Boundary Objects Revisited: A Comparative Analysis of World Making in Avant-Garde Fashion Design and Animal Husbandry

REFERENCES

• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Gender and Science: New Issues,28, 801–831.
   Google Scholar
• Bihel, J. (2014, December 3). The right to a non-projected future: Social becomings through law and medicine. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, I. (2012). Alien phenomenology, or what it’s like to be a thing. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, J., & Star, S. L. (1999). Categorical work and boundary infrastructures: Enriching theories of classification. In J. Bowker & S. L. Start (Eds.), Sorting things out, classification and its consequences (pp. 285–315). Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiklin, S. & J. Lave (1993). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crary, J., & Kwinter, S. (1992). The genesis of the individual, Gilbert Simondon. In J. Crary & S. Kwinter (Eds.), Incorporations (pp. 297–319). New York, NY: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, D. (2014). True life, real lives: Revisiting the boundaries between ethnography and fiction. American Ethnologist,41, 40–55. doi:10.1111/amet.12059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaonkar, D. P., & Povinelli, E. A. (2003). Technologies of public forms: Circulation, transfiguration, recognition. Public Culture,15, 385–398. doi:10.1215/08992363-15-3-385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasseni, C. (2009). Good looking: Learning to be a cattle breeder. In C. Grasseni (Ed.), Skilled visions: Between apprenticeships and standards (pp. 47–66). Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Guggenheim, M., Kraeftner, B., & Kroell, J. (2013). ‘I don’t know whether I need a further level of disaster’: Shifting media of sociology in the sandbox. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory,14, 284–304. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2013.838977
   Google Scholar
• Guyer, J. (2007). Prophecy and the near future: Thoughts on macroeconomic, evangelical, and punctuated time. American Ethnologist,34, 409–421. doi:10.1525/ae.2007.34.3.409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyer, J. (2013). “The quickening of the unknown”: Epistemologies of surprise in anthropology. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory,3, 283–307. doi:10.14318/hau3.3.012
   Google Scholar
• Hallam, E., & Ingold, T. ( Eds.). (2014). Making and growing: Anthropological studies of organisms and artefacts. London, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology and the socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2011, May). Speculative fabulations for technoculture’s generation: Taking care of unexpected country. Australian Humanities Review. Retrieved from http://www.australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-May-2011/haraway.html
   Google Scholar
• Hartigan, J. (2014). Aesop’s anthropology: A multispecies approach. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2013). Making. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T., & Hallam, E. (2007). Creativity and cultural improvisation: An introduction. In E. Hallam & T. Ingold (Eds.), Creativity and cultural improvisation (pp. 1–24). Oxford, UK: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T., & Hallam, E. (2014). Making and growing, an introduction. In E. Hallam & T. Ingold (Eds.), Making and growing: Anthropological studies of organisms and artefacts (pp. 1–24). London, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, A. C. (2013). The prototype: More than many, less than one. Journal of Cultural Economy,7, 382–398. doi:10.1080/17530350.2013.858059
   Google Scholar
• Kraeftner, B., Kroell, J., Ramsebner, G., Peschta, L., & Warner, I. (2010). A pillow squirrel and its habitat: Patients, a syndrome, and their dwelling(s). In M. Schillmeier & M. Domenech (Eds.), New technologies and emerging spaces of care (pp. 169–187). London, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1996). Aramis or the love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2008). A cautious Prometheus?” A few steps toward a philosophy of design (with special attention to Peter Sloterdijk). In Networks of design: Proceedings of the 2008 annual international conference of design history society (UK) (pp. 1–13). Boca Raton, FL: Universal Books.
   Google Scholar
• Makovicky, N. (2010). ‘Erotic needlework’: Vernacular designs on the 21st-century market. In A. Clarke ( Ed.), Design anthropology: Object culture in the 21st century (pp. 154–168). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. (2014). Prototyping and contemporary anthropological experiments with ethnographic method. Journal of Cultural Economy,7, 399–410. doi:10.1080/17530350.2013.858061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, S. (2009). Stories and cosmogonies: Imagining creativity beyond ‘nature’ and ‘culture’. Cultural Anthropology,24, 213–245. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2009.01130.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. (2013). A cultural geometry: Designing political things in Sweden. American Ethnologist,40, 118–131. doi:10.1111/amet.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. M., & Marcus, G. E. (2013). Epilogue: Ethnography and design, ethnography in design . . . ethnography by design. In W. Gunn, T. Otto, & R. Charlotte Smith ( Eds.), Design anthropology: Theory and practice (pp. 251–268). New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Ngai, S. (2008). Merely interesting. Critical Inquiry,34, 777–817. doi:10.1086/592544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxson, H. (2008). Post-Pasteurian cultures: The microbiopolitics of raw-milk cheese in the United States. Cultural Anthropology,23,15–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povinelli, E. A. (2011, September 27). Routes/Worlds. e-flux Journal. Retrieved from http://www.e-flux.com/journal/routesworlds/
   Google Scholar
• Procoli, A. (2007). Science in society: Networking knowledge among French geneticists and breeders. Anthropology Today,23, 3–7. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8322.2007.00482.x
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P., & Marcus, G. (2008). Towards an anthropology of the contemporary. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redfield, P. (2012). Bioexpectations: Life technologies as humanitarian goods. Public Culture,24,157–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarry, E. (1985). The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. (2008). Craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, L. (2014). The transplant imaginary: Mechanical hearts, animal parts and moral thinking in highly experimental science. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values,35, 601–617. doi:10.1177/0162243910377624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science,19, 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. (2011). Wondering about materialism. In L. Bryant, N. Srnicek, & G. Harman (Eds.), The speculative turn, continental materialism and realism (pp. 368–380). Melbourne, Australia: Re-press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. (2012). Precarity’s forms. Cultural Anthropology,27, 518–525. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. (2014). Road registers. Cultural Geographies,21, 549–563. doi:10.1177/1474474014525053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1993). Continual permutations of action. New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Taussig, M. (2006). Walter Benjamin’s grave. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J. (in press). The place for synthesis: Vygotsky’s analysis of affective generalization. History of the Human Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, B. (2011). Making pigs local: Discerning the sensory character of place. Cultural Anthropology,26, 438–461. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2011.01106.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Were, G. (2010). Special issue: Prototypes. Visual Communication,9, 267–272. doi:10.1177/1470357210372715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar