Outcome Measures in Quality of Life

References

• Ahlsió, B., Britton, M., Murray, V., – Theorell, T. (1984). Disablement and quality of life after stroke. Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 15, 886–890.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, F.M., – Withey, S.B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: America's perception of quality of life. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (1993). Executive summary. In Quality of life assessment. Practice, problems, and promise: Proceedings from a workshop. Washington, DC: National institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A.T., Ward, C.H., – Mendelson, M. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.
   Google Scholar
• Bergner, ML, Bobbitt, R.A., Carter, W.B., – Gilson, B.S. (1981). The sickness impact profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care, 19, 787–805.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, D. (1995). Allocating health care resources: The vexing case of rehabilitation. A merican Journal ofPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74( 1), 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cifu, D.S., – Lorish, T.R. (1994). Stroke rehabilitation: Stroke outcome. Archives ofPhysical Medicine and Reha-bilitation, 75, 556–560.
   Google Scholar
• Côté, R., Hachinski, V.C., Shurvell, B.L., Norris, J.W., – Wolfson, C. (1986). The Canadian Neurological Scale: A preliminary study in acute stroke. Stroke, 17, 731–737.
   Google Scholar
• Croog, S.H. (1990). Current issues in conceptualizing and measuring quality of life. In Quality of life assessment: Practice, problems, and promise. Proceedings of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, R., Aaronson, N., Limburg, M., Langton-Hewer, R., – van Crevel, H. ( 1993). Measuring quality oflife in stroke. Stroke, 24, 320–327.
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, R., Horn, J., Limburg, M., Van der Meulen, J., – Bossuyt, P. ( 1993). A comparison of five stroke scales with measures of disability, handicap, and quality oflife. Stroke, 24, 1,178–1,181.
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, R., Limburg, M., Van der Meulen, J., Jacobs, M.M., – Aaronson, N.K. (1995). Quality oflife after stroke. Impact of stroke type and lesion location. Stroke, 26, 402–408.
   Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larson, R., – Griffin, S. ( 1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkers, M. (in press). Measuring quality of life. In M.J. Führer (Ed.), Medical rehabilitation outcomes research. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, K., Sanson-Fisher, R.W., – Redman, S. (1989). Measuring quality of life in cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 7, 958–968.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, S., Barer, D., – Nouri, F. (1986). Use of the Nottingham health profile with patients after a stroke. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 40, 166–169.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R.L., Hendricks, R.D., Connis, R.T., Haselkom, J.K., Ries, K.R., – Mennet, T.E. (1994). Quality of life after spinal cord injury: A literature critique and meta-analysis (1983-1992). Journal of the American Paraplegia Society, 17(2), 60–66.
   Google Scholar
• Faden, R. (1993). Ethical issues related to quality of life assessment. In C.D. Furberg – J.A. Schuttinga (Eds.), Quality of life assessment. Practice, problems, and promise. Bethesda, MD: National institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, J. (1982). Measurement of quality of life: Current state of the art. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 63, 56–59.
   Google Scholar
• Führer, M.J. (1996). The subjective well-being of people with spinal cord injury: Relationships to impairment, disability and handicap. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 7(4), in press.
   Google Scholar
• Führer, M.J., Rintala, D., Hart, K., Clearman, R., – Young, M.E. (1992). Relationship of life satisfaction to impairment, disability, and handicap among persons with spinal cord injury living in the community. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73, 552–557.
   Google Scholar
• Ganiats, T.G., Palinkas, L.A., – Kaplan, R.M. (1992). Com-parison of quality of well-being scale and functional status index in patients with atrial fibrillation. Medical Care, 30( 10), 958–964.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, T.M., – Feinstein, A.R. (1994). A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. JAMA, 272, 619626.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D.P., – Hillier, V.F. (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9, 139–145.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, L.B., Bertels, C., – Davis, J.N. (1989). interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale. Archives of Neurology, 46, 660–662.
   Google Scholar
• Grieco, A., – Long, C.M. (1984). Investigation of the Kamofsky performance status as a measure of quality of life. Health Psychology, 3(2), 129–142.
   Google Scholar
• Guyatt, G.H., – Jaeschke, R. (1990). Measurement in clinical trials: Choosing the appropriate approach. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life assessment in clinical trials. New York, NY: Raven Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M., – Skilbeck, C. (1983). An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and Aging, 12, 166–170.
   Google Scholar
• Horley, J. (1984). Life satisfaction, happiness and morale: Two problems with the use of subjective well-being indicators. Gerontologist, 24, 124–127.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyt, D.R., – Creech, M.C. (1983). The life satisfaction index: A methodological and theoretical critique. Journal of Gerontology, 38(1), 111–116.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S., McEwan, J., – McKenna, S. (1985). Measuring health status: A new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 35, 185–188.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, R., – Kane, R. (1982). Values and long-term care: Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R.M., – Anderson, J.P. (1990). The general health policy model: An integrated approach. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life assessment in clinical trials. New York, NY: Raven Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kind, P., Rosser, R., – Williams, A. (1982). Valuation of quality of life: some psychometric evidence. In M.W. Jones-Lie (Ed.), The value of life and strategy. New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kinney, W., – Coyle, C. (1992). Predicting life satisfaction among adults with physical disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73, 863–869.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, L., – Christie, D. (1979). Quality of life after stroke: A three-year follow-up. Age and Aging, 8,167–172.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, M.N., Gafani, A., Markham, B., – MacFarlane, D. (1992). A bedside decision instrument to elicit a patient's preference concerning adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Annals of Internal Medicine, 117, 53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, S., – Croog, S.H. (1984). What constitutes quality of life? A conceptualization of the dimensions of life quality in healthy populations and patients with cardiovascular disease. In N.K. Wenger, M.E. Mattson, C.D Furberg, – J. Elinson, (Eds.), Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. New York, NY: Le Jacq.
   Google Scholar
• Mathew, N.T., Meyer, J.S., Rivera, V.M., Chamey, J.Z., – Hartmann, A. (1972). Double-blind evaluation of glycerol therapy in acute cerebral infarction. Lancet, 2, 1,327–1,329.
   Google Scholar
• McHomey, C. A., Ware, J.E., – Raczek, A.E. (1993). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health consultants. Medical Care, 31, 247–263.
   Google Scholar
• McKeon, R. (1947). Introduction to Aristotle. New Y ork, NY: Modem Library.
   Google Scholar
• McNair, D.M., Lorr, M., – Droppleman, L.F. (1971). E1TS manual for the profile of mood states. San Diego, CA: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Mulley, A.C. (1993). The role of quality of life assessments in decision making. In Quality of life assessment. Practice, problems, and promise. Proceedings from a workshop. Washington DC: National Institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health. (1990). Quality of life assessment: Practice, problems, and promise: Proceedings of a workshop. Bethesda, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E., Wasson, J., Kirk, J., Keller, A., Clark, D., Dietrich, A., Stewart, A., – Zubkoff, M. (1987). Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: Description of the COOP chart method. Journal of Chronic Disease, 40(S1), 55S–63S.
   Google Scholar
• Neugarten, B., Havighurst, R., – Tobin, S. (1961). The measurement of life satisfaction. Journal of Gerontology, 16, 134–143.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, M., Laaksonen, R., Kotila, M., – Waltimo, O. (1988). Quality of life four years after stroke. Stroke, 19, 1,1011,107.
   Google Scholar
• Orgogozo, J.M. (1989). Evaluation of treatments in ischaemic-stroke patients. In W.K. Amery (Ed.), Clinical trial methodology in stroke. London, England: Balliere Tindall.
   Google Scholar
• Osberg, J.S., DeJong, G., Haley, S.M., Seward, M.L., McGinnis, G.E., – Germaine, J. (1988). Predicting longterm outcome among post-rehabilitation stroke patients. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 67(3), 94–103.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, D.L. (1993). Reactions and recommendations: Quality of life in NIH-sponsored studies. In Quality of life assessment: Practice, problems, and promise: Proceedings from a workshop. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Pliskin, J., Shepard, D., – Weinstein, M. (1980). Utility functions of life years and health status. Operations Research, 28, 206–224.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scandinavian Stroke Study Group. (1985). Multicenter trial ofhemodilution in ischemic stroke: Background and study protocol. Stroke, 16, 885–890.
   Google Scholar
• Schag, C.C., Heinrich, R.L., – Ganz, R.A. (1984). Kamofsky performance status revisited. Reliability, validity, and guidelines. Clinical Oncology, 2, 187–193.
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, L. (1980). Experiences with quality oflife comparisons: Comparative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, M.E., – Schall, R.R. (1994). Determining functional/ health status and its relation to disability in stroke survivors. Stroke, 25(12), 2,391–2,397.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D.C., – Johnson, D.M. (1978). Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5, 475–492.
   Google Scholar
• Shumaker, S., Anderson, R.T., – Czajkowski, S.M. (1990). Psychological tests and scales. In B. Spiker (Ed.), Quality oflife assessment in clinical trials. New York, NY: Raven.
   Google Scholar
• Snaith, R.P., Ahmed, S.M., Mehta, S., – Hamilton, M. (1971). Assessment of the severity of primary depressive illness. Wakefield Self-Assessment Depression Inventory. Psychological Medicine, 1, 143–149.
   Google Scholar
• Spilker, B. (Ed.). (1990). Quality oflife assessment in clinical trials. New York, NY: Raven Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzer, W.O., Dobson, A.J., Hall, J., Chesterman, E., Levi, J., Sheppard, M., Battista, R.N., – Catchlove, B.R. (1981). Measuring quality oflife of cancer patients: A concise QL-index for use by physicians. Journal of Chronic Disease, 34, 585–597.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart-Amidei, C., – Penckofer, S. (1988). Quality of life following cerebral bypass surgery. Journal of Neuro-science Nursing, 20(1), 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Sugarbaker, P.H., Barofsky, I., Rosenberg, S.A., – Gianola, F.J. (1982). Quality oflife assessment of patients in extremity sarcoma clinical trials. Surgery, SI, 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Task Force on Stroke Impairment, Task Force on Stroke Disability, – Task Force on Stroke Handicap (1990). Symposium recommendations for methodology in stroke outcome research. Stroke, 2i(Suppl. II),1,168–1,173.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, D.G., Stiers, W., Daugherty, J., Forchheimer, M., Cohen, E., – Hansen, N. (1994). The effects of insurance benefits coverage on functional and psychosocial outcomes after spinal cord injury. Archives ofPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 407–414.
   Google Scholar
• Thomgren, M., – Wrestling, B. (1990). Rehabilitation and achieved health quality after stroke. A population-based study of 258 hospitalized cases followed for one year. Acta Neurologic a Scandinavica, 82(6), 374–380.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, G. (1987). Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. Journal of Chronic Disease, 40(6), 593–600.
   Google Scholar
• Towle, D., Lincoln, N.B., – Mayfield, L.M. (1989). Evaluation of social work on depression after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 3, 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Trieschmann, R.B. (1995). The energy model: A new approach to rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Education, 9(2), 217–227.
   Google Scholar
• Tsevat, J., Weeks, J.C., Guadagnoli, E., Tosteson, A.N.A, Mangione, C.M., Pliskin, J.S., Weinstein, M.C., – Cleary, P.D. (1994). Using health-related quality of life information: Clinical encounters, clinical trials, and health policy. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 9, 576–582.
   Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, F.C.E., – de Haes, J.C.J.M. (1988). Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: Psychometric properties of instruments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 41, 1,042–1,053.
   Google Scholar
• Viitanen, M., Fugl-Meyer, K.S., Bern spang, B., – Fugl-Meyer, A.R. (1988). Life satisfaction in long-term survivors after stroke. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 20, 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, J.E., – Sherboume, CD., (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I: Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.
   Google Scholar
• Weisgerber, R.A. (1991). Quality of life for persons with disabilities: Skill development and transitions across life stages. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, N.K., Mattson, M.E., Furberg, C.D., – Elinson, J. (Eds). (1984). Assessment of quality oflife in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. New York, NY: Le Jacq.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteneck, G.C. (1994). Measuring what matters: Key reha-bilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 1,073–1,076.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. (1985). Quality adjusted life years and coronary artery bypass grafting. Department of Health and Social Services Publications on Quality Adjusted Life Years, issues 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, I.B., – Cleary, P.D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. JAMA, 273, 59–65.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfensberger, W. (1994). Let's hang up "quality of life" as a hopeless term. In D. Goode (Ed.), Quality of life for persons with a disability: International perspectives and issues. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan, L. (1992). Quality oflife conceptual and measurement issues. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 795–800.
   Google Scholar