853
Views
31
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Noninvasive brain stimulation combined with other therapies improves gait speed after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 201-213 | Received 01 Jul 2018, Accepted 27 Dec 2018, Published online: 08 Feb 2019

References

  • Lavados PM, Hennis AJ, Fernandes JG, et al. Stroke epidemiology, prevention, and management strategies at a regional level: Latin America and the Caribbean. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(4):362–372. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70003-0.
  • Kim H, Lee G, Song C. Effect of functional electrical stimulation with mirror therapy on upper extremity motor function in poststroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23(4):655–661. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.06.017.
  • Robinson CA, Shumway-Cook A, Matsuda PN, Ciol MA. Understanding physical factors associated with participation in community ambulation following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(12):1033–1042. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.520803.
  • Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741–754. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4.
  • Richards CL, Malouin F, Dean C. Gait in stroke: assessment and rehabilitation. Clin Geriatr Med. 1999;15:833–855.
  • Xu Y, Hou QH, Russell SD, et al. Neuroplasticity in post-stroke gait recovery and noninvasive brain stimulation. Neural Regen Res. 2015;10(12):2072–2080. doi:10.4103/1673-5374.172329.
  • Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004;55(3):400–409. doi:10.1002/ana.10848.
  • Peters DM, Fridriksson J, Stewart JC, et al. Cortical disconnection of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex is associated with gait speed and upper extremity motor impairment in chronic left hemispheric stroke. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39(1):120–132. doi:10.1002/hbm.23829.
  • Fleming MK, Pavlou M, Newham DJ, Sztriha L, Teo JT. Non-invasive brain stimulation for the lower limb after stroke: what do we know so far and what should we be doing next? Disabil Rehabil. 2016;39(7):714-720. doi:10.3109/09638288.2016.1161835.
  • Klomjai W, Lackmy-Vallee A, Roche N, Pradat-Diehl P, Marchand-Pauvert V, Katz R. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation in motor rehabilitation after stroke: an update. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;58(4):220–224. doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2015.05.006.
  • Polania R, Nitsche MA, Ruff CC. Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21(2):174–187. doi:10.1038/s41593-017-0054-4.
  • Chung SW, Hill AT, Rogasch NC, Hoy KE, Fitzgerald PB. Use of theta-burst stimulation in changing excitability of motor cortex: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;63:43–64. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.01.008.
  • Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001;57:1899–1901.
  • Ji SG, Cha HG, Kim KJ, Kim MK. Effects of motor imagery practice in conjunction with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on stroke patients. J Magn. 2014;19(2):181–184. doi:10.4283/JMAG.2014.19.2.181.
  • Ji SG, Kim MK. The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the Gait of acute stroke patients. J Magn. 2015;20(2):129–132. doi:10.4283/JMAG.2015.20.2.129.
  • Rastgoo M, Naghdi S, Nakhostin Ansari N, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on lower extremity spasticity and motor function in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(19):1918–1926. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1107780.
  • Wang RY, Tseng HY, Liao KK, Wang CJ, Lai KL, Yang YR. rTMS combined with task-oriented training to improve symmetry of interhemispheric corticomotor excitability and gait performance after stroke: a randomized trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(3):222–230. doi:10.1177/1545968311423265.
  • Picelli A, Chemello E, Castellazzi P, et al. Combined effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) on robot-assisted gait training in patients with chronic stroke: a pilot, double blind, randomized controlled trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33(3):357–368. doi:10.3233/RNN-140474.
  • Chang MC, Kim DY, Park DH. Enhancement of cortical excitability and lower limb motor function in patients with stroke by transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2015;8(3):561–566. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.411.
  • Fusco A, Assenza F, Iosa M, et al. The ineffective role of cathodal tDCS in enhancing the functional motor outcomes in early phase of stroke rehabilitation: an experimental trial. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:547290. doi:10.1155/2014/547290.
  • Geroin C, Picelli A, Munari D, Waldner A, Tomelleri C, Smania N. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted gait training in patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary comparison. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(6):537–548. doi:10.1177/0269215510389497.
  • Tahtis V, Kaski D, Seemungal BM. The effect of single session bi-cephalic transcranial direct current stimulation on gait performance in sub-acute stroke: a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32(4):527–532. doi:10.3233/RNN-140393.
  • Danzl MM, Chelette KC, Lee K, Lykins D, Sawaki L. Brain stimulation paired with novel locomotor training with robotic gait orthosis in chronic stroke: a feasibility study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(1):67–76. doi:10.3233/NRE-130929.
  • Seo HG, Lee WH, Lee SH, Yi Y, Kim KD, Oh BM. Robotic-assisted gait training combined with transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic stroke patients: a pilot double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017;35(5):527–536. doi:10.3233/RNN-170745.
  • Manji A, Amimoto K, Matsuda T, Wada Y, Inaba A, Ko S. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the supplementary motor area body weight-supported treadmill gait training in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Neurosci Lett. 2018;662:302–305. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2017.10.049.
  • Tanaka S, Takeda K, Otaka Y, et al. Single session of transcranial direct current stimulation transiently increases knee extensor force in patients with hemiparetic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(6):565–569. doi:10.1177/1545968311402091.
  • Sohn MK, Jee SJ, Kim YW. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on postural stability and lower extremity strength in hemiplegic stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013;37(6):759–765. doi:10.5535/arm.2013.37.6.759.
  • Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 5. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336–341. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007.
  • Robinson KA, Dickersin K. Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:150–153.
  • Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120(12):2008–2039. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016.
  • Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR. Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome assessment. Phys Ther. 1986;66:1530–1539.
  • Cameron D, Bohannon RW. Criterion validity of lower extremity Motricity Index scores. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14(2):208–211. doi:10.1191/026921500675786655.
  • Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):401–406. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015.
  • Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36(3):1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03.
  • Graef P, Dadalt ML, Rodrigues DA, Stein C, Pagnussat Ade S. Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with upper-limb training for improving function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2016;369:149–158. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2016.08.016.
  • Weinrich M, Good DC, Reding M, et al. Timing, intensity, and duration of rehabilitation for hip fracture and stroke: report of a workshop at the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004;18(1):12–28. doi:10.1177/0888439003262041.
  • Polese JC, Ada L, Dean CM, Nascimento LR, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Treadmill training is effective for ambulatory adults with stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2013;59(2):73–80. doi:10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70159-0.
  • Jeffery DT, Norton JA, Roy FD, Gorassini MA. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2007;182(2):281–287. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-1093-y.
  • Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;3:CD009645.
  • Li Y, Fan J, Yang J, He C, Li S. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on walking ability after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018;36(1):59–71. doi:10.3233/RNN-170770.
  • Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology-perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2007;3(7):383–393. doi:10.1038/ncpneuro0530.
  • Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(12):861–872. doi:10.1038/nrn2735.
  • Kang N, Summers JJ, Cauraugh JH. Non-invasive brain stimulation improves paretic limb force production: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Stimul. 2016;9(5):662–670. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2016.05.005.
  • Bikson M, Grossman P, Thomas C, et al. Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence based update 2016. Brain Stimul. 2016;9(5):641–661. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.