On what we call the world and human experience: Rorty, McDowell, and a socio-historical genesis of human naturalness

References

• Bakhurst, D. (1997). Meaning, normativity, and the life of the mind. Language & Communication, 17(1), 33–51. doi:10.1016/S0271-5309(96)00027-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhurst, D. (2005). Il’enkov on education. Studies in East European Thought, 57, 261–275. doi:10.1007/s11212-005-1414-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhurst, D. (2009). Reflections on activity theory. Educational Review, 61(2), 197–210. doi:10.1080/00131910902846916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhurst, D. (2011). The formation of reason. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhurst, D. (2012). Freedom and second nature in The Formation of Reason. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(2), 172–189. doi:10.1080/10749039.2011.649936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhurst, D. (2015). Training, transformation and education. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 76, 301–327. doi:10.1017/S135824611500003X
   Google Scholar
• Bakhurst, D. (2016). Response to Rödl, Standish and Derry. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50(1), 123–129. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12178
   Google Scholar
• Bakhurst, D. (2018). Activity, action and self-consciousness. Educational Review, 70(1), 91–99. doi:10.1080/00131911.2018.1388618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunden, A. (2013). The socio-historical project and the philosophy of education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 20(2), 195–197. doi:10.1080/10749039.2011.635238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W. (2006). Philosophy, methodology and action research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(4), 421–435. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00517.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London, UK: Routledge/Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Caro, M., & Macarthur, D. (2010). Introduction: Science, naturalism, and the problem of normativity. In M. De Caro & D. Macarthur (Eds.), Naturalism and normativity (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derry, J. (2004). The unity of intellect and will: Vygotsky and Spinoza. Educational Review, 56(2), 113–120. doi:10.1080/0031910410001693209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H.-G. (2004) trans. J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall. Truth and method (2nd ed). New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published 1960).
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H.-G. (2008). The universality of the hermeneutical problem. In D. E. Berkeley (Ed. and trans.), Philosophical hermeneutics. Oakland: University of California Press. (Original work published 1966). pp. 3-17.
   Google Scholar
• Ilyenkov, E. (1977). The concept of the ideal, trans. A. Blunden. Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/archive/ilyenkov/works/ideal/ideal.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2003). The American origins of philosophical naturalism. Journal of Philosophical Research, 28(supplement), 83–98. doi:10.5840/jpr200328Supplement28
   Google Scholar
• Macarthur, D. (2004). Naturalizing the human or humanizing nature: Science, nature and the supernatural. Erkenntnis, 61, 29–51. doi:10.1023/B:ERKE.0000037533.27509.c0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macarthur, D. (2010). Taking the human sciences seriously. In M. De Caro & D. Macarthur (Eds.), Naturalism and normativity (pp. 123–141). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macarthur, D. (2014). Subject naturalism, scientism and the problem of linguistic meaning: Critical remarks on Price’s “naturalism without representationalism”. Análisis. Revista De Investigación Filosfófica., 1(1), 69–85. doi:10.26754/ojs_arif/a.rif.20141971
   Google Scholar
• Maiese, M. (2018). Can the mind be embodied, enactive, affective, and extended? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17(2), 343–361. doi:10.1007/s11097-017-9510-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. (1996). Mind and world, 2nd edn, with a new introduction by the author. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1994).
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. (2000a). Towards rehabilitating objectivity. In R. Brandom (Ed.), Rorty and his critics. Philosophers and their critics 9 (pp. 109–123). Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. (2000b). Experiencing the world. In M. Willaschek (Ed.), John McDowell: Reason and nature (pp. 3–18). Münster, Germany: LIT.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. (2000c). Responses. In M. Willaschek (Ed.), John McDowell: Reason and nature (pp. 91–114). Münster, Germany: LIT.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. (2004). Naturalism in the philosophy of mind. In M. De Caro & D. Macarthur (Eds.), Naturalism in question (pp. 91–105). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. (2005a). Reply of John McDowell [to Lilian Alweiss]. In J. Boros (Ed.), Mind in world: Essays on John McDowell’s mind and world (pp. 65–67). Pécs, Hungary: Brambauer. Retrieved from http://www.part-oldalak.hu/kutatas/Essays%20on%20John%20McDowell’s%20Mind%20and%20World.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. (2005b). Reply of John McDowell [to Michael Williams]. In J. Boros (Ed.), Mind in world: Essays on John McDowell’s mind and world (pp. 199–202). Pécs, Hungary: Brambauer. Retrieved from http://www.part-oldalak.hu/kutatas/Essays%20on%20John%20McDowell’s%20Mind%20and%20World.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. (2008). Responses. In J. Lindgaard (Ed.), John McDowell: Experience, norm, and nature (pp. 200–267). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. (2009). Scheme-content dualism and empiricism. In IhisThe engaged intellect: Philosophical essays (pp. 115–133). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1999).
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. (2011). Perception as a capacity for knowledge. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Misawa, K. (2011). The Hirst-Carr debate revisited: Beyond the theory-practice dichotomy. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(4), 689–702. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00830.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misawa, K. (2017). Humans, animals and the world we inhabit—on and beyond the symposium ‘second nature, Bildung and McDowell: David Bakhurst’s The Formation of Reason’. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(4), 744–759. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misawa, K. (2019). The social, the natural and the educational. In T. Feldges (Ed.), Philosophy and the study of education: New perspectives on a complex relationship (pp. 91–103). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peregrin, J. (2018). Davidson and sellars on “two images”. Philosophia, 46(1), 183–192. doi: 10.1007/s11406-017-9902-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1979).
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1982). The world well lost. In Consequences of pragmatism: Essays, 1972–1980 (pp. 3–18). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1972).
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1997). Introduction. In W. Sellars, with an introduction by R. Rorty, and a study guide by R. Brandom, Empiricism and the philosophy of mind (pp. 1–12). Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1998a). Introduction. In Truth and progress: Philosophical papers (Vol. 3, pp.1–15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1998b). The very idea of human answerability to the world: John McDowell’s version of empiricism. In Truth and progress: Philosophical papers (Vol. 3, pp.138–152). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (2000a). Response to John McDowell. In R. Brandom (Ed.), Rorty and his critics (pp. 123–128). Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (2000b). Universality and truth. In R. B. Brandom (Ed.), Rorty and his critics (pp. 1–30). Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (2005). Richard Rorty. In T. Mautner (Ed.), The penguin dictionary of philosophy (2nd ed., pp. 539). London, UK: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (2010). Naturalism and quietism. In M. De Caro & D. Macarthur (Eds.), Naturalism and normativity (pp. 55–68). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellars, W. (1991). Philosophy and the scientific image of man. In Science, perception and reality (pp. 7–43). Atascadero, California: Ridgeview. (Original work published 1962).
   Google Scholar
• Sellars, W. (1997). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind, with an introduction by R. Rorty, and a study guide by R. Brandom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1956).
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, B., & Nissen, M. (2011). Cultural-historical activity theory and action research. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18(2), 93–97. doi:10.1080/10749039.2010.523102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (2017) with a new forward by J. Kabat-Zinn. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience (Revised ed). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Original work published 1991).
   Google Scholar