Clinimetric properties of the shortened Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the assessment of arm motor function in hemiparetic patients after stroke

References

• Santisteban L, Teremetz M, Bleton JP, Baron JC, Maier MA, Lindberg PG. Upper limb outcome measures used in stroke rehabilitation studies: a systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0154792. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR, Stratford PW, Gowland C. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther. 1993;73(7):447–454. doi:10.1093/ptj/73.7.447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):232–240. doi:10.1177/154596802401105171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim IH. di Bella P, Johnson G. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, action research arm test and box and block test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(4):404–411. doi:10.1191/0269215505cr832oa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabadi MH, Rabadi FM. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(7):962–966. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF, Lee S, Hsieh CL, Lin JH. Psychometric comparisons of 2 versions of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale and 2 versions of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(6):737–744. doi:10.1177/1545968308315999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodbury ML, Velozo CA, Richards LG, Duncan PW, Studenski S, Lai SM. Longitudinal stability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(8):1563–1569. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker K, Cano SJ, Playford ED. Outcome measurement in stroke: a scale selection strategy. Stroke. 2011;42(6):1787–1794. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.608505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh YW, Hsueh IP, Chou YT, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL, Kwakkel G. Development and validation of a short form of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale in patients with stroke. Stroke. 2007;38(11):3052–3054. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.490730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu TS, Wu CY, Lin KC, et al. Psychometric comparison of the shortened Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the streamlined wolf motor function test in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(11):1043–1047. doi:10.1177/0269215511431474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou WH, Shih CL, Chou YT, et al. Development of a computerized adaptive testing system of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(6):1014–1020. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amano S, Umeji A, Uchita A, et al. Clinimetric properties of the Fugl-Meyer assessment with adapted guidelines for the assessment of arm function in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018:1–9. doi:10.1080/10749357.2018.1481569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platz T. ARM, Arm Rehabilitation Measurement: Manual for Performance and Scoring of the Fugl-Meyer Test (Arm Section), Action Research Arm Test, and the Box-and-Block Test. Baden-Baden: Deutscher Wissenschafts-Verlag; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Vignolo M, McCulloch K. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity motor activity log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke. 2005;36(11):2493–2496. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000185928.90848.2e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Team RC. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria:R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;21(9):1331–1335. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of Clinical Research: Application to Practice. Stamford, USA: Appleton & Lange; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–549. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):651–657. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar