Natural Allies? External Governance and Environmental Civil Society Organizations in the EU’s Eastern Partnership

References

• Ademmer, E., and L. Delcour. 2016. “With a Little Help from Russia? The European Union and Visa Liberalization with Post-Soviet States.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 57 (1): 89–112. doi:10.1080/15387216.2016.1178157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ademmer, E., L. Delcour, and K. Wolczuk. 2016. “Beyond Geopolitics: Exploring the Impact of the EU and Russia in the “Contested Neighborhood.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 57 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/15387216.2016.1183221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliyev, H. 2015. Post-Communist Civil Society and the Soviet Legacy: Challenges of Democratisation and Reform in the Caucasus. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrosio, T., A. Hall, and A. Obydenkova. 2021. “Sustainable Development Agendas of Regional International Organizations: The European Bank of Reconstruction and Development and the Eurasian Development Bank.” Problems of Post-Communism 1–13. doi: 10.1080/10758216.2021.1979412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt, M., and L. Coumel. 2019. “A Green End to the Red Empire? Ecological Mobilizations in the Soviet Union and Its Successor States, 1950–2000: A Decentralized Approach.” Ab Imperio 2019 (1): 105–24. doi:10.1353/imp.2019.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Axyonova, V., D. Cenuşa, and A. Gawrich. 2020. “International Negotiations and Domestic Change in the EU’s Eastern Neighborhood: Deconstructing Antidiscrimination Reforms in Moldova.” East European Politics and Societies 088832542096891. EarlyView. doi:10.1177/0888325420968911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axyonova, V., and F. Bossuyt. 2016. “Mapping the Substance of the EU’s Civil Society Support in Central Asia: From Neo-Liberal to State-Led Civil Society.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 49 (3): 207–17. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2016.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axyonova, V., S. Gerasymchuk, K. Kakachia, and A. Rosca. 2018. “The European Union as a Transformative Power, a Donor or a Security Provider?: The View from the Eastern Partnership Countries.” European Foreign Affairs Review 23:23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R., and D. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 611–39. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkvadze, K. 2016. “Cherry Picking EU Conditionality: Selective Compliance in Georgia’s Hybrid Regime.” Europe-Asia Studies 68 (3): 409–40. doi:10.1080/09668136.2016.1154138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A., and A. Buzogány. 2010. “Governing EU Accession in Transition Countries.” Acta Politica 45 (1–2): 158–82. doi:10.1057/ap.2009.26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bousac, J., L. Delcour, V. Rihácková, I. Solonenko, and G. Ter-Gabrielyan. 2012. Improving the EU Support for the Civil Society in Its Neighbourhood: Rethinking Procedures, Ensuring that Practices Evolve, Contract Expo/B/Afet/2012/32. Bruxelles: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Buzogány, A., and O. Costa. 2009. “Greening the Neighbourhood? The Environmental Dimension of the European Neighbourhood Policy in Morocco and Ukraine.” European Foreign Affairs Review 14 (4): 525–45.
   Google Scholar
• Buzogány, A. 2013. “Selective Adoption of EU Environmental Norms in Ukraine. Convergence Á La Carte.” Europe-Asia Studies 65 (4): 609–30. doi:10.1080/09668136.2013.766039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzogány, A. 2015. “Building Governance on Fragile Grounds: Lessons from Romania.” Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy 33 (5): 901–18. doi:10.1177/0263774X15605897.
   Google Scholar
• Buzogány, A. 2016. “EU-Russia Regulatory Competition and Business Interests in Post-Soviet Countries: The Case of Forestry and Chemical Security in Ukraine.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 57 (1): 138–59. doi:10.1080/15387216.2016.1163642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzogány, A. 2018a. “Civil Society Organisations beyond the European Union: Normative Expectations and Local Realities.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 14 (2): 187–205. doi:10.30950/jcer.v14i2.879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzogány, A. 2018b. “Neighbourhood Countries: Promoting Environmental Protection Close to Home.” C Adelle, K Biedenkopf, and D Torney. edited by, European Union External Environmental Policy, 233–52. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• CEE Bankwatch Network. 2018. “Shuakhevi Hydropower Plant.” Georgia. Accessed 12 January 2021. https://bankwatch.org/project/shuakhevi-hydropower-plant-georgia#project-background
   Google Scholar
• CEE Bankwatch. 2011. “Bankwatch Position on the Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy.” Accessed 12 January 2021. https://bankwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ENP_ENPI_position.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Císař, O 2010. “Externally Sponsored Contention: The Channelling of Environmental Movement Organisations in the Czech Republic after the Fall of Communism.” Environmental Politics 19(5): 736–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coumel, L., and M. Elie. 2013. “A Belated and Tragic Ecological Revolution: Nature, Disasters, and Green Activists in the Soviet Union and the Post-Soviet States, 1960s-2010s.” The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review 40 (2): 157–65. doi:10.1163/18763324-04002005.
   Google Scholar
• Damro, C., S. Gstöhl, and S. Schunz. 2017. The European Union’s Evolving External Engagement: Towards New Sectoral Diplomacies? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davidescu, S., and A. Buzogány. 2021. “Cutting Deals: Transnational Advocacy Networks and the European Union Timber Regulation at the Eastern Border.” The International Spectator 56 (3): 105–18. doi:10.1080/03932729.2021.1935680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, J.I. 1996. Eco-Nationalism: Anti-Nuclear Activism and National Identity in Russia, Lithuania, and Ukraine. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Del Castillo Fajardo, T. 2010. “Revisiting the External Dimension of the Environmental Policy of the European Union: Some Challenges Ahead.” Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 7 (4): 365–90. doi:10.1163/161372710X543217.
   Google Scholar
• Delcour, L., 2011. The Institutional Functioning of the Eastern Partnership: An Early Assessment, Working Paper, Eastern Partnership Review, No. 1, Estonian Centre for the Eastern Partnership, Tallinn.
   Google Scholar
• Delcour, L. 2016. “Multiple External Influences and Domestic Change in the Contested Neighborhood: The Case of Food Safety.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 57 (1): 43–65. doi:10.1080/15387216.2016.1183220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• della Porta, D., and M. Caiani. 2009. Social Movements and Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demchuk, A. L., M. Mišić, A. Obydenkova, and J. Tosun. 2021. “Environmental Conflict Management: A Comparative Cross-cultural Perspective of China and Russia.” Post-Communist Economies 1–23. doi: 10.1080/14631377.2021.1943915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EaP Index. 2019. “Environment and Climate Policy.” Accessed 12 January 2021. https://eap-csf.eu/eap-index-environment-and-climate-policy/
   Google Scholar
• EU-Ukraine Civil Society Platform. 2017. Joint Declaration. 4th meeting. Brussels. 18 May 2017. Accessed 12 January 2021. https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/resources/docs/joint-declaration.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2008. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: Eastern Partnership, Brussels, 3.12.2008, COM(2008) 823 Final, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, A., and J. Carmin. 2011. Environmental Mobilization and Organisations in Post-Socialist Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, A., and N. Wunsch. 2019. “Fostering Institutionalisation? The Impact of the EU Accession Process on State–Civil Society Relations in Serbia.” Acta Politica 54 (4): 607–24. doi:10.1057/s41269-018-0093-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, A. 2006. “Transnational Aid for Civil Society Development in Post-Socialist Europe: Democratic Consolidation or a New Imperialism?” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 22 (1): 115–34. doi:10.1080/13523270500508437.
   Google Scholar
• Freyburg, T., S. Lavenex, F. Schimmelfennig, T. Skripka, and A. Wetzel. 2016. Democracy Promotion by Functional Cooperation: The European Union and Its Neighbourhood. Abingdon: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Freyburg, T. 2012. “Planting the Seeds of Change Inside? Functional Cooperation with Authoritarian Regimes and Socialization into Democratic Governance.” World Political Science 8 (1). doi:10.1515/1935-6226.1110.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. 2016. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glasius, M., and A. Ishkanian. 2014. “Surreptitious Symbiosis: Engagement between Activists and NGOs.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green Alternative. 2006. “Environmental Governance in Georgia and How the EU Can Contribute to Its Strengthening.” Accessed 12 January 2021. https://greenalt.org/app/uploads/2021/04/Governance_ENG.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Green Alternative. 2016. “Assessing the Fulfillment of Environmental Commitments under Georgia’s Association Agenda for 2014-2015.” Accessed 12 January 2021. http://greenalt.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/policy_brief_Assessing_the_Fulfillment_of_Environmental_Commitments_eng_2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guérin, N., and B. Rittberger. 2020. “Are Third States Pulling the Strings? The Impact of Domestic Policy Change on EU-Third State Cooperation.” Journal of European Integration 42 (7): 991–1008. doi:10.1080/07036337.2019.1705801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn-Fuhr, I., and S. Worschech. 2014. “Civil Society and Democracy Promotion edited by Beichelt, T., Hahn-Fuhr, I., Schimmelfennig, F., and Worschech, S., 11–41. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Stephen G. F., Tobias Lenz, and A. Obydenkova. 2021. “Environmental Commitments and Rhetoric over the Pandemic Crisis: Social Media and Legitimation of the AIIB, the EAEU, and the EU.” Post-Communist Economies 1–26. doi: 10.1080/14631377.2021.1954824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidbreder, E.G. 2012. “Civil Society Participation in Eu Governance.” Living Reviews in European Governance 7 (2): 1–42. doi:10.12942/lreg-2012-2.
   Google Scholar
• Hilson, C. 2002. “New Social Movements: The Role of Legal Opportunity.” Journal of European Public Policy 9 (2): 238–58. doi:10.1080/13501760110120246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M.M. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imig, D.R., and S.G. Tarrow. 2001. Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Imig, D., and S. Tarrow. 1999. “The Europeanization of Movements? A New Approach to Transnational Contention.” In Social Movements in a Globalizing World, edited by D. Della Porta and H. Kriesi, 112–34. MacMillan Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Izotov, V. S., and A. V. Obydenkova. 2021. “Geopolitical Games in Eurasian Regionalism: Ideational Interactions and Regional International Organisations.” Post-Communist Economies 33 (2–3): 150–74. doi:10.1080/14631377.2020.1793584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson-Nogués, E. 2018. “The EU’s Ontological (In) Security: Stabilising the ENP Area … and the EU-Self?” Cooperation and Conflict 53 (4): 528–44. doi:10.1177/0010836717750197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, H., K. Jacobsson, and S. Saxonberg. 2013. Beyond NGO-Ization: The Development of Social Movements in Central and Eastern Europe. Abingdon: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S.F. 1989. “The Caucasian Mountain Railway Project. A Victory for Glasnost?” Central Asian Survey 8 (2): 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keijzer, N., and F. Bossuyt. 2020. “Partnership on Paper, Pragmatism on the Ground: The European Union’s Engagement with Civil Society Organisations.” Development in Practice 30 (6): 784–94. doi:10.1080/09614524.2020.1801589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. 1986. “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 16 (1): 57–85. doi:10.1017/S000712340000380X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korfiatis, K.J., T. Hovardas, and J.D. Pantis. 2004. “Determinants of Environmental Behavior in Societies in Transition: Evidence from Five European Countries.” Population and Environment 25 (6): 563–84. doi:10.1023/B:POEN.0000039065.31109.1e.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostanyan, H., 2014. The Civil Society Forum of the Eastern Partnership Four Years On: Progress, Challenges and Prospects. CEPS Special Report, January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kostanyan, H., and J. Orbie. 2013. “The EEAs’ Discretionary Power within the Eastern Partnership: In Search of the Highest Possible Denominator.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 13 (1): 47–65. doi:10.1080/14683857.2013.773177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovách, I., and E. Kučerova. 2009. “The Social Context of Project Proliferation—the Rise of a Project Class.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 11 (3): 203–21. doi:10.1080/15239080903033804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasynska, S. 2015. “Contra Spem Spero: The Third Sector’s Resilience in the Face of Political Turbulence and Legislative Change in Ukraine.” Nonprofit Policy Forum 6 (2): 167–86. doi:10.1515/npf-2014-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Kurki, M. 2011. “Democracy through Technocracy? Reflections on Technocratic Assumptions in EU Democracy Promotion Discourse.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 5 (2): 211–37. doi:10.1080/17502977.2011.566482.
   Google Scholar
• Kurze, K., and D. Göler. 2020. “Extending the Logic of Integration beyond EU Borders: External Differentiated Integration in the Case of the Energy Community.” European Foreign Affairs Review 25 (3).
   Google Scholar
• Langbein, J., and K. Wolczuk. 2012. “Convergence without Membership? The Impact of the European Union in the Neighbourhood: Evidence from Ukraine.” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (6): 863–81. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.614133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langbein, J. 2015. Transnationalization and Regulatory Change in the EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood: Ukraine between Brussels and Moscow. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lankina, T. V., A. Libman, and A. Obydenkova. 2016b. “Appropriation and Subversion: Precommunist Literacy, Communist Party Saturation, and Postcommunist Democratic Outcomes.” World Politics 68 (2): 229–74. doi:10.1017/S0043887115000428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankina, T., A. Libman, and A. Obydenkova. 2016a. “Authoritarian and Democratic Diffusion in Post-Communist Regions.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (12): 1599–629. doi:10.1177/0010414016628270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankina, T.V., and A. Libman. 2019. Soviet Legacies of Economic Development, Oligarchic Rule and Electoral Quality in Eastern Europe’s Partial Democracies: The Case of Ukraine 52 (1): 127–148.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S., and F. Schimmelfennig. 2009. “EU Rules beyond EU Borders: Theorizing External Governance in European Politics.” Journal of European Public Policy 16 (6): 791–812. doi:10.1080/13501760903087696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. 2004. “EU External Governance in ‘Wider Europe.’” Journal of European Public Policy 11 (4): 680–700. doi:10.1080/1350176042000248098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Coq, C., and E. Paltseva. 2021. Green Concerns and Salience of Environmental Issues in Eastern Europe. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Libman, A., and A. Obydenkova. 2013. “Informal Governance and Participation in Non-democratic International Organizations.” The Review of International Organizations 8 (2): 221–45. doi:10.1007/s11558-012-9160-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libman, A., and A. Obydenkova. 2014. “Governance of Commons in a Large Nondemocratic Country: The Case of Forestry in the Russian Federation.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 44 (2): 298–323. doi:10.1093/publius/pjt065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libman, A., and A. V. Obydenkova. 2018a. “Understanding Authoritarian Regionalism.” Journal of Democracy 29 (4): 151–65. doi:10.1353/jod.2018.0070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libman, A., and A. V. Obydenkova. 2018b. “Regional International Organizations as a Strategy of Autocracy: The Eurasian Economic Union and Russian Foreign Policy.” International Affairs 94 (5): 1037–58. doi:10.1093/ia/iiy147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luciani, L. 2021. “The EU’s Hegemonic Interventions in the South Caucasus: Constructing ‘Civil’ Society, Depoliticising Human Rights?” Cooperation and Conflict 56 (1): 101–20. doi:10.1177/0010836720954478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniokas, K., L. Delcour, I. Gazizulin, V. Berbeca, I. Muntean, and I. Munteanu. 2019. EU-STRAT Working Paper Series. Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Mazepus, H., A. Dimitrova, M. Frear, T. Chulitskaya, O. Keudel, N. Onopriychuk, and N. Rabava. 2021. “Civil Society and External Actors: How Linkages with the EU and Russia Interact with Socio-Political Orders in Belarus and Ukraine.” East European Politics 37 (1): 43–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., S. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention [ online]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., and M.N. Zald. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (1): 212–41. doi:10.1086/226464.
   Google Scholar
• Minesashvili, S. 2021. “Europe in Georgia’s Identity Discourse: Contestation and the Impact of External Developments.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 54 (1–2): 128–55. doi:10.1525/j.postcomstud.2021.54.1-2.128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mišić, M., and A. Obydenkova. 2021. “Environmental Conflict, Renewable Energy, or Both? Public Opinion on Small Hydropower Plants in Serbia.” Post-Communist Economies 1–30. doi: 10.1080/14631377.2021.1943928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarov, Z, and A. Obydenkova. 2021. Environmental Challenges and Political Regime Transition: The Role of Historical Legacies and the European Union in Eurasi in Problems of Post-Communism. doi:10.1080/10758216.2021.1995437.
   Google Scholar
• Nizhnikau, R. 2015. “Institutional Change in the Eastern Neighbourhood: Environmental Protection and Migration Policy in Ukraine.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 15 (4): 495–517. doi:10.1080/14683857.2015.1050274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nizhnikau, R. 2017. “Promoting Reforms in Moldova.” Problems of Post-Communism 64 (2): 106–20. doi:10.1080/10758216.2016.1219617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nizhnikau, R. 2018. EU Induced Institutional Change in Post-Soviet Space: Promoting Reforms in Moldova and Ukraine. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Obydenkova, A. V. 2012. “Democratization at the Grassroots: The European Union’s External Impact.” Democratization 19 (2): 230–57. doi:10.1080/13510347.2011.576851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obydenkova, Anastassia, Vinícius G. Rodrigues Vieira, and Jale Tosun. 2021. “The Impact of New Actors in Global Environmental Politics: The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Meets China.” Post-Communist Economies 1–21. doi: 10.1080/14631377.2021.1954825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2010. “Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change.” Global Environmental Change 20 (4): 550–57. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., C. M. Tiebout, and R. Warren. 1961. “The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry.” American Political Science Review 55 (4): 831–42. doi:10.1017/S0003055400125973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panchuk, D., F. Bossuyt, and J. Orbie. 2017. “The Substance of EU Democratic Governance Promotion via Transgovernmental Cooperation with the Eastern Neighbourhood.” Democratization 24 (6): 1044–65. doi:10.1080/13510347.2016.1271785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrova, I., and L. Delcour. 2020. “From Principle to Practice? The Resilience–Local Ownership Nexus in the EU Eastern Partnership Policy.” Contemporary Security Policy 41 (2): 336–60. doi:10.1080/13523260.2019.1678280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, N. 2010. EU Foreign Policy and Post-Soviet Conflicts: Stealth Intervention. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Resource and Analysis Centre “Society and Environment,” 2013. “Assessment of the Environmental Component of the EU-Ukraine Bilateral Cooperation.” Accessed 12 January 2021. http://eap-csf.eu/assets/files/Documents/Monito_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rommens, T. 2014. “The Eastern Partnership: Civil Society in between the European and Domestic Level: The Case of Georgia.” East European Politics 30 (1): 54–70. doi:10.1080/21599165.2013.819348.
   Google Scholar
• Rommens, T. 2017. “The Eastern Partnership in Georgia: Europeanizing Civil Society?” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 50 (2): 113–23. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2017.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrama, R., and A. Zhelyazkova. 2018. “‘You Can’t Have One without the Other’: The Differential Impact of Civil Society Strength on the Implementation of Eu Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (7): 1029–48. doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1433709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, T., A. Marchetti, and T. Demmelhuber. 2017. The Routledge Handbook on the European Neighbourhood Policy. Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Selin, H., and S.D. Vandeveer. 2015. “Broader, Deeper and Greener: European Union Environmental Politics, Policies, and Outcomes.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 40 (1): 309–35. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021210.
   Google Scholar
• Shapovalova, N., and R. Youngs. 2014. “The Changing Nature of EU Support to Civil Society.” In Civil Society and Democracy Promotion. 86–109. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Shyrokykh, K., and D. Rimkutė. 2019. “EU Rules beyond Its Borders: The Policy‐Specific Effects of Transgovernmental Networks and EU Agencies in the European Neighbourhood.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (4): 749–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shyrokykh, K. 2021a. “Help Your Neighbor, Help Yourself: The Drivers of European Union’s Climate Cooperation in Trans-governmental Networks with Its Neighbors.” Governance doi: 10.1111/gove.12646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shyrokykh, K. 2021b. “Why Climate? The Drivers of the European Union’s Climate Governance in Its Post-Communist Neighbourhood.” Problems of Post-Communism 1–11. doi: 10.1080/10758216.2021.1974888.
   Google Scholar
• Sil, R., and P.J. Katzenstein. 2010. “Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics: Reconfiguring Problems and Mechanisms across Research Traditions.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (2): 411–31. doi:10.1017/S1537592710001179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, S., and J.M. Dollbaum. 2017. “Civil Society Development in Russia and Ukraine: Diverging Paths.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 50 (3): 207–20. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2017.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torney, D., C. Adelle, and K. Biedenkopf, eds. 2018. European Union External Environmental Policy: Rules, Regulation and Governance beyond Borders. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Adán, Á. 2021. “Still Winners and Losers? Studying Public Opinion’s Geopolitical Preferences in the Association Agreement Countries (Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine).” Post-Soviet Affairs 37 (4): 362–82. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2021.1924041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuladze, L., N. Macharashvili, and K. Pachulia. 2018. “SOS Tbilisi: Challenges to Environmental Civic Participation in Georgia.” Problems of Post-Communism 65 (5): 327–43. doi:10.1080/10758216.2017.1308228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkina, E., and E. Postnikov. 2014. “From Business to Politics.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (5): 1120–41. doi:10.1111/jcms.12138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udovyk, O. 2017. “Beyond the Conflict and Weak Civil Society; Stories from Ukraine: Cases of Grassroots Initiatives for Sustainable Development.” East/West: Journal of Ukrainian Studies 4 (2): 187–210. doi:10.21226/T27W6R.
   Google Scholar
• Wolczuk, K. 2009. “Implementation without Coordination: The Impact of EU Conditionality on Ukraine under the European Neighbourhood Policy.” Europe-Asia Studies 61 (2): 187–211. doi:10.1080/09668130802630839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolczuk, K. 2016. “Managing the Flows of Gas and Rules: Ukraine between the EU and Russia.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 57 (1): 113–37. doi:10.1080/15387216.2016.1174072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woll, C., and S. Jacquot. 2010. “Using Europe: Strategic Action in Multi-Level Politics.” Comparative European Politics 8 (1): 110–26. doi:10.1057/cep.2010.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunsch, N. 2015. “Beyond Instrumentalisation: NGO Monitoring Coalitions in Croatia, Montenegro, and Serbia.” East European Politics 31 (4): 452–67. doi:10.1080/21599165.2015.1085859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar