Design principles as cultural artifacts: Pedagogical improvisation and the bridging of critical theory and teaching practice

References

• Alim, H. S., & Paris, D. (2017). What is culturally sustaining pedagogy and why does it matter. In D. Paris & H. S. Alim (Eds.), Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world (pp. 1–21). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review, 69(3), 99–109. https://hbr.org/1991/05/teaching-smart-people-how-to-learn
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., Faber, L., Gurneau, J., Marin, A., & Soto, C. (2016). Community-based design research: Learning across generations and strategic transformations of institutional relations toward axiological innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2015.1087572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., & Vossoughi, S. (2016). Participatory design research and educational justice: Studying learning and relations within social change making. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1181879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (1998). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (2001, January 19–20). Sustaining model systems of educational activity: Designing for the long haul [Paper]. Symposium Honoring the Work of Ann Brown, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (2006). Culture and cognitive development in phylogenetic, historical, and ontogenetic Perspective. In D. Kuhn, R. S. Siegler, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, and language (pp. 636–683). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cremers, P. H., Wals, A. E., Wesselink, R., & Mulder, M. (2017). Utilization of design principles for hybrid learning configurations by interprofessional design teams. Instructional Science, 45(2), 289–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9398-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahn, M., Enyedy, N., & Danish, J. (2018). How teachers use instructional improvisation to organize science discourse and learning in a mixed reality environment. In J. Kay & R. Luckin (Eds.), Rethinking learning in the digital age: Making the learning sciences count, 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), 1, 72-79 International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.dx.org/10.22318/cscl2018.72
   Google Scholar
• Darder, A. (2018). The student guide to freire’s’ pedagogy of the oppressed’. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, N. R., Vossoughi, S., & Smith, J. F. (2020). Learning from below: A micro-ethnographic account of children’s self-determination as sociopolitical and intellectual action. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 24, 100373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterday, M. W., Lewis, D. G. R., & Gerber, E. M. (2016). The logic of the theoretical and practical products of design research. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1985). Qualitative methods in research on teaching: Occasional paper no. 81. Institute for Research on Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (2007). Some thoughts on “proximal” formative assessment of student learning. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 106(1), 186–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7984.2007.00102.x
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970/2017). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M.B. Ramos, Trans). Penguin Random House. (Original work published in 1970).
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987/2005). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Routledge. (Original work published in 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Ghousseini, H. (2017). Rehearsals of teaching and opportunities to learn mathematical knowledge for teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 35(3), 188–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1323903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1984). Current activity for the future: The zo‐ped. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, (1984(23), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219842306
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., & Johnson, P. (2017). Understanding identity sampling and cultural repertoires: Advancing a historicizing and syncretic system of teaching and learning in justice pedagogies. In D. Paris & H. S. Alim (Eds.), Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world (pp. 247–260). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., & Jurow, A. S. (2016). Social design experiments: Toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 565–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1204548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jornet, A., & Roth, W. M. (2015). The joint work of connecting multiple (re) presentations in science classrooms. Science Education, 99(2), 378–403. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. E., & Diamond, J. B. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. (1993, December 7). Toni Morrison—Nobel lecture [Nobel Lecture]. Nobel Media. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/1993/morrison/lecture/
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. I. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 489–504). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Cadiz, M. D. P., Wong, P. L., & Torres, C. A. (1998). Education and democracy: Paulo Freire, curriculum reform, and social movements. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (2007). Global englishes and transcultural flows. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petchauer, E. (2009). Framing and reviewing hip-hop educational research. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 946–978. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308330967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip, T. M. (2019). Principled improvisation to support novice teacher learning. Teachers College Record, 121(6), 1–32. ID Number: 22739. https://www.tcrecord.org
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip, T. M., & Gupta, A. (2020). Emerging perspectives on the co-construction of power and learning in the learning sciences, mathematics education, and science education. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903309
   Google Scholar
• Pittard, E. (2015). Who does critical pedagogy think you are? Investigating how teachers are produced in critical pedagogy scholarship to inform teacher education. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 10(4), 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2015.1066679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B., Matusov, E., & White, C. (1996). Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching, and schooling (pp. 373–398). Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.778204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino, A., Engeström, Y., & Lemos, M. (2016). Formative interventions for expansive learning and transformative agency. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 599–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1204547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. (2015). A call to action: The challenges of creative teaching and learning. Teachers College Record, 117(10), 1–34. ID Number: 1808. https://www.tcrecord.org
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe, G. B., & Esmonde, I. (2005). Studying cognition in flux: A historical treatment of Fu in the shifting structure of Oksapmin mathematics. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(3–4), 171–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca123&4_2
   Google Scholar
• Sleeter, C. E., & Bernal, D. D. (2004). Critical pedagogy, critical race theory, and antiracist education: Implications for multicultural education. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 240–258). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Van Es, E. A., Cashen, M., Barnhart, T., & Auger, A. (2017). Learning to notice mathematics instruction: Using video to develop preservice teachers’ vision of ambitious pedagogy. Cognition and Instruction, 35(3), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1317125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., Davis, N., Jackson, A., Echevarria, R., Muñoz, A., & Escudé, M. (2021). Beyond the binary of adult versus child-centered learning: A close analysis of third-way pedagogies in the context of making. Cognition and Instruction, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1860052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (2017). Critical pedagogy and sociocultural theory. In I. Esmonde & A. N. Booker (Eds.), Power and Privilege in the Learning Sciences: Critical and Sociocultural Theories of Learning (pp. 157–179). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., Jackson, A., Chen, S., Roldan, W., & Escudé, M. (2020). Embodied pathways and ethical trails: Studying learning in and through relational histories. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(2), 183–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1693380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, B., Vossoughi, S., Rosebery, A., Bang, M., & Taylor, E. (2020). Multiple ways of knowing: Re-imagining disciplinary learning. In N. I. S. Nasir, C. D. Lee, R. Pea, & M. M. Royston (Eds.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning(pp. 277-294). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winn, M. T., & Johnson, L. P. (2011). Mis-education to re-education: Our journey writing instruction in the culturally relevant classroom. In L. McAvoy (Ed.), Writing instruction in the culturally relevant classroom (pp. 1–9). National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Zavala, M. (2016). Design, participation, and social change: What design in grassroots spaces can teach learning scientists. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1169818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar