Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the 10-meter ambulation test in hemiparesis is better barefoot at maximal speed

References

• Wade DT, Wood VA, Heller A, Maggs J, Langton Hewer R. Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first 3 months. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1987;9(1):25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud. 1990;12(1):6–9.10.3109/03790799009166594
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans MD, Goldie PA, Hill KD. Systematic and random error in repeated measurements of temporal and distance parameters of gait after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:725–729.10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90080-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green J, Forster A, Young J. Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:306–314.10.1191/0269215502cr495oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulk GD, Echternach JL. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of gait speed in individuals undergoing rehabilitation after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2008;32(1):8–13.10.1097/NPT0b013e31816593c0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters DM, Middleton A, Donley JW, Blanck EL, Fritz SL. Concurrent validity of walking speed values calculated via the GAITRite electronic walkway and 3 meter walk test in the chronic stroke population. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014;30(3):183–188.10.3109/09593985.2013.845805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosak M, Smith T. Comparison of the 2-, 6-, and 12-minute walk tests in patients with stroke. J Rehab Res Dev. 2005;42(1):103–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam HS, Lau FW, Chan GK, Sykes K. The validity and reliability of a 6-metre timed walk for the functional assessment of patients with stroke. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26(4):251–255.10.3109/09593980903015235
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gijbels D, Eijnde BO, Feys P. Comparison of the 2- and 6-minute walk test in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2011;17:1269–1272.10.1177/1352458511408475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalgas U, Kjølhede T, Gijbels D, et al. Aerobic intensity and pacing pattern during the six-minute walk test in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46:59–66.10.2340/16501977-1231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias S, Nayak USL, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: the “get-up and go” test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67:387–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(8):1641–1647.10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flansbjer UB, Holmbäck AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(2):75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botolfsen P, Helbostad JL, Moe-Nilssen R, Wall JC. Reliability and concurrent validity of the expanded timed up-and-go test in older people with impaired mobility. Physiother Res Int. 2008;13(2):94–106.10.1002/(ISSN)1471-2865
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faria CD, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Silva EB, Nadeau S. Expanded timed up and go test with subjects with stroke: reliability and comparisons with matched healthy controls. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(6):1034–1038.10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JS, Chu DY, Jeon HS. Reliability and validity of the L test in participants with chronic stroke. Physiotherapy. 2015;101(2):161–165.10.1016/j.physio.2014.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley AM, Lanzarone S, Bosman JM, et al. Ecological validity of walking speed assessment after traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2004;19:341–348.10.1097/00001199-200407000-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “up & go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142–148.10.1111/jgs.1991.39.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracies JM. Coefficients of impairment in deforming spastic paresis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;58(3):173–178.10.1016/j.rehab.2015.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–1457.10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–428.10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reh W, Scheffler B. Significance tests and confidence intervals for coefficients of variation. Comput Stat Data Anal. 1996;22(4):449–452.10.1016/0167-9473(96)83707-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden MG, Behrman AL, Neptune RR, Gregory CM, Kautz SA. Locomotor rehabilitation of individuals with chronic stroke: difference between responders and nonresponders. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(5):856–862.10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Loo MA, Moseley AM, Bosman JM, de Bie RA, Hassett L. Inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of walking speed measurement after traumatic brain injury. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(7):775–779.10.1191/0269215503cr677oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuter A, Edwards R, deGeoffroy A, Mergler D, Hundnell K. Quantification of neuromotor function for detection of the effects of manganese. Neurotoxicology. 1999;20:355–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid A, Duncan PW, Studenski S, et al. Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful. Stroke. 2007;38:2096–2100.10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.475921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar