Acceptability of constraint induced movement therapy: influence of perceived difficulty and expected treatment outcome

References

• Conoley CW, Conoley JC, Ivey DC, Scheel MJ. Enhancing consultation by matching the consultee’s perspectives. J Couns Dev. 1991;69(6):546–549. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1991.tb02639.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheel M, Seaman S, Roach K, Mullin T, Mahoney K, Hill CE. Client implementation of therapist recommendations predicted by client perception of fit, difficulty of implementation, and therapist influence. J Couns Psychol. 1999;46(3):308–316. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.46.3.308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asano M, Duquette P, Andersen R, Lapierre Y, Mayo NE. Exercise barriers and preferences among women and men with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(5):353–361. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.742574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten P, McPherson KM, Kayes NM, Theadom A, McCambridge A. Bridging the goal intention–action gap in rehabilitation: a study of if-then implementation intentions in neurorehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(12):1073–1081. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.955137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerli L, Krewer C, Gassert R, Müller F, Riener R, Lünenburger L. Validation of a mechanism to balance exercise difficulty in robot-assisted upper-extremity rehabilitation after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9(1):6. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-9-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg J, Prushinskaya O, Harris JD, et al. Utilization of a patient-centered asthma passport tool in a subspecialty clinic. J Asthma. 2018;55(2):180–187. doi:10.1080/02770903.2017.1323916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer R, Choi H, Mase R, Fagerlin A, Spencer M, Heisler M. Mediators and moderators of improvements in medication adherence: secondary analysis of a community health worker-led diabetes medication self-management support program. Health Educ Behav. 2017;44(2):285–296. doi:10.1177/1090198116656331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. Exerc Sports Sci Rev. 1977;4:335–374.
   Google Scholar
• Taub E. Somatosensory Deafferentation Research with Monkeys: Implications for Rehabilitation Medicine. Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical Applications. Philadelphia: Williams and Wilkins; 1980:371–401.
   Google Scholar
• Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Edwards DF, Birkenmeier RL, Dromerick AW. Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(9):1693–1700. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G. Constraint-Induced Movement therapy: a paradigm for translating advances in behavioral neuroscience into rehabilitation treatments. In: Berntson GG, Cacioppo JT, eds. Handbook of Neuroscience for the Behavioral Sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009:1296–1314.
   Google Scholar
• Hatem SM, Saussez G, Della Faille M, et al. Rehabilitation of motor function after stroke: a multiple systematic review focused on techniques to stimulate upper extremity recovery. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:442. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741–754. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffin E, Hummel FC. Restoring motor functions after stroke: multiple approaches and opportunities. Neuroscientist. 2018;24(4):400–416. doi:10.1177/1073858417737486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbetta D, Sirtori V, Castellini G, Moja L, Gatti R. Constraint-Induced Movement therapy for upper extremities in people with stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10. 2015;CD004433.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw SE, Morris DM, Uswatte G, McKay S, Meythaler JM, Taub E. Constraint-Induced Movement therapy for recovery of upper-limb function following traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(6):769–778. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2005.06.0094.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mark VW, Taub E, Uswatte G, et al. Phase II randomized controlled trial of Constraint-Induced Movement therapy in multiple sclerosis. Part 1: effects on real-world function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018;32(3):223–232. doi:10.1177/1545968318761050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Ramey SL, DeLuca S, Echols K. Efficacy of Constraint-Induced Movement therapy for children with cerebral palsy with asymmetric motor impairment. Pediatrics. 2004;113(2):305–312. doi:10.1542/peds.113.2.305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Griffin A, Nick J, Gammons K, Uswatte G, Law CR. Pediatric CI therapy for stroke-induced hemiparesis in young children. Dev Neurorehabil. 2007;10(1):3–18. doi:10.1080/13638490601151836.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson ML, Taub E, Harper LH, et al. An enhanced protocol for Constraint-Induced Aphasia therapy II: a case series. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;23(1):60–72. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0168).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleet A, Che M, Mackay-Lyons M, et al. Examining the use of constraint-induced movement therapy in canadian neurological occupational and physical therapy. Physiother Can. 2014;66(1):60–71. doi:10.3138/ptc.2012-61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedlow K, Lennon S, Wilson C. Application of Constraint-Induced Movement therapy in clinical practice: an online survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(2):276–282. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viana R, Teasell R. Barriers to the implementation of Constraint-Induced Movement therapy into practice. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19(2):104–114. doi:10.1310/tsr1902-104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Lum PS, Hardin P, Mark VW, Uswatte G. AutoCITE: automated delivery of CI therapy with reduced effort by therapists. Stroke. 2005;36(6):1301–1304. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000166043.27545.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel L, Howard W, Braun D, Page SJ. Opinions of Constraint-Induced Movement therapy among therapists in southwestern Ohio. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19(3):268–275. doi:10.1310/tsr1903-268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, Bond Q, Johnston MV. Stroke patients‘ and therapists‘ opinions of Constraint-Induced Movement therapy. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(1):55–60. doi:10.1191/0269215502cr473oa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, et al. Method for enhancing real-world use of a more affected arm in chronic stroke: transfer package of constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke. 2013;44(5):1383–1388. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner BF. The Behaviour of Organisms. New York: Appleton Century Crofts; 1938.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner BF. The Technology of Teaching. New York: Appleton Century Crofts; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Taub E, Crago JE, Burgio LD, et al. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994;61(2):281–293. doi:10.1901/jeab.1994.61-281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW, et al. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of CI therapy for rehabilitation of upper extremity motor deficit: the Bringing Rehabilitation to American Veterans Everywhere project. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019;34(4):268–279. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006;67(7):1189–1194. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000238164.90657.c2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Foo WL, Olmstead H, Lopez K, Holand A, Simms LB. Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(7):1498–1501. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Knol DL, De Vet HCW, Bouter LM. Clinimetric properties of the Motor Activity Log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2004;35(6):1410–1414. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000126900.24964.7e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989;104(2):125–132. doi:10.1016/S0014-4886(89)80005-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW, Taub E. The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(6):750–755. doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.23183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer A, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(7):1635–1639. doi:10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodics TM, Nakatsuka K, Upreti B, Alex A, Smith PS, Pezzullo JC. Wolf Motor Function Test for characterizing moderate to severe hemiparesis in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(11):1963–1967. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm JW, Self EA. The intensity of motivation. Annu Rev Psychol. 1989;40(1):109–131. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000545.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haddad MM, Uswatte G, Taub E, Barghi A, Mark VW. Relation of depressive symptoms to outcome of CI movement therapy after stroke. Rehabil Psychol. 2017;62(4):509–515. doi:10.1037/rep0000171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright RA, Wadley VG, Pharr RP, Butler M. Interactive influence of self-reported ability and avoidant task demand on anticipatory cardiovascular responsivity. J Res Pers. 1994;28(1):68–86. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1994.1007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freydefont L, Gollwitzer PM, Oettingen G. Goal striving strategies and effort mobilization: when implementation intentions reduce effort-related cardiac activity during task performance. Int J Psychophysiol. 2016;107:44–53. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.06.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascoe GC. Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis. Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3–4):185–210. doi:10.1016/0149-7189(83)90002-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheon JW. Causal relationships between background characteristics, service utilization, satisfaction, and service outcomes (school performance): a path analysis. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2009;31(9):957–962. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros D, Gros K, Acierno R, Frueh B, Morland L. Relation between treatment satisfaction and treatment outcome in veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2013;35(4):522–530. doi:10.1007/s10862-013-9361-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson EE, Beckman A, Wihlborg A, Persson S, Troein M. Satisfaction with rehabilitation in relation to self-perceived quality of life and function among patients with stroke - a 12 month follow-up. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013;27(2):373–379. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01041.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, King D, Morris D, Crago J, Chatterjee A. A placebo-controlled trial of Constraint-Induced Movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37(4):1045–1049. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000206463.66461.97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly KM, Borstad AL, Kline D, Gauthier LV. Improved quality of life following Constraint-Induced Movement therapy is associated with gains in arm use, but not motor improvement. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25(7):467–474. doi:10.1080/10749357.2018.1481605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar