Field comparison of two inhalable samplers used in Italy to measure the wood dust exposure

References

• Council Directive 1999/38/EC of 29 April 1999 amending for the second time Directive 90/394/EEC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens at work and extending it to mutagens. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:31999L0038
   Google Scholar
• Decree law of government n° 66, 25 February 2000 Implementation of the directives 97/42/CE and 1999/38/CE, that modify directive 90/394/CEE, on the subject of the protection of workers against the risks stemming from exposure to cancerous or mutating agents during work. Available from: http://www.nonsoloaria.com/Leggi%20aria/DL66.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine (IOM): A review of monitoring methods for inhalable hardwood dust. IOM Research Project: P937/1A, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• European Standard UNI EN-481, Workplace atmospheres – Size fraction definitions for measurement of airborne particles, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent JH, Armbruster L. On the quantitative definition of the inhalability of airborne dust. Ann Occup Hyg. 1981;24:245–248.10.1093/annhyg/24.2.245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden G, Kenny LC. Errors in inhalable dust sampling for particles exceeding 100 μm. Ann Occup Hyg. 1994;38:373–384.10.1093/annhyg/38.4.373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny LC, Aitken RJ, Chalmers C, Fabries JF, Gonzalez-Fernandez E, Kromhout H, et al. A collaborative European study of personal inhalable aerosol sampler performance. Ann Occup Hyg. 1997;41:135–153.10.1093/annhyg/41.2.135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny LC, Aitken RJ, Baldwin PEJ, Beaumont GC, Maynard AD. The sampling efficiency of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in low air movement environments. J Aerosol Sci. 1999;30:627–638.10.1016/S0021-8502(98)00752-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aizenberg V, Choe K, Grinshpun SA, Willeke K, Baron PA. Evaluation of personal aerosol samplers challenged with large particles. J Aerosol Sci. 2001;32:779–793.10.1016/S0021-8502(00)00119-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe A. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust. Ann Occup Hyg. 2007;51(1):97–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campopiano A, Ramires D, Spagnoli G, Arcaro F, Bosco MG, Pandolfi P, et al. Primi risultati del confronto tra due selettori utilizzati per la captazione di polveri di legno [Comparison between two wood dust samplers, preliminary findings]. Giornale degli Igienisti Industriali. 2006;31:86–97.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny LC. Developments in workplace aerosol sampling – a review. Analyst. 1996;121(9):1233–1239.10.1039/an9962101233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee T, Harper M, Slaven JE, Lee K, Rando RJ, Maples EH. Wood dust sampling: field evaluation of personal samplers when large particles are present. Ann Occup. Hyg. 2011;55:180–191.10.1093/annhyg/meq075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper H, Muller BS, Bartolucci AL. Determining particle size distributions in the inhalable size range for wood dust collected by air samplers. J Environ Monit. 2002;4:642–647.10.1039/B202856P
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): Manual of Analytical Methods, 4rd ed., Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated, Total: Method 0500, Issue 2, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Lee CT, Leith D. Drag force on agglomerated spheres in creeping flow. J Aerosol Sci. 1989;20:503–513.10.1016/0021-8502(89)90097-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhonson DL, Leith D, Reist CP. Drag on non-spheres in creeping flow. J Aerosol Sci. 1987;20:503–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marconi A. Campionamento delle frazioni dimensionali di rilevanza sanitaria per le polveri di legno [Sampling of size fractions for wood dust]. Giornale degli Igienisti Industriali. 2002;27:110–121.
   Google Scholar
• Belosi F, Prodi F, Santachiara G. Real time wood dust sampling with particle size classification. European Aerosol Conference, Salzburg, Abstract T17A005, 2007. Available from: http://www.gaef.de/eac2007/eac2007abstracts/T17Abstractpdf/T17A005.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harper M, Zabed Akbar M, Andrew ME. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distribution collected by air samplers. J Environ Monit. 2004;6:18–22.10.1039/b312883k
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Health and Safety Executive (HSE): Large particle and wall deposition effects in inhalable samplers, by R.J. Aitken, R. Donaldson. (HSE Contract Research Report No.117/1996). Sudbury, Suffolk, UK: Health and Safety Executive Books, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr SM, Muranko HJ, Vincent JH. Personal sampling for inhalable aerosol exposures of carbon black manufacturing industry workers. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2002;17:681–692.10.1080/10473220290096177
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demange M, Görner P, Elcabache JM, Wrobel R. Field comparison of 37-mm closed-face cassettes and IOM samplers. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2002;17:200–208.10.1080/104732202753438289
   PubMedGoogle Scholar