Translation and validation of the stroke self-efficacy questionnaire to a Portuguese version in stroke survivors

References

• Feigin VL, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders during 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(11):877–897. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30299-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MD, McKevitt C, Lawrence E, Rudd AG, Wolfe CDA. Clinical determinants of long-term quality of life after stroke. Age Ageing. 2007;36(3):316–322. doi:10.1093/ageing/afm014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-Efficacy. In: The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Vol. 4. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2010:71–81. doi:10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0836.
   Google Scholar
• Jones F, Partridge C, Reid F. The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: measuring individual confidence in functional performance after stroke. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(7B):244–252. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02333.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo SHS, Chang AM, Chau JPC. Translation and validation of a Chinese version of the stroke self-efficacy questionnaire in community-dwelling stroke survivors. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23(3):163–169. doi:10.1080/10749357.2015.1122265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallolio L, Messina R, Calugi S, et al. Self-management and self-efficacy in stroke survivors: validation of the Italian version of the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;54(1):68–74. doi:10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04451-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen LQ, Pallesen H. Cross-cultural adaptation of the stroke self-efficacy questionnaire – Denmark (SSEQ-DK). Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25(6):1–7. doi:10.1080/10749357.2018.1469713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topçu S, Oğuz S. Translation and validation study for the stroke self-efficacy questionnaire in stroke survivors. Int J Nurs Pract. 2018;24(4):e12646. doi:10.1111/ijn.12646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson G, Baum MC, Wolf TJ, Connor LT. Perceived participation after stroke: the influence of activity retention, reintegration, and perceived recovery. Am J Occup Ther. 2013;67(6):e131–e138. doi:10.5014/ajot.2013.008292.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones F, Riazi A. Self-efficacy and self-management after stroke: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(10):797–810. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.511415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–3191. doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, et al. Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable taskforce. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(5):444–450. doi:10.1177/1747493017711816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brucki SMD, Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Bertolucci PHF, Okamoto IH. Suggestions for utilization of the mini-mental state examination in Brazil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2003;61(3B):777–781. doi:10.1590/S0004-282X2003000500014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riberto M, Miyazaki MH, SSH J, Sakamoto H, Pinto PPN, Battistella LR. Validation of the Brazilian version of functional independence measure. Acta Fisiátrica. 2004;11(2):3–7. doi:10.5935/0104-7795.20040003.
   Google Scholar
• Carod-Artal FJ, Coral LF, Trizotto DS, Moreira CM. The stroke impact scale 3.0. Stroke. 2008;39(9):2477–2484. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas S, Prieto G, Simões MR, Santana I. Psychometric properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): an analysis using the rasch model. Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(1):65–83. doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.870231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AT. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4(6):561. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangel ESS, Belasco AGS, Diccini S. Quality of life of patients with stroke rehabilitation. ACTA Paul Enferm. 2013;26(2):205–212. doi:10.1590/S010321002013000200016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Investigating rating scale category utility. J Outcome Meas. 1999;3(2):103–122. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10204322.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–745. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElroy C, Esterhuizen P. Compassionate communication in acute healthcare: establishing the face and content validity of a questionnaire. J Res Nurs. 2017;22(1–2):72–88. doi:10.1177/1744987116678903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs DE. Declare your ICC type. Phys Ther. 1986;66(9):1431. doi:10.1093/ptj/66.9.1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riazi A, Aspden T, Jones F. Stroke self-efficacy questionnaire: A Rasch-refined measure of confidence post stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(5):406–412. doi:10.2340/16501977-1789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382–386. doi:10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpershoek C, van der Bijl J, Hafsteinsdóttir TB. Self-efficacy and its influence on recovery of patients with stroke: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(9):1876–1894. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05659.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tielemans NS, Schepers VP, Visser-Meily JM, Post MW, van Heugten CM. Associations of proactive coping and self-efficacy with psychosocial outcomes in individuals after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(8):1484–1491. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.04.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragazzi NL. Commentary on : self-care self-efficacy, religious participation and depression as predictors of post-stroke self-care among underserved. Health Psychol Res. 2014;2:89–90. doi:10.4081/hpr.2014.1641.
   Google Scholar
• Danks KA, Pohlig RT, Roos M, Wright TR, Reisman DS. Relationship between walking capacity, biopsychosocial factors, self-efficacy, and walking activity in persons poststroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2016;40(4):232–238. doi:10.1097/NPT.0000000000000143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French MA, Moore MF, Pohlig R, Reisman D. Self-efficacy mediates the relationship between balance/walking performance, activity, and participation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23(2):77–83. doi:10.1080/10749357.2015.1110306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewthwaite R, Winstein CJ, Lane CJ, et al. Accelerating stroke recovery: body structures and functions, activities, participation, and quality of life outcomes from a large rehabilitation trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018;32(2):150–165. doi:10.1177/1545968318760726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar