References
- Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke. 2001;32(6):1279–1284.doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.6.1279.
- Brunnstrom S. Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia: based on sequential recovery stages. Phys Ther. 1966;46(4):357–375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/46.4.357.
- Sullivan JE, Crowner BE, Kluding PM. et al. Outcome measures for individuals with stroke: process and recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association neurology section task force. Phys Ther. 2013;93:1383–1396. doi:https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120492.
- Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke:a critical review of its measurement properties [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t, Review]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16:232–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/154596802401105171.
- Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther. 1983;63:1606–1610. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/63.10.1606.
- Amano S, Umeji A, Takebayashi T, et al. Clinimetric properties of the Fugl-Meyer assessment with adapted guidelines for the assessment of arm function in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25(7):500–508.doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2018.1484987.
- Sullivan KJ, Tilson JK, Cen SY, et al. Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke:standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials. Stroke. 2011;42 (2):427–432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/stroke.110.592766.
- Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 health survey for use in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1037–1044. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00095-x.
- Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191.doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146.
- Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, et al. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(9):556‒561.doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199503023320902.
- Volpato S, Cavalieri M, Sioulis F, et al. Predictive value of the short physical performance battery following hospitalization in older patients. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66(1):89‒96.doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glq167.
- Ladis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33 (1): 159–174.
- Altman DG, Bland JM. Bland JM: measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician. 1983;32(3):307–317. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2987937.
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Altman DG: measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204.
- Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, et al. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(2):75–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970410017215.
- Smidt N, Vander Windt DA, Assendelft WJ, et al. Interob- server reproducibility of the assessment of severity of com- plaints, grip strength, and pressure pain threshold in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1145–1150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.33728.
- Kaitia DR, Ana PS, Marchese RR, et al. Fugl-Meyer assessment scores are related with kinematic measures in people with chronic hemiparesis after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29(1):104463.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104463.
- Astrid B, Bjørn H. Norwegin reference values for the short physical performance battery(SPPB):the Tromsø Study. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19:216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1234-8.
- Selna M, Linda D, Beach LJ, et al. Functinal outcomes in ICU-what should we be using?-an observantional study. Crite Care. 2015;19(1):127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-029-5.
- Duncan PW, Lai SM, Keighley J. Defing psot-stroke recovery:implications for design and interpretation of drug trials. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39(5):835–841. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0028-3908(00)00003-4.
- Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matcher D, et al. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke.Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke. 1992;23(8):1084–1089.doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.23.8.1084.
- Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II:time course of recovery.The copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:406–412.
- Thomas P, Cosima P, van Wijck F, et al. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, action research arm test and box and block test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(4):404–411.doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215505cr832oa.
- Ahamad H, Einas S, Anwer S, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of three scales for measuring balance in patients with chronic stroke. BMC Neurol. 2018;18(1):141.doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1146-9.