References
- Térémetz M, Colle F, Hamdoun S, Maier MA, Lindberg PG. A novel method for the quantification of key components of manual dexterity after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12(1):64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0054-0.
- Alberts JL, Wolf SL. The use of kinetics as a marker for manual dexterity after stroke and stroke recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16(4):223–236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1604-223.
- Johansson GM, Häger CK. A modified standardized nine hole peg test for valid and reliable kinematic assessment of dexterity post-stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0479-y.
- Broeks JG, Lankhorst G, Rumping K, Prevo A. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21(8):357–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/096382899297459.
- Wang T-N, Lin K-C, Wu C-Y, Chung C-Y, Pei Y-C, Teng Y-K. Validity, responsiveness, and clinically important difference of the ABILHAND questionnaire in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(7):1086–1091. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.020.
- Nelson EC, Eftimovska E, Lind C, Hager A, Wasson JH, Lindblad S. Patient reported outcome measures in practice. Bmj. 2015;350.
- Vanbellingen T, Nyffeler T, Nef T, Kwakkel G, Bohlhalter S, van Wegen EE. Reliability and validity of a new dexterity questionnaire (DextQ-24) in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;33:78–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.09.015.
- Vanbellingen T, Filius SJ, Nyffeler T, van Wegen EE. Usability of videogame-based dexterity training in the early rehabilitation phase of stroke patients: a pilot study. Front Neurol. 2017;8:654. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00654.
- Aaronson N, Acquadro C, Alonso J, et al. International quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. Qual Life Res. 1992;1(5):349–351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434949.
- Bujang MA, Baharum N. A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: a review. Arch Orofacial Sci. 2017;12:1.
- McMillan GP, Hanson TE. Sample size requirements for establishing clinical test–retest standards. Ear Hear. 2014;35(2):283–286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000438377.15003.6b.
- Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hébert R, É D, Mercier L. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(7):751–755. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9993(94)90130-9.
- Van Der Lee J, Beckerman H, Knol D, De Vet H, Bouter L. Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2004;35(6):1410–1414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000126900.24964.7e.
- Desrosiers J, Hebert R, Bravo G, Dutil E. The Purdue Pegboard Test: normative data for people aged 60 and over. Disabil Rehabil. 1995;17(5):217–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289509166638.
- Piedmont RL. Inter-item correlations. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-being Research. 2014:3303–3304.
- van Bloemendaal M, Kokkeler AM. van de Port IG. The shuttle walk test: a new approach to functional walking capacity measurements for patients after stroke? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(1):163–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.012.
- Gorsuch RL. Exploratory factor analysis: its role in item analysis. J Pers Assess. 1997;68(3):532–560. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6803_5.
- Rooney R. Statistical Evidence in Medical Trials: What Do the Data Really Tell Us? Oxford University Press Stephen D. Simon. OUP, 2006.£ 65. ISBN 0 19 856760 X; 2006.
- Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke. 1988;19(12):1497–1500. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.19.12.1497.
- Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(5):459–468. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00206-1.
- Proud EL, Miller KJ, Bilney B, Morris ME, McGinley JL. Construct validity of the 9-Hole Peg Test and Purdue Pegboard Test in people with mild to moderately severe Parkinson’s disease. Physiotherapy. 2020;107:202–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2019.12.002.