“Trying to predict the future”: third-generation activity theory’s codesign orientation

References

• Avis, J. (2009). Transformation or transformism: Engeström’s version of activity theory? Educational Review, 61(2), 151–165. doi:10.1080/00131910902844754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhurst, D. (2009). Reflections on activity theory. Educational Review, 61(2), 197–210. doi:10.1080/00131910902846916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannon, L. J., & Bødker, S. (1991). Beyond the interface: Encountering artifacts in use. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.),  Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 227–253). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (Eds.). (1987). Computers and democracy – A Scandinavian challenge. Aldershot, England: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Blunden, A. (2010). An interdisciplinary theory of activity. Boston, MA: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Kammersgaard, J., Kyng, M., & Sundblad, Y. (1987). A UTOPIAN experience: On design of powerful computer-based tools for skilled graphical workers. In G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, & M. Kyng (Eds.), Computers and democracy – A Scandinavian challenge (pp. 251–278). Aldershot, England: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S. (1987). Through the interface: A human activity approach to user interface design. Aarhus Universitet. Retrieved from http://pure.au.dk/portal/files/20861897/Full_text
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S. (1991). Through the interface: A human activity approach to user interface design. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., & Grønbaek, K. (1996). Users and designers in mutual activity: An analysis of cooperative activities in systems design. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 130–158). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S. (2009). Past experiences and recent challenges in participatory design research. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutierrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 274–285). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., & Andersen, P. B. (2005). Complex mediation. Human-Computer Interaction, 20, 353–402. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci2004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., Dindler, C., & Iversen, O. S. (2017). Tying knots: Participatory infrastructuring at work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 26, 1–29. doi:10.1007/s10606-017-9268-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., & Klokmose, C. N. (2011). The human-artifact model: An activity theoretical approach to artifact ecologies. Human–Computer Interaction, 26(4), 315–371. doi:10.1080/07370024.2011.626709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M. (1990). The Nurnberg funnel: Designing minimalist instruction for practical computer skill. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M. (1991). Introduction: The Kittle house manifesto. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, A., & Van Den Besselaar, P. (1993). A retrospective look at PD projects. Communications of the ACM, 36(4), 29–37. doi:10.1145/153571.163264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (1995). Socio-cultural-historical psychology: Some general remarks and a proposal for a new kind of cultural-genetic methodology. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 187–214). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (1999). Cultural psychology: Some general principles and a concrete example. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 87–106). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M., & Scribner, S. (1974). Culture and thought: a psychological introduction. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the age of the computer. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, P. (1989). Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, P., Kyng, M., & Sundblad, Y. (1983). The UTOPIA project. Systems design for with and by the users: Proceedings of the Ifip Wg 9.1 Working Conference, North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1992). Interactive expertise: Studies in distributed working intelligence. Helsinki, FI: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1994). Training for change: New approach to instruction and learning in working life. Geneva, CH: International Labour Office.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1996). Developmental work research as educational research: Looking ten years back and into the zone of proximal development. Nordisk Pedagogik, 16, 131–143.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1999). Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 63–93. doi:10.1023/A:1008648532192
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. doi:10.1080/13639080020028747
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2006). From well-bounded ethnographies to intervening in mycorrhizae activities. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1783–1793. doi:10.1177/0170840606071898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Studies of collaboration and learning at work. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. Gutierrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303–328). New York, NY: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598–628. doi:10.1177/0959354311419252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by expanding. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2016). Studies in expansive learning: Learning what is not yet there. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2018). Expertise in transition: Expansive learning in medical work. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Glăveanu, V. (2012). On third generation activity theory: Interview with Yrjö Engeström. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8(4), 515–518. doi:10.5964/ejop.v8i4.555
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsgren, E., & Byström, K. (2017, July). Multiple social media in the workplace: Contradictions and congruencies. Information Systems Journal, 1–23. doi:10.1111/isj.12156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, V. M., Nardi, B., & Mark, G. (2009). Ensembles: Understanding the instantiation of activities. Information Technology & People, 22(2), 109–131. doi:10.1108/09593840910962195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, J., & Kyng, M. (Eds.). (1991). Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Guile, D. (2010). The learning challenge of the knowledge economy. Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Guile, D. (2012). Inter-professional working and learning: ‘Recontextualising ’ lessons from ‘project work’ for programmes of initial professional formation. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 79–99. doi:10.1080/13639080.2012.644908
   Google Scholar
• Ilyenkov, E. V. (1982). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx’s capital. Moscow, Russia: Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2012). Activity theory in HCI: Fundamentals and reflections. Synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics (Vol. 5). Morgan & Claypool. doi:10.2200/S00413ED1V01Y201203HCI013
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. (2003). The power of intuition: How to use your gut feelings to make better decisions at work. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Caldenwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.). (1993). Decision making in action: Models and methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17–44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & de la Rocha, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning : legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leontiev, A. N. (2005). Study of the environment in the pedological works of LS Vygotsky: a critical study. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 43(4), 8–28. doi: 10610405.2005.11059254
   Google Scholar
• Leontyev, A. N. (2009). The development of mind. Pacifica, CA: Marxists Internet Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D., & Peim, N. (2009). Critical perspectives on activity theory. Educational Review, 61(2), 131–138. doi:10.1080/00131910902844689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1845). Theses on Feuerbach. Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/theses.htm
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. (2011). Vygotsky in perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. A. (Ed.). (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peim, N. (2009). Activity theory and ontology. Educational Review, 61(2), 167–180. doi:10.1080/00131910902846874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ploettner, J., & Tresseras, E. (2016). An interview with Yrjö Engeström and Annalisa Sannino on activity theory. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 9(4), 87–98. doi:10.5565/rev/jtl3.709
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1984). Introduction: Thinking and learning in social context. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 1–8). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking : cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (Eds.). (1984). Everyday cognition : its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sannino, A. (2011). Activity theory as an activist and interventionist theory. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 571–597. doi:10.1177/0959354311417485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Gutierrez, K. D. (Eds.). (2009). Learning and expanding with activity theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scribner, S. (1984). Studying working intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. (2018). Deconflating the ZPD and instructional scaffolding: Retranslating and reconceiving the zone of proximal development as the zone of next development. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 16(September 2017), 70–75. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.10.009
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2002). A Scandinavian challenge, a US response: Methodological assumptions in Scandinavian and US prototyping approaches. In Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Computer documentation (pp. 208–215). ACM Press. doi:10.1145/584955.584986
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2005a). Lost in the translation: Shifting claims in the migration of a research technique. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(4), 411–446. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1404_3
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2005b). The methodology of participatory design. Technical Communication, 52(2), 163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2011). Losing by expanding: Corralling the runaway object. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 25(4), 449–486. doi:10.1177/1050651911411040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone, together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 399–441. doi:10.1177/1050651912444070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2015). All edge: inside the new workplace networks. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226237015.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2017). “I think you should explore the kinky market”: How entrepreneurs develop value propositions as emergent objects of activity networks. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 24, 258–272. doi:10.1080/10749039.2017.1294606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2018). From superhumans to supermediators: Locating the extraordinary in CHAT. In A. Yasnitsky (Ed.), Questioning Vygotsky’s legacy: Scientific psychology or heroic cult (pp. 137–166). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (Eds.). (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary crossing. Boston, MA: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Witte, S. P. (2005). Research in activity: An analysis of speed bumps as mediational means. Written Communication, 22(2), 127–165. doi:10.1177/0741088305274781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsambok, C. E., & Klein, G. (Eds.). (2009). Naturalistic decision making. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar