Pragmatic communication disorders following stroke

References

• Ball, M.J., Davies, E., Duckworth, M., & Middlehurst, R. (1991). Assessing the assessments: A comparison of two clinical pragmatic profiles. Journal of Communication Disorders, 24, 367–379.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E. (1976). Language in context. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blonder, L., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. (1991). The role of the right hemisphere in emotional communication. Brain, 114, 1,115–1,127.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, L., & Lahey, M. (1978). Language development and language disorders. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, R.L., Borod, J.C., Obler, L.K., & Gerstman, L.J. (1993). Suppression and facilitation of pragmatic performance: Effects of emotional content on discourse following right and left brain damage. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 1,227–1,235.
   Google Scholar
• Brenneise-Sarshad, R., Nicholas, L.E., & Brookshire, R.H. (1991). Effects of apparent listener knowledge and picture stimuli on aphasic and non-brain-damaged speakers ’ narrative discourse. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 169–176.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, R., & Duffy, R.J. (1980). Nonverbal communication of affect in brain-damaged patients. Cortex, 16, 351–362.
   Google Scholar
• Bums, M.S., Halper, A.S., & Mogil, S.I. (1985). R1C evaluation of communication problems in right hemisphere dysfunction (RICE). Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, C.R., Brookshire, R.H., & Nicholas, L.E. (1988). Referential communication by aphasic and nonaphasic adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53,475–482.
   Google Scholar
• Cicone, M., Wapner, W., Foldi, N., Zurif, E., & Gardner, H. (1979). The relation between gesture and language in aphasic communication. Brain and Language, 8,324–349.
   Google Scholar
• Cicone, M., Wapner, W., & Gardner, H. (1980). Sensitivity to emotional expressions and situations in organic patients. Cortex, 16, 145–158.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G.A. (1986). Pragmatics and treatment. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G.A. (1993). A survey of adult aphasia and related language disorders (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G.A., & Wilcox, M.J. (19^5). Adult aphasia rehabilitation: Applied pragmatics. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emest-Baron, C, Brookshire, R.H., & Nicholas, L.E. (1987). Story structure and retelling of narratives by aphasic and non-brain-damaged adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Foldi, N.S. (1987). Appreciation of pragmatic interpretations of indirect commands: Comparison of right and left hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 31, 88–108.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., Ling, P.K., Flamm, L., & Silverman, J. (1975). Comprehension and appreciation of humorous material following brain damage. Brain, 98, 399–412.
   Google Scholar
• Goldblum, G. (1985). Aphasia: A societal and clinical appraisal of pragmatic and linguistic behaviors. The South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 32, 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, T., & Mackisack, E.L. (1992, November). Current practice in pragmatics assessment: National survey results. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1963). Disturbance of gesture and pantomime in aphasia. Brain, 86, 703–720.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A.L. (1977). Some practical considerations in aphasia rehabilitation. In M. Sullivan & M.S. Kommers (Eds.), Rationale for adult aphasia therapy. Omaha, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A. (1980). Communication abilities in daily living: A test of functional communication for aphasic adults. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A. (1981). Aphasics as communicators: A model and its implications. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A.L. (1982). Observing functional communication of aphasic adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 50–56.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A.L. (1991). Pragmatic aspects of intervention in aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 6, 197–211.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, M. (1990). Narrative comprehension in adults with right and left hemisphere brain damage: Theme organization. Brain and Language, 38, 253–277.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, M.S., & Pierce, R.S. (1994). Pragmatics and treat-ment. InR. Chapey (Ed.),Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, W., & Gleber, J. (1982). Linguistic and nonlinguistic processing of narratives in aphasia. Brain and Language, 16, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., Ska, B., & Nespoulous, J. (1989). Informative content of narrative discourse in right brain-damaged right-handers. Brain and Language, 29, 81–105.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R.C., LaPointe, L.L., & Markel, N.N. (1978). Coverbal behavior and aphasie speakers. In R. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, K. (1994). Group therapy for aphasia: Theoretical and practical considerations. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Linebaugh, C, Kryzer, K., Oden, S., & Myers, P.S. (1982). Reapportionment of communicative burden in aphasia: A study of narrative instructions. In R. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, J., Pickard, L., Bester, S., Elbard, H., Finlayson, A., & Zoghaib, C. (1989). The communicative effectiveness in-dex: Development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 113–124.
   Google Scholar
• Lubinski, R. (1994). Environmental systems approach to adult aphasia. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, J.G. (1992). Communication use and participation in life for adults with aphasia in natural settings: The scope of the problem. American Journal of Speech-Language-Pathology, 1(3), 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Mackisack, E.L., Myers, P.S., & Duffy, J.R. (1987). Verbosity and labeling behavior: The performance of right hemisphere and non-brain-damaged adults on an inferential picture description task. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McTear, M.F. (1985). Pragmatic disorders: A question of direction. Journal of Disorders of Communication, 20, 119–127.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, P.S. (1994). Communication disorders associated with right-hemisphere brain damage. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, P., & Linebaugh, C. (1981). Comprehension of idiomatic expressions by right-hemisphere-damaged adults. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, P.S., Linebaugh, C.W., & Mackisack-Morin, E.L. (1985). Extracting implicit meaning: Right versus left hemisphere damage. In R.H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, P.S., & Mackisack, E.L. (1990). Right hemisphere syndrome. In L.L. LaPointe (Ed.), Aphasia and related neurogenic language disorders. New York, NY: Thieme Medical.
   Google Scholar
• Newhoff, M., & Apel, K. (1990). Impairments in pragmatics. In L. LaPointe (Ed.), Aphasia and related neurogenic language disorders. New York, NY: Thieme Medical.
   Google Scholar
• Pashek, G., & Brookshire, R. (1982). Effects of rate of speech and linguistic stress on auditory paragraph comprehension of aphasic individuals. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25, 377–383.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, C. (1988). The profiling of syntax and pragmatics in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 2, 179–208.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, H.A., & Marquardt, T.P. (1990). Appraisal and diagnosis of speech and language disorders. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Prutting, C. (1982). Observational protocol for pragmatic behaviors. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Prutting, C.A., & Kirchner, D.M. (1987). A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects oflangua gt Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, P.R. (1994). Use of Amer-Ind code by persons with aphasia. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, E.D., & Mesulum, M.M. (1979). Dominant language functions of the right hemisphere? Prosody and emotional gesturing. Archives of Neurology, 36, 561–569.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, P.P., & Spekman, N.J. (1984). Assessing the pragmatic abilities of children: Part I. Organizational framework and assessment parameters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Samo, M.T. (1965). A measurement of functional communication in aphasia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 46, 101–107.
   Google Scholar
• Scheinberg, S., & Holland, A. (1980). Conversational turn-taking in Wernicke’s aphasia. In R.H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C.A. (1990). Knowledge and strategies for processing lexical metaphor after right or left hemisphere brain damage. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 307–316.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C.A. (1991). Redundancy enhances emotional inferencing by right- and left-hemisphere-damaged adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 1,1421,149.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C.A., Boada, R., & McGarry, K. (1992). The access and processing of familiar idioms by brain-damaged and normally aging adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 626–637.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C.A., & Flowers, C.R. (1985). Perception of emotional intonation by brain-damaged adults: The influence of task processing levels. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 527–538.
   Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H., North, A., & Macaluso-Haynes, S. (1981). Production of narrative and procedural discourse in aphasia. Brain and Language, 13, 345–371.
   Google Scholar
• Wapner, W., Hamby, S., & Gardner, H. (1981). The role of the right hemisphere in the appreciation of complex linguistic materials. Brain and Language, 14, 15–33.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, M.J., & Davis, A.G. (1977). Speech act analysis of aphasic communication in individual and group settings. In R.H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, N.J., Davis, G.A., & Leonard, L.L. (1978). Aphasic’s comprehension of contextually conveyed meaning. Brain and Language, 6, 362–377.
   Google Scholar
• Wulfeck, B., Bates, E., Juarez, L., Opie, M., Friederici, A., MacWhinney, B., & Zurif, E. (1989). Pragmatics in aphasia: Crosslinguistic evidence. Language and Speech, 32(4), 315–336.
   Google Scholar