143
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Evading Transparency, Doubting Democracy, Dreaming Big: Grassroots Perspectives on Science Governance in Russia

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Allakhverdian, A. 2019. “Reforma RAN, Argumenty vlasti i nedostovernaia statistika nauchnykh kadrov” [The Reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Arguments of the Authorities and the Unreliable Statistics of the Academic Personnel]. Naukovedcheskie issledovaniia 17:39–46.
  • Allen-Collinson, J. 2000. “Social Science Contract Researchers in Higher Education: Perceptions of Craft Knowledge.” Work, Employment & Society 14 (1):159–71. doi:10.1177/09500170022118310.
  • Archer, L. 2008. “The Neoliberal Subjects? Younger Academics’ Constructions of Professional Identity.” Journal of Education Policy 23 (3):265–85. doi:10.1080/02680930701754047.
  • Baker, R., J. Brick, N A. Bates, M. Battaglia, M. Couper, J. Dever, K.J. Gile, and R. Tourangeau. 2013. “Summary Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-probability Sampling.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 1 (2):90–143. doi:10.1093/jssam/smt008.
  • Bennett, J. B. 1998. Collegial Professionalism: The Academy, Individualism and the Common Good. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education and the Oryx Press.
  • Bolden, R., G. Petrov, and J. Gosling. 2009. “Distributed Leadership in Higher Education: Rhetoric and Reality.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 37 (2):257–77. doi:10.1177/1742715009337762.
  • Bollen, J., D. Crandall, D. Junk, Y. Ding, and K. Börner. 2017. “An Efficient System to Fund Science: From Proposal Review to Peer-to-peer Distributions.” Scientometrics 110 (1):521–28. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2110-3.
  • Borkin, L. 2018. Nauchnoe soobshchestvo: Voprosy sotsiologa [Academic Community: A Sociologist’s Questions] (May 22, 2018). Accessed May 20, 2021. trv-science.ru
  • Bourdieu, P. 1997. Les Usages Sociaux de la Science. Pour Une Sociologie Clinique du Champ Scientifique [Social Uses of Science: For the Clinical Sociology of the Scientific Field]. Paris: Éd. INRA.
  • Bravo, G., F. Grimaldo, E. López-Iñesta, B. Mehmani, and F. Squazzoni. 2019. “The Effect of Publishing Peer Review Reports on Referee Behavior in Five Scholarly Journals.” Nature Communications 10 (1). doi:10.1038/s41467-018-08250-2.
  • Chawla, D. S. 2019. Thousands of Grant Peer Reviewers Share Concerns in Global Survey (10/15/2019), at nature.com, accessed May 20, 2021.
  • Chawla, D. S. 2020. “Russian Academy Probe Triggers More than 800 Retractions.” Science 367 (6474):132. doi:10.1126/science.367.6474.132.
  • Clarke, C., D. Knights, and C. Jarvis. 2012. “A Labour of Love? Academics in Business Schools.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 28 (1):5–15. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2011.12.003.
  • Dezhina, I. 2019. Science and Innovations in Russia in 2018. Political Economy - Development: Domestic Development Strategies eJournal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3449220.
  • Dvornikova, T. 2016 Cuts, Cuts, Cuts: The Life and Times of Russia’s University Teachers (February 9, 2016). Accessed May 20, 2021. atopendemocracy.net
  • Ekins, S., and A. Williams. 2010. “Reaching Out to Collaborators: Crowdsourcing for Pharmaceutical Research.” Pharmaceutical Research 27 (3):393–95. doi:10.1007/s11095-010-0059-0.
  • Faulconbridge, J., and D. Muzio. 2008. “Organizational Professionalism in Globalizing Law Firms.” Work, Employment and Society 22 (1):7–25. doi:10.1177/0950017007087413.
  • Forum. 2019. “Forum: Prikladnaia naukometriia” [Forum: Applied Scientometrics]. Antropologicheskii forum 40:11–84. doi:10.31250/1815-8870-2019-15-40-11-84.
  • Fried, J. 2006. “Higher Education Governance in Europe: Autonomy, Ownership, and Accountability — A Review of the Literature.” In Higher Education Governance between Democratic Culture, Academic Aspirations and Market Forces, edited by J. Kohler and J. Huber, 79–133. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  • Gokhberg, L., E. Ditkovskii, Y. Evnevich, I. A. Kuznetsova, S. V. Martynova, A. I. Nefedova, V. V. Polyakova, T. V. Ratay, L. A. Rosovetskaya, V. A. Rud, G. S. Sagieva, E. A. Streltsova, A. B. Suslov, I. I. Tarasenko, S. Y. Fridlyanova, and K. S. Fursov. 2021. Nauka. Tekhnologii. innovatsii: 2021: Kratkii statisticheskii sbornik [Science. Technologies. Innovations: 2021: A Short Statistical Handbook]. Moscow: NIU VShE. doi:10.17323/978-5-7598-2353-7.
  • Gokhberg, L., O. Ozerova, E. Sautina, and N. Shugal. 2020. Obrazovanie v tsifrakh: 2020: Kratkii statisticheskii sbornik [Education in Figures: A Short Statistical Handbook]. Moscow: NIU VShE. doi:10.17323/978-5-7598-2306-3.
  • Government of the Russian Federation. 2022. Postanovlenie pravitelʹstva Rossiĭskoĭ Federatsii ot 19.03.2022 № 414 “O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniia trebovaniĭ i tselevykh znacheniĭ pokazateleĭ, sviazannykh s publikatsionnoĭ aktivnostʹiu” [Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 414 of 19 March 2022 “On Certain Issues of Application of Requirements and Target Values of Indicators Related to Publication Activity”]. Accessed March 31, 2022. http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202203210040.
  • Government of the Russian Federation n.d. “The Results of the VIII Megagrant Competition: The List of Megagrant Winners,” Resolution No. 220. Accessed May 20, 2021. atp220.ru/en/
  • Graham, L. R. 1993. Science in Russia and the Soviet Union: A Short History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Greenbaum, T. L. 2000. Moderating Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Group Facilitation. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781483328522.
  • Heath, M., and P.C. Burdon. 2013. “Academic Resistance to the Neoliberal University.” Legal Education Review 23:379.
  • Indicators. n.d. Information System for Analyzing the Dynamics of Indicators in the Sphere of Higher and Secondary Vocational Education. Accessed May 20, 2021. atindicators.miccedu.ru/indicators
  • Ivancheva, M. 2015. “The Age of Precarity and the New Challenges to the Academic Profession.” Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Studia Europaea 60 (1):39–48.
  • Kabatskov, A., and O. Leibovich. 2016. “‘Po dukhu vremeni i vkusu …’: Dotsent kak nevolʹnik” [“By Zeitgeist and by Taste …” : The Associate Professor as Slave]. Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie 6:325–48.
  • Kalfa, S., A. Wilkinson, and P. J. Gollan. 2018. “The Academic Game: Compliance and Resistance in Universities.” Work, Employment and Society 32 (2):274–91. doi:10.1177/0950017017695043.
  • Kallio, K. M., T.J. Kallio, J. Tienari, and T. Hyvonen. 2016. “Ethos at Stake: Performance Management and Academic Work in Universities.” Work, Employment and Society 69 (3):685–709. doi:10.1177/0018726715596802.
  • Kosmarski, A. 2009. “Space, Power, and Prestige in the Academic Field.” Focaal (53): 89–102. doi:10.3167/fcl.2009.530106.
  • Kosmarski, A. 2020. “Blockchain Adoption in Academia: Promises and Challenges.” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 6 (4):117. doi:10.3390/joitmc6040117.
  • Kosmarski, A., and N. Gordiychuk. 2020. “Token-curated Registry in a Scholarly Journal: Can Blockchain Support Journal Communities?” Learned Publishing 33 (3):333–39. doi:10.1002/leap.1302.
  • Krause-Jensen, J., and C. Garsten. 2014. “Introduction: Neoliberal Turns in Higher Education.” Learning and Teaching: The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences 7 (3):1–13. doi:10.3167/latiss.2014.070301.
  • Krueger, R. A. 1998. Moderating Focus Groups. vol. 4. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781483328133.n4.
  • Kuleshova, A., and D. Podvoiskii. 2018. “Paradoksy publikatsionnoi aktivnosti v pole sovremennoi rossiiskoi nauki: Genezis, diagnoz, trendy” [The Paradoxes of Publication Activity in the Field of Contemporary Russian Science: Genesis, Diagnosis, Trends]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny 4:169–210. doi:10.14515/monitoring.2018.4.10.
  • Kuzminov, Y., D. Semenov, and I. Frumin. 2013. “Struktura vuzovskoi seti: Ot sovetskogo k rossiiskomu ‘master-planu’” [The Structure of the University Network: From the Soviet Toward Russian “Master Plan”]. Voprosy obrazovaniia 4:008–063. doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2013-4-8-69.
  • Kuzminov, Ya., and M. Yudkevich. 2021. Universitety v Rossii: Kak eto rabotaet [Universities in Russia: How It Works]. Moscow: Izdatelskii dom VShE.
  • Lamont, M. 2009. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Leathwood, C., and B. Read. 2013. “Research Policy and Academic Performativity: Compliance, Contestation and Complicity.” Studies in Higher Education 38 (8):1162–74. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.833025.
  • Lee, Molly N.N. 2008. “Restructuring Higher Education: Public–Private Partnership.” Journal of Asian Public Policy 1 (2):188–98. doi:10.1080/17516230802094494.
  • Leible, S., S. Schlager, M. Schubotz, and B. Gipp. 2019. “A Review on Blockchain Technology and Blockchain Projects Fostering Open Science.” Frontiers in Blockchain 2:16. doi:10.3389/fbloc.2019.00016.
  • Xu Liu. 2017. “The Governance in the Development of Public Universities in China.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 39 (3):266–81. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2017.1300122.
  • Lyall, C., and J. Tait. 2019. “Beyond the Limits to Governance: New Rules of Engagement for the Tentative Governance of the Life Sciences.” Research Policy 48 (5):1128–37. doi:10.1016/J.RESPOL.2019.01.009.
  • Macfarlane, B. 2005. “The Disengaged Academic: The Retreat from Citizenship.” Higher Education Quarterly 59 (4):296–312. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2005.00299.x.
  • Mandel, D. 2020. “Corruption in Russian Higher Education.” Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 28 (1):77–84. doi:10.1080/25739638.2020.1812935.
  • Marcus, A. 2019. Exclusive: Russian Site Says It Has Brokered Authorships for More Than 10,000 researchers. (July 18, 2019). Accessed May 20, 2021. atretractionwatch.com
  • Matveeva, N., I. Sterligov, and M. Yudkevich. 2021. “The Effect of Russian University Excellence Initiative on Publications and Collaboration Patterns.” Journal of Informetrics 15 (1):101110. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101110.
  • McNay, I. 1995. “From the Collegial Academy to Corporate Enterprise: The Changing Cultures of Universities.” In The Changing University?, edited by T. Schuller, 105–15. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
  • Merton, R. K. 1973. Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mervis, J. 2017. Data Check: U.S. Government Share of Basic Research Funding Falls below 50% (September 03, 2017). Accessed May 20, 2021, Science. doi:10.1126/science.aal0890.
  • Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
  • Muller, J. Z. 2018. The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Narkhov, A. 2014. “Politicheskii resurs rossiiskikh prepodavatelei vysshei shkoly: Formy i sposoby realizatsii” [The Political Resource of Russian Higher Education Teachers: Forms and Methods of Implementation]. Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta 2 (29):129–36.
  • Newman, J., M. Barnes, H. Sullivan, and A. Knops. 2004. “Public Participation and Collaborative Governance.” Journal of Social Policy 33 (2):203–23. doi:10.1017/S0047279403007499.
  • Olsson, P., L. H. Gunderson, S. R. Carpenter, P. Ryan, L. Lebel, C. Folke, and C. S. Holling. 2006. “Shooting the Rapids: Navigating Transitions to Adaptive Governance of Social-ecological Systems.” Ecology and Society 11 (1):18. doi:10.5751/ES-01595-110118.
  • Panova, A. 2017. “Mekhanizmy priniatiia resheniĭ v universitete” [Mechanisms of Decision-making in Universities]. Ekonomicheskaia politika 12 (2):132–51.
  • Pateman, C. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Peters, B. G. 2014. “Is Governance for Everybody?” Policy and Society 33 (4):301–06. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.10.005.
  • Peters, M. A. 2019. “Global University Rankings: Metrics, Performance, Governance.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (1):5–13. doi:10.1080/00131857.2017.1381472.
  • Plerou, V., L. A. Nunes Amaral, P. Gopikrishnan, M. Meyer, and H. G. Stanley. 1999. “Similarities between the Growth Dynamics of University Research and of Competitive Economic Activities.” Nature 400:433–37. doi: 10.1038/22719
  • Polletta, F. 2016. “Participatory Enthusiasms: A Recent History of Citizen Engagement Initiatives.” Journal of Civil Society 12 (3):231–46. doi:10.1080/17448689.2016.1213505.
  • Prakhov, I. 2019. “The Determinants of Academic Salaries in Russia.” Higher Education 77 (5):777–97. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0301-y.
  • Ramirez, F.O. 2010. “Accounting for Excellence: Transforming Universities into Organizational Actors.” In Higher Education, Policy, and the Global Competition Phenomenon. International and Development Education, edited by L.M. Portnoi, V.D. Rust, and S.S Bagley, 54–75. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230106130_4.
  • Rosstat. 2019. Federalʹnaia sluzhba gosudarstvennoĭ statistiki: Nauka i innovatsii [Federal Agency of Public Statistics: Science and Innovations]. Accessed May 20, 2021. https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/14477?print=1.
  • Rostovtsev, A. 2017. Plagiarism in the Dissertations and Scientific Publications in Russia. In Plagiarism Across Europe and Beyond – Conference Proceedings (pp. 107–12). Brno: Mendel University.
  • Rowlands, J. 2015. “Turning Collegial Governance on Its Head: Symbolic Violence, Hegemony and the Academic Board.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 36 (7):1017–35. doi:10.1080/01425692.2014.883916.
  • Sabel, C., and J. Zeitlin. 2010. Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Saltanova, S. 2021. Nauka Rossii v 10 tsifrakh. Kak izmenilasʹ otechestvennaia akademiia v XXI veke? [Russian Science in 10 Figures. How Has the Domestic Academy Changed in the Twenty-first Century?]. (August 2, 2021). Accessed May 20, 2021. atiq.hse.ru
  • Schaap, A. 2007. “Political Theory and the Agony of Politics.” Political Studies Review 5 (1):56–74. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9299.2007.00123.x.
  • Schiermeier, Q. 2020. “Russia Aims to Revive Science after Era of Stagnation.” Nature 579:332–36. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-00753-7.
  • Schwartz, S. J. 1980. “Governance: Another View.” Labor Law Journal 31 (10):645–50.
  • Scott, J. S. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. Yale: Yale University Press.
  • Shaw, M. A. 2019. “Public Accountability versus Academic Independence: Tensions of Public Higher Education Governance in Poland.” Studies in Higher Education 44 (12):12, 2235–2248. doi:10.1080/03075079.2018.1483910.
  • Shibanova, E.Yu., D. P. Platonova, and M.A. Lisyutkin. 2018. “The 5–100 Project University Development Trends and Patterns.” Russian Education & Society 60 (8–9):8–715. doi:10.1080/10609393.2018.1598164.
  • Shore, C. 2008. “Audit Culture and Illiberal Governance: Universities and the Politics of Accountability.” Anthropological Theory 8 (3):278–98. doi:10.1177/1463499608093815.
  • Shtern, B. 2013. “Klub ‘1 iiulia’” [The “1st of July” Club] (July 16, 2013). Accessed February 27, 2022. trv-science.ru
  • Sokolov, M. 2018. “‘Universitety stali gibridom patriarkhalʹnykh demokratii s predprinimatelʹskimi avtokratiiami.’ Sotsiolog Mikhail Sokolov o tom, kak ustroena vlastʹ v rossiĭskikh vuzakh” [“Universities Have Turned into a Hybrid between Patriarchal Democracies and Entrepreneurial Autocracies”: Sociologist Mikhail Sokolov on How Russian Universities Are Governed] (September 25, 2018). Accessed May 20 2021. indicator.ru
  • Spence, C. 2019. “‘Judgement’ versus ‘Metrics’ in Higher Education Management.” Higher Education 77 (5):761–75. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0300-z.
  • Stepanov, B. 2001. “Piknik na obochine: Opyt kharakteristiki regionalnoi intellektualnoi sredy” [A Sidewalk Picnic: An Essay on the Regional Intellectual Environment]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie 4:168–184.
  • Stewart, D. W., and P. N. Shamdasani. 2015. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
  • Stone, R. 2022. Western Nations Cut Ties with Russian Science, Even as Some Projects Try to Remain Neutral (August 3, 2022). Accessed March 31, 2022. atscience.org
  • Taylor, M. 2013. “Shared Governance in the Modern University.” Higher Education Quarterly 67 (1):80–94. doi:10.1111/hequ.12003.
  • Thivet, D. 2008. “Thomas Hobbes: A Philosopher of War or Peace?” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (4):701–21. doi:10.1080/09608780802407407.
  • Varshavskii, Leonid. 2000. “Chislennost i struktura nauchnykh kadrov strany: Vzgliad v budushchee” [The Size and Structure of Academic Cadre Personnel in the Country: A Look into the Future]. Naukovedenie 1:22–47.
  • Voss, J.-P., D. Bauknecht, and R. Kemp, eds. 2006. Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development. Cheltenham: Elgar
  • Weiss, T G. 2000. “Governance, Good Governance and Global Governance: Conceptual and Actual Challenges.” Third World Quarterly 21 (5):795–814. doi:10.1080/713701075.
  • Yudin, G. 2020. Grigoriĭ Iudin: “Govoritʹ, chto v Amerike estʹ realʹnaia demokratiia, mozhno tolʹko iz detskogo zhelaniia naĭti obrazets ‘vzroslogo’” [Grigorii Yudin: “To Say That There Is Real Democracy in America Is Possible Only Out of Childish Desire to Find a ‘Grown-up’”]. (October 11, 2020). Accessed May 20, 2021. doi:10.18087/cardio.2021.4.n1596
  • Yurevich, A. 1997. Umnye, no bednye: Uchenye v postsovetskoi Rossii [Smart but Poor: Scientists in post-Soviet Russia]. Moscow: MONF.
  • Zaiavlenie, ONR. 2020. “‘Nauchnykh fondov v Rossii dolzhno bytʹ mnogo’: Zaiavlenie Soveta ONR o prisoedinenii RFFI k RNF” [“There Should be Many Scientific Foundations in Russia”: The Statement of the ONR Council on the Accession of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research to the Russian Science Foundation] (November 26, 2020). Accessed February 27, 2022. attrv–science.ru

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.