Communication and quality of life outcomes from an interprofessional intensive, comprehensive, aphasia program (ICAP)

References

• Dignam JK, Rodriguez AD, Copland DA. Evidence for intensive aphasia therapy: consideration of theories fro neuroscience and cognitive psychology. Phys Med Rehab. 2015;8:254–67. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M. Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke. 2003;34:987–93.10.1161/01.STR.0000062343.64383.D0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey RR. A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. J Speech, Lang Hear Res. 1998;41:172–87.10.1044/jslhr.4101.172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Patterson JP, Raymer A, Frymark T, Schooling T. Evidence-based systematic review: effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. J Speech, Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:1282–99.10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0206)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR. Oral reading for language in aphasia (ORLA): impact of aphasia severity on cross-modal outcomes in chronic nonfluent aphasia. Semin Speech-Lang Pathol. 2010;31:42–51.10.1055/s-0029-1244952
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramsberger G, Marie B. Self-administered cued naming therapy: a single-participant investigation of a computer-based therapy program replicated in four cases. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2007;16:343–58.10.1044/1058-0360(2007/038)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose ML, Cherney LR, Worrall LE. Intensive comprehensive aphasia programs: an international survey of practice. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2013;20(5):379–87.10.1310/tsr2005-379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermuller F, Neininger B, Elbert T, Mohr B, Rockstroh B, Koebbel P, et al. Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1621–6.10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persad C, Wozniak L, Kostopoulos E. Retrospective analysis of outcomes from two intensive comprehensive aphasia programs. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2013;20(5):388–97.10.1310/tsr2005-388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz A. The Western aphasia battery, revised. San Antonio (TX): PsychCorp; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Holland AL, Frattali CM, Fromm DS. Communication activities of daily living-2. Austin (TX): Pro-Ed; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas J, Pickard L, Bester S, Elbard H, Finlayson A, Zoghaib C. The communicative effectiveness index: development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia. J Speech Hear Disord. 1989;54:113–24.10.1044/jshd.5401.113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Rating the strength of scientific research findings. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2002. AHRQ Publication No. 02-P022. Available from: www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/strenfact.htm
   Google Scholar
• Winans-Mitrik R, Schumacher J, Hula W, Dickey M, Doyle P. Description of an intensive residential aphasia treatment program: rationale, clinical processes, and outcomes. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2014;23:S330–42.10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinburn K, Porter G, Howard D. Comprehensive aphasia test. New York: Psychology Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil MR, Doyle PJ, Fossett TRD, Park GH. Reliability and concurrent validity of the information unit scoring metric for the story retelling procedure. Aphasiology. 2001;15:991–1006.10.1080/02687040143000348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle P, Hula W, Hula S, Ross K, Wambaugh J, Schumacher J, et al. The aphasia communication outcome measure: item reduction, scaling, and concurrent validity of self-reported communicative functioning in aphasia. In: Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Lake Tahoe (CA); 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez A, Worrall L, McKinnon E, Groh B, Brown K, Van Hees S, et al. Therapaeutic effect of an intensive comprehensive aphasia program: aphasia LIFT. Seminar presentation Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Tucson (AZ), May; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Fama ME, Turkeltaub PE. Treatment of poststroke aphasia: current practice and new directions. Semin Neurol. 2014;5:504–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay MP, Gubitz G, Bayley M, Philips S. Summary of stroke best practice recommendations. Ottawa: Candadian Stroke Best Practices and Standards Working Group; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, Choi JY, Glasberg JJ, Graham GD, et al. Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke. 2005;36:e100–e143.10.1161/01.STR.0000180861.54180.FF
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hula W, Cherney LR, Worrall LE. Setting a research agenda to inform intensive comprehensive aphasia programs. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2013;20(5):409–20.10.1310/tsr2005-409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. J Speech-Lang Hear Res. 1993;36:338–50.10.1044/jshr.3602.338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0: evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30:2131–40.10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frattali DM, Thompson CK, Holland AL, Wohl CB, Ferketic MM. The American speech-language-hearing association functional assessment of communication skills for adults. Rockville (MD): American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Simmons-Mackie N. Beginning with the end outcome-driven assessment and intervention with life participation in mind. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2007;27(4):309–17.
   Google Scholar
• Porch BE. Porch index of communicative ability. Palo Alto: Psychologists Press; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Davis GA. PACE revisited. Aphasiology. 2005;19:21–38.
   Google Scholar
• LPAA Project Group, Chapey R, Duchan J, Elman R, Garcia L, Kagan A, et al. Life participation approach to aphasia: a statement of values for the future. In: Chapey R, editor. Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. 5th ed. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 279–89.
   Google Scholar
• Elman R, Hoover E. Integrating communication support into aphasia group treatment. In: Simmons-Mackie N, King J, Beukelman D, editors. Supporting communication for adults with acute and chronic aphasia. Baltimore (MD): Brookes; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover EL, Kaplan JH. Starting an aphasia center in an academic setting: a review of the first years. Seminar presentation at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association, New Orleans (LA); 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Elman R, Bernstein-Ellis E. Aphasia book clubs: making the connection. Stroke Connect. 2006 May/Jun. 32–3.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover E, Carney A. Integrating the iPad into an intensive, comprehensive aphasia program. Semin Speech Lang. 2014;35(1):25–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan D, Bub D. Psycholinguistic assessment of aphasia. Mini-seminar presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Seattle (WA); 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Roach A, Schwartz MF, Martin N, Grewal RS, Brecher A. The Philadelphia naming test: scoring and rationale. Clin Aphasiol. 1996;24:121–33.
   Google Scholar
• Cho-Reyes S, Thompson CK. Verb and sentence production and comprehension in aphasia: Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS). Aphasiology. 2012;26:1250–77. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.693584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O. 2006. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 499–526 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Brookshire RH, Nicholas LE. The discourse comprehension test. Tucson (AZ): Communication Skill Builders/The Psychological Corporation; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Babbitt EM, Worrall L, Cherney LR. Structure, processes, and retrospective outcomes from an intensive comprehensive aphasia program. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2015;24:S854–63.10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman D, Garrett K, Yorkston K. Augmentative communication strategies for adults with acute and chronic medical conditions. Baltimore (MD): Brookes Publishing; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle M. Semantic features analysis treatment for anomia in two fluent aphasia syndromes. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2004;13:236–49.10.1044/1058-0360(2004/025)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Patterson JP, Raymer A, Frymark T, Schooling T. Updated evidence-based systematic review: effects of intensity of treatment and constrain-induced language therapy of individuals with stroke induced aphasia. Rockville (MD): ASHA’s Natiional Center of Evidence Based Practice in Communication Disorders; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds LA, Nadeau S, Kiran S. Effect of verb network strengthening treatment (VNeST) on lexical retrieval of content words in sentences in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2009;23(3):402–24.10.1080/02687030802291339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pictello. 2013. AssistiveWare B.V. (Version 1.7) [Mobile application software]. Available from http://itunes.apple.com
   Google Scholar
• Proloquo2Go. 2013. AssistiveWare B.V. (Version 3.0.2) [Mobile application software]. Available from: http://itunes.apple.com
   Google Scholar