References

  • Aaen, J., & Dalsgaard, C. (2016). Students’ Facebook groups as a third space: Between social life and schoolwork. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 160–186. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1111241
  • Archer, A. (2005). Access and resistance: Challenges of using on-line environments to teach academic discursive practices. Education as Change, 9(2), 74–95. doi:10.1080/16823200509487117
  • Bailo, F. (2015). Mapping online political talks through network analysis: A case study of the website of Italy’s Five Star Movement. Policy Studies, 36(6), 550–572. doi:10.1080/01442872.2015.1095282
  • Bakhtin, M. (1952). The problem of speech genre. In Speech genres and other late essays. Ed. Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
  • Brailas, A., Koskinas, K., Dafermos, M., & Alexias, G. (2015). Wikipedia in education: Acculturation and learning in virtual communities. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 7, 59–70. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.07.002
  • Bronckart, J.-P. (1999). Atividade de linguagem, textos e discursos [Language activity, texts and discourses] (2a). São Paulo, Brazil: Educ.
  • Cunha Jr., F. R. (2016). Student training for promoting collaborative agency: The monitoring activities. Ponte, 72(7), 170–187. doi:10.21506/j.ponte.2016.7.13
  • Cunha Jr., F. R. (2017). Monitoring activities: A possibility for classroom development. Educação E Pesquisa, 43(3), 681–694. doi:10.1590/S1517-9702201707154754
  • Cunha Jr., F. R., van Kruistum, C., & van Oers, B. (2016). Teachers and Facebook: Using online groups to improve students’ communication and engagement in education. Communication Teacher, 30(4), 228–241. doi:10.1080/17404622.2016.1219039
  • Cunha Jr., F. R., Van Oers, B., & Kontopodis, M. (2016). Collaborating on Facebook: Teachers exchanging experiences through social networking sites. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 12(3), 290–309. doi:10.17759/chp.2016120318
  • Ebrahim, H. (2011). Children as agents in early childhood education. Education as Change, 15(1), 121–131. doi:10.1080/16823206.2011.568947
  • Engeström, Y. (2006). Development, movement and agency: Breaking away into mycorrhizae activities. 1, 1–46. Retrieved from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Mail/xmcam. In K. Yamazumi (Ed.), Building activity theory in practice: Toward the next generation (Vol. 1, pp. 1–43). Osaka: Kansai University Press. Retrieved from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Mail/xmcamail.2008_12.dir/att-0247/Yrjo.dev.pdf
  • Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Exame. (2015, March). Número de smartphones supera o de computadores no Brasil [Number of smartphones surpasses the number of computers in Brasil]. Revista Exame. Retrieved from http://exame.abril.com.br/tecnologia/noticias/numero-de-smartphones-supera-o-de-computadores-no-brasil
  • Facebook. (2015). 45% da população brasileira acessa o Facebook mensalmente [45% of Brazilians access Facebook every month]. Facebook. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/business/news/BR-45-da-populacao-brasileira-acessa-o-Facebook-pelo-menos-uma-vez-ao-mes
  • Freire, P. (1967). Educação como prática da liberdade [Education as liberty practice]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Paz e Terra.
  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Herder and Herder.
  • Freire, P. (2011). Pedagogia da esperança: Um reencontro com a pedagogia do oprimido [Pedagogy of hope: A reencounter with the pedagogy of the opressed] (17th ed.). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Paz e Terra.
  • Giddens, A. (1986). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
  • Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Westport, Connecticut: Bergin & Garvey Publishers Inc. doi:10.2307/2074233
  • Goodband, J. H., Solomon, Y., Samuels, P. C., Lawson, D., & Bhakta, R. (2012). Limits and potentials of social networking in academia: Case study of the evolution of a mathematics Facebook community. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 236–252. doi:10.1080/17439884.2011.587435
  • Goodman, J. F., & Eren, N. S. (2013). Student agency: Success, failure, and lessons learned. Ethics and Education, 8(2), 123–139. doi:10.1080/17449642.2013.843360
  • Haapasaari, A., Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (2016). The emergence of learners’ transformative agency in a Change Laboratory intervention. Journal of Education and Work, 29(2), 232–262. doi:10.1080/13639080.2014.900168
  • Haapasaari, A., & Kerosuo, H. (2015). Transformative agency: The challenges of sustainability in a long chain of double stimulation. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 37–47. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.006
  • Hilppö, J., Lipponen, L., Kumpulainen, K., & Virlander, M. (2015). Sense of agency and everyday life: Children’s perspective. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.10.001
  • Ishtaiwa, F. F., & Aburezeq, I. M. (2015). The impact of Google Docs on student collaboration: A UAE case study. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 7, 85–96. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.07.004
  • Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (2006). Análise da conversação: Princípios e métodos [Conversational analysis: Principles and methods]. São Paulo, Brazil: Parábola.
  • Kontopodis, M., Varvantakis, C., & Wulf, C. (Eds.). (2017). Global youth in digital trajectories. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Laitinen, A., Sannino, A., & Engeström, Y. (2016). From controlled experiments to formative interventions in studies of agency: Methodological considerations. Educação, 39(4), 14. doi:10.15448/1981-2582.2016.s.24321
  • Lemos, M. (2017). Collaborative agency in educational management: A joint object for school and community transformation. RAE; Revista De Administração De Empresas, 57(6), 555–566. doi:10.1590/S0034-759020170604
  • Lemos, M. F. (2014). Concept formation in educational management. Helsinki: Helsinki University Print. Retrieved from https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/42679/monica_lemos_wp_1_2014.pdf?sequence=1. Uusimaa, Finland
  • Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Retrieved from http://www.marxists.org_archive_leontev_works_activity-consciousness
  • Liberali, F. C. (2009). Creative Chain in the process of becoming a totality. Bakhtiniana: Revista De Estudos Do Discurso, 2, 1–25.
  • Lindgren, R., & McDaniel, R. (2012). Transforming online learning through narrative and student agency. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 344–355.
  • Magalhães, M. C. C. (1998). Projetos de formação continua de educadores para uma prática crítica [Teacher education projects towards a critical praxis]. The ESPecialist, 19(2), 169–184.
  • Magalhães, M. C. C. (2011). Theoretical-methodological choices in AL research: Critical research of collaboration in teacher education. Inter Fainc, 1(1), 34–45.
  • Mäkitalo, Å. (2016). On the notion of agency in studies of interaction and learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10, 64–67. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.07.003
  • McLaren, P. (1995). Critical pedagogy and predatory culture. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Miettinen, R. (2010). Creative encounters and the emergence of object-oriented collaborative agency. In European group of organizational studies. Lisbon, Portugal: EGOS.
  • Miettinen, R. (2013). Creative encounters and collaborative agency in science, technology and innovation. In K. Thomas & J. Chan (Eds.), Handbook of research on creativity (pp. 435–449). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Muijs, D. (2016). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. London: Sage.
  • OECD. (2014). OECD factbook - economic, environmental and social statistics. doi:10.187/factbook-2014-en
  • Postma, D. (2015). Critical educational research. Education as Change, 19(1), 1–9. doi:10.1080/16823206.2015.1036628
  • Prescott, J., Wilson, S., & Becket, G. (2013). Facebook use in the learning environment: Do students want this? Learning, Media and Technology, 38(3), 345–350. doi:10.1080/17439884.2013.788027
  • Punch, K., & Oancea, A. (2014). Introduction to research methods in education (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
  • Sannino, A. (2015). The emergence of transformative agency and double stimulation: Activity-based studies in the Vygotskian tradition. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.001
  • Sannino, A., Engeström, Y., & Lemos, M. (2016). Formative interventions for expansive learning and transformative agency. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 599–633. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1204547
  • Siry, C., Wilmes, S. E. D., & Haus, J. M. (2016). Examining children’s agency within participatory structures in primary science investigations. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10, 4–16. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.01.001
  • Sumuer, E., Esfer, S., & Yildirim, S. (2014). Teachers’ Facebook use: Their use habits, intensity, self-disclosure, privacy settings, and activities on Facebook. Educational Studies, 40(5), 537–553. doi:10.1080/03055698.2014.952713
  • van Oers, B. (2012). Meaningful cultural learning by immitative participation: The case of abstract thinking in primary school. Human Development, (55), 136–158. doi:10.1159/000339293
  • van Oers, B. (2013). Educational innovation between freedom and fixation: The cultural-political construction of innovations in early childhood education in the Netherlands. International Journal of Early Years Education, 21(2–3), 178–191. doi:10.1080/09669760.2013.832949
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Child psychology (Vol. 5). New york, NY: Springer.