Clinical interpretation and cutoff scores for manual ability measured by the ABILHAND questionnaire in people with stroke

References

• Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(4):394–398. doi:10.1016/0003-9993(94)90161-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson HC, Parziali M, Danielsson A, Sunnerhagen KS. Outcome and upper extremity function within 72 hours after first occasion of stroke in an unselected population at a stroke unit. A part of the SALGOT study. BMC Neurol. 2012;12(1):162. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-12-162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broeks J G, GJ L, Rumping K, Prevo AJH. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil and Rehabil. 1999;21(8):357–364. doi:10.1080/096382899297459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobkin BH. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(16):1677–1684. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp043511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt Murphy M, Resteghini C, Feys P, Lamers I. An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke. BMC Neurol. 2015;15(1):29. doi:10.1186/s12883-015-0292-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Na L, Borschmann K, et al. Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(5):451–461.doi:10.1177/1747493017711813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burridge J, Alt Murphy M, Buurke J. et al. A systematic review of international clinical guidelines for rehabilitation of people with neurological conditions: what recommendations are made for upper limb assessment?. Front Neurol. 2019;10:567. doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the stroke impact scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(7):950–963. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00035-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penta M, Tesio L, Arnould C, Zancan A, Thonnard JL. The ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients: rasch-based validation and relationship to upper limb impairment. Stroke. 2001;32(7):1627–1634. doi:10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Wang TN, Lin KC, Wu CY, Chung CY, Pei YC, Teng YK. Validity, responsiveness, and clinically important difference of the ABILHAND questionnaire in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(7):1086–1091. http://S0003-9993(11)00085-2[pii]10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstrand E, Lindgren I, Lexell J, Brogardh C. Test-retest reliability of the ABILHAND questionnaire in persons with chronic stroke. PM R. 2014;6(4):324–331. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.09.015.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4(4):483–492. doi:10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl J, Held JPO, Verheyden G. et al. Consensus-based core set of outcome measures for clinical motor rehabilitation after stroke-a Delphi study. Front Neurol. 2020;11:875. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabadi MH, Rabadi FM. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(7):962–966. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essers B, Meyer S, De Bruyn N, et al. Mismatch between observed and perceived upper limb function: an eye-catching phenomenon after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(13):1545–1551.doi:10.1080/09638288.2018.1442504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Delden AL, Peper CL, Beek PJ, Kwakkel G. Match and mismatch between objective and subjective improvements in upper limb function after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(23):1961–1967. doi:10.3109/09638288.2013.768303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lieshout EC, JMA V-M, Nijland RH, Dijkhuizen RM, Kwakkel G. Comparison of self-reported vs observational clinical measures of improvement in upper limb capacity in patients after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2020;52(4):jrm00051. doi:10.2340/16501977-2661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier R, Hahn MG, Sahrmann SA, Edwards DF. Relationships between upper-limb functional limitation and self-reported disability 3 months after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(3):401–408. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2005.04.0075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstrand E, Alt Murphy M, Persson HC, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Sunnerhagen KS. Which clinical and sociodemographic determinants are associated with self-perceived manual ability at one year after stroke? Disabil Rehabil. 2019;1–8. doi:10.1080/09638288.2018.1557265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt Murphy M, Persson HC, Danielsson A, Broeren J, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Ks S. SALGOT - Stroke arm longitudinal study at the University of Gothenburg, prospective cohort study protocol. BMC Neurol. 2011;11(1):56. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-11-56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–349.doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131–2140. doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellone E, Savini S, Fida R, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the stroke impact scale 3.0. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015;30(3):229–241.doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the stroke impact scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:950–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer SC. A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(1):78–90. doi:10.1177/1545968307305353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford S, Slade M, Malaprade F, Turner-Stokes L. Evaluation of functional outcome measures for the hemiparetic upper limb: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(10):787–795. doi:10.2340/16501977-0276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordin A, Alt Murphy M, Danielsson A. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability at the item level of the action research arm test for patients with stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(8):738–745. doi:10.2340/16501977-1831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF, et al. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2009;89(8):840–850.doi:10.2522/ptj.20080285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez ED, Galeano CP, Barbosa NE, et al. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of Fugl-Meyer assessment of upper extremity in stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(9):652–659.doi:10.2340/16501977-2590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brott T, Adams HP Jr., Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20(7):864–870.doi:10.1161/01.str.20.7.864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, Van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19(5):604–607. doi:10.1161/01.STR.19.5.604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijland RH, van Wegen EE, Harmeling-van der Wel BC, Kwakkel G. Investigators E. Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery: early prediction of functional outcome after stroke: the EPOS cohort study. Stroke. 2010;41(4):745–750. doi:10.1161/strokeaha.109.572065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinear CM, Barber PA, Petoe M, Anwar S, Byblow WD. The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 8):2527–2535. doi:10.1093/brain/aws146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoonhorst MH, Nijland RH, Van Den Berg JS, Emmelot CH, Kollen BJ, How KG. Do fugl-Meyer arm motor scores relate to dexterity according to the action research arm test at 6 months poststroke? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(10):1845–1849. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.06.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain N, Alt Murphy M, Sunnerhagen KS. Upper limb kinematics in stroke and healthy controls using target-to-target task in virtual reality. Front Neurol. 2018;9:300. doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustren EL, Sunnerhagen KS, Alt Murphy M. Movement kinematics of the ipsilesional upper extremity in persons with moderate or mild stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(4):376–386. doi:10.1177/1545968316688798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt Murphy M, Willen C, Sunnerhagen KS. Movement kinematics during a drinking task are associated with the activity capacity level after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(9):1106–1115. doi:10.1177/15459683124482341545968312448234[pii].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson HC, Alt Murphy M, Danielsson A, Lundgren-Nilsson Å, Sunnerhagen KS. A cohort study investigating a simple, early assessment to predict upper extremity function after stroke - a part of the SALGOT study. BMC Neurol. 2015;15(1):92. doi:10.1186/s12883-015-0349-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pang MY, Harris JE, Eng JJ. A community-based upper-extremity group exercise program improves motor function and performance of functional activities in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(1):1–9. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safari S, Baratloo A, Elfil M, Negida A. Evidence based emergency medicine; part 5 receiver operating curve and area under the curve. Emerg (Tehran). 2016;4:111–113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hughes AM, Boucas SB, Burridge JH, et al. Evaluation of upper extremity neurorehabilitation using technology: a European delphi consensus study within the EU COST action network on robotics for neurorehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13(1):86.doi:10.1186/s12984-016-0192-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart JC, Cramer SC. Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke. Stroke. 2013;44(4):1111–1116. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.674671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar