Validation of international stroke scales for use by nurses in Greek settings

References

• Mason-Whitehead E, Ridgway V, Barton J. Passed without a stroke: a UK mixed method study exploring student nurses’ knowledge of stroke. Nurse Educ. Today. 2013;33(9):998–1002.10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price C, Curless R, Rodgers H. Can stroke patients use visual analogue scales? Stroke. 1999;30:1357–1361.10.1161/01.STR.30.7.1357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191.10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyden P, Brott T, Tilley B, Welch K, Mascha E, Levine S, et al. Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale using video training. NINDS TPA Stroke Study Group. Stroke. 1994;25:2220–2226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanlgren N. Results in 94 hemorrhagic stroke patients randomized to the clomethizole acute stroke study (CLASS), a double blind placebo controlled trial in acute hemispheric stroke patients. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 1998;7(5):370–370.10.1016/S1052-3057(98)80069-4
   Google Scholar
• Albers G, Clark W, Madden K, Hamilton S. ATLANTIS trial: results for patients treated within 3 hours of stroke onset. Alteplase Thrombolysis for Acute Noninterventional Therapy in Ischaemic Stroke. Stroke. 2002;33(2):493–496.10.1161/hs0202.102599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams H, Effron M, Torner J, Davalos A, Frayne J, Teal P. emergency administration of abciximab for treatment of patients with acute ischaemic stroke: results of an international phase III trial: abciximab in emergency treatment of stroke trial (AbESTT-II). Stroke. 2008;39(1):87–99.10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.476648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercock P, Lindley R, Wardlaw J, Dennis M, Lewis S, Venables G, et al. The third international stroke trial (IST-3) of thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Trials. 2008;9(1):3–42.10.1186/1745-6215-9-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenstrom E, Boysen G, Christiansen L, Waage L, Hansen B, Nielsen P. Reliability of Scandinavian Neurological Stroke scale. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 1991;1:103–107.10.1159/000108825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellul J, Watkins C, Barer D. Estimating total Barthel scores from just three items: the European Stroke Database “minimum dataset” for assessing functional status at discharge from hospital. Age Ageing. 1998;27:115–122.10.1093/ageing/27.2.115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aberg E, Adielsson G, Almqvist A, Andersson L, Asplund K, Aursnes I. et al. Scandinavian Stroke Study Group Multicentre trial of haemodilution in ischaemic stroke–background and study protocol. Stroke. 1985;16(5):885–890.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barber M, Fail M, Shields M, Stott D, Langhorne P. Validity and reliability of estimating the Scandinavian Stroke Scale score from medical records. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2004;17:224–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luvizutto G, Monteiro T, Braga G, Pontes-Neto O, de Lima Resende L, Bazan R. Validation of the Scandinavian Stroke Scale in a Multicultural Population in Brazil. Cerebrovasc. Dis. Extra. 2012;2(1):121–126.10.1159/000345948
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christensen H, Boysen G, Truelsen T. The Scandinavian Stroke Scale predicts outcome in patients with mild ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2005;20:46–48.10.1159/000086280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomassen L, Waje-Andreassen U, Broegger J, Naess H. Acute stroke centre – the changing focus of stroke unit care. The Bergen NORSTROKE Study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2012;125:410–415.10.1111/ane.2012.125.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davalos A, Toni D, Iweins F, Lesaffre E, Bastianello S, Castillo J. Neurological deterioration in acute ischaemic stroke: Potential predictors and associated factors in the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) I. Stroke. 1999;30:2631–2636.10.1161/01.STR.30.12.2631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haan R, Horn J, Limburg M, Van Der Meulen J, Bossuyt P. A comparison of five stroke scales with measures of disability, handicap, and quality of life. Stroke. 1993a;24:1178–1181.10.1161/01.STR.24.8.1178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandset E, Bath P, Boysen G, Jatuzis D, Korv J, Luders S, et al. The angiotensin-receptor blocker candesartan for treatment of acute stroke (SCAST): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9767):741–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md Med. J. 1965;14:61–65.
   Google Scholar
• van Hartingsveld F, Lucas C, Kwakkel G, Lindeboom R. Improved interpretation of stroke trial results using empirical Barthel item weights. Stroke. 2006;37:162–166.10.1161/01.STR.0000195176.50830.b6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin C, Wade D, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int. Disabi. Stud. 1988;10(2):61–63.10.3109/09638288809164103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epifanov Y, Dodel R, Haacke C, Schaeg M, Schöffski O, Hennerici M, et al. Costs of acute stroke care on regular neurological wards: a comparison with stroke unit setting. Health Policy. 2007;81:339–349.10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haacke C, Althaus A, Spottke A. Long-term outcome after stroke: evaluating health-related quality of life using utility measurements. Stroke. 2006;37:193–198.10.1161/01.STR.0000196990.69412.fb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Cooper B, Maas F. The Barthel Index and ADL evaluation in stroke rehabilitation in Australia, Japan, the UK and the USA. Aust. Occup. Ther. J. 1992;39(1):5–13.10.1111/aot.1992.39.issue-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wade D, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability?. Int. Disabi. Stud. 1988;10:64–67.10.3109/09638288809164105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roy C, Togneri J, Hay E. An inter-rater reliability study of the Barthel Index. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 1988;11:67–70.10.1097/00004356-198803000-00010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinar D, Gross C, Bronstein K. Reliability of the Activities of Daily Living scale and its use in telephone interview. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1987;68:723–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1989;42:703–709.10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haan R, Limburg M, Schuling J. Clinimetric evaluation of the Barthel Index, a measure of limitations in daily activities. Netherlands Tijdschr. Geneeskd. 1993b;137:917–921.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson P, Wolfe C, Warburton F. Longer term quality of life and outcome in stroke patients: is the Barthel index alone an adequate measure of outcome? Qual. Saf. Health Care. 1997;6:125–130.10.1136/qshc.6.3.125
   Google Scholar
• Wade D, Hewer R. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1987;50:177–182.10.1136/jnnp.50.2.177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie C. Measuring end results of rehabilitation of patients with stroke. Public Health Rep. 1967;82:893–898.10.2307/4593156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60: prognosis. Scott Med J. 1957;2:200–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lai S, Duncan P. Stroke recovery profile and the modified Rankin assessment. Neuroepidemiology. 2001;20:26–30.10.1159/000054754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Swieten J, Koudstaal P, Visser M, Schouten H, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19:604–607.10.1161/01.STR.19.5.604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young F, Lees K, Weir C. Strengthening acute stroke trials through optimal use of disability end points. Stroke. 2003;34:2676–2680.10.1161/01.STR.0000096210.36741.E7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson J, Hareendran A, Grant M. Improving the assessment of outcomes in stroke: use of a structured interview to assign grades on the modified Rankin Scale. Stroke. 2002;33:2243–2246.10.1161/01.STR.0000027437.22450.BD
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke. 1988;19:1497–1500.10.1161/01.STR.19.12.1497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995. p. 111–112.
   Google Scholar
• Young F, Lees K, Weir C. Improving trial power through use of prognosis-adjusted end points. Stroke. 2005;36:597–601.10.1161/01.STR.0000154856.42135.85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir C, Kaste M, Lees K. Targeting neuroprotection clinical trials to ischemic stroke patients with potential to benefit from therapy. Stroke. 2004;35:2111–2116.10.1161/01.STR.0000136556.34438.b3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray G, Barer D, Choi S, Fernandes H, Gregson B, Lees K, et al. Design and analysis of phase III trials with ordered outcome scales: the concept of the sliding dichotomy. J. Neurotrauma. 2005;22:511–517.10.1089/neu.2005.22.511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilley B, Marler J, Geller N, Lu M, Legler J, Brott T, et al. Use of a global test for multiple outcomes in stroke trials with application to the national institute of neurological disorders and stroke t-PA stroke trial. Stroke. 1996;27:2136–2142.10.1161/01.STR.27.11.2136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W. Multivariate data analysis with readings. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Spector P. Summated rating scale construction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1992.10.4135/9781412986038
   Google Scholar
• Hollander M, Koudstaal P, Bots M, Grobbee D, Hoffman A, Breteler M. Incidence, risk, and case fatality of first ever stroke in the elderly population. The Rotterdam study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2003;74(3):317–321.10.1136/jnnp.74.3.317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation. 2007;115:169–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcone G, Chong J. Gender differences in stroke among older adults. Geriatr. Aging. 2007;10(08):497–500.
   Google Scholar
• Baker K, Cano S, Playford D. Outcome measurement in stroke. A scale selection strategy. Stroke. 2011;42:1787–1794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen K, Olsen T. One-month to 10-year survival in the Copenhagen stroke study: interactions between stroke severity and other prognostic indicators. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2010;20(2):117–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bath P, Lees K, Schellinger P, Altman H, Bland M, Hogg C, et al. Statistical analysis of the primary outcome in acute stroke trials. Stroke. 2012;43(4):1171–1178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Geddes J, Chamberlain MA. The Barthel Index: an ordinal score or interval level measure? Clinical Rehabilitation. 1996;10:301–308.10.1177/026921559601000407
   Google Scholar
• Weimar C, Ali M, Lees K, Bluhmki E, Donnan G, Diener H, for the VISTA Steering Committee. The Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA): results and impact on future stroke trials and management of stroke patients. World Stroke Organisation. Int. J. Stroke. 2010;5:103–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar