn: A case study in biocultural innovation. Social Studies of Science,44, 874–900. doi:10.1177/0306312714540060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branford, S., & Rocha, J. (2002). Cutting the wire: The story of the landless movement in Brazil. London, UK: Latin America Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chachere, J., Levitt, R., & Kunst, J. (2003). Can you accelerate your project using extreme collaboration? A model based analysis (CIFE Tech. Rep. No. 154). Stanford University, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver, H. (1998). The Zapatistas and the electronic fabric of struggle. In J. Holloway and E. Pelaez (Eds.), Zapatistas! Reinventing revolution in Mexico (pp. 81–103). London, UK: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desmarais, A. A. (2007). La vía campesina: Globalization and the power of peasants. London, UK: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1995). Objects, contradictions and collaboration in medical cognition: An activity-theoretical perspective. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine,7, 395–412. doi:10.1016/0933-3657(95)00012-U
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2007). Enriching the theory of expansive learning: Lessons from journeys toward coconfiguration. Mind, Culture, and Activity,14(1–2), 23–39. doi:10.1080/10749030701307689
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Blackler, F. (2005). On the life of the object. Organization,12, 307–330. doi:10.1177/1350508405051268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., Brown, K., Christopher, C., & Gregory, J. (1991). Coordination, cooperation and communication in courts: Expansive transitions in legal work. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition,13, 88–97.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., Kajamaa, A., & Nummijoki, J. (2015). Double stimulation in everyday work: Critical encounters between home care workers and their elderly clients. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 48–61. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.005
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., Nummijoki, J., & Sannino, A. (2012). Embodied germ cell at work: Building an expansive concept of physical mobility in home care. Mind, Culture, and Activity,19, 287–309. doi:10.1080/10749039.2012.688177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., Puonti, A., & Seppänen, L. (2003). Spatial and temporal expansion of the object as a challenge for reorganizing work. In D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 151–186). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London, UK: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilliker, L. (2002). In the modernist mirror: Jacques Tati and the Parisian landscape. The French Review,76, 318–329.
   Google Scholar
• Holt-Giménez, E. (2006). Campesino a campesino: Voices from Latin America’s farmer-to-farmer movement for sustainable agriculture. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.
   Google Scholar
• Holt-Giménez, E., Patel, R., & Shattuck, A. (2009). Food rebellions! Crisis and the hunger for justice. Cape Town, South Africa: Pambazuka Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S. (2013). Social movements and their technologies: Wiring social change. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nummijoki, J., & Engeström, Y. (2009). Towards co-configuration in home care of the elderly: Cultivating agency by designing and implementing the mobility agreement. In H. Daniels, A. Edwards, Y. Engeström, T. Gallagher, & S. R. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Activity theory in practice: Promoting learning across boundaries and agencies (pp. 49–71). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rabardel, P., & Bourmaud, G. (2003). From computer to instrument system: A developmental perspective. Interacting with Computers,15, 665–691. doi:10.1016/S0953-5438(03)00058-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, A. (2005). Myth and the Zapatista movement: Exploring a network identity. New Media & Society, 7(4), 559–577.
   Google Scholar
• Sannino, A. (in press). The principle of double stimulation: A path to volitional action. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (Eds.). (2009). Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sannino, A., & Laitinen, A. (2015). Double stimulation in the waiting experiment: Testing a Vygotskian model of the emergence of volitional action. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 4–18. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. (2012). Together: The rituals, pleasures and politics of cooperation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (1996). Working together: Symbolic interactionism, activity theory, and information systems. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 296–318). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values,35, 601–617. doi:10.1177/0162243910377624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’, and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science,19, 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. (1993). Continual permutations of action. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Trompette, P., & Vinck, D. (2009). Revisiting the notion of boundary object. Revue D’anthropologie des Connaissances,3, 3–25. doi:10.3917/rac.006.0003
   Google Scholar
• Tuomela, R. (2000). Cooperation: A philosophical study. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. R. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In R. Van Der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99–174). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wittman, H., Desmarais, A. A., & Wiebe, N. (Eds.). (2010). Food sovereignty: Reconnecting food, nature and community. Halifax, Canada: Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfson, T. (2014). Digital rebellion: The birth of the cyber left. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A., & Wolford, W. (2003). To inherit the earth: The landless movement and the struggle for a new Brazil. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.
   Google Scholar