The Validity of Using a Content-Specific Reading Comprehension Test for College Placement

References

• Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1994). Learning from physics text: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 895–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College Testing Program. (1990). ASSET technical manual for use with Forms B and C. Iowa City, IO: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C. (1984). Role of the reader's schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osborn, & R. J. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts (pp. 243–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, W. B. (1994). English placement testing, multiple measures, and disproportionate impact: An analysis of the criterion- and content-related validity evidence the reading & writing placement tests in the San Diego Community College District. San Diego, CA: San Diego Community College District, Research and Planning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 398965).
   Google Scholar
• Behrman, E. H. (2000). Developmental placement decisions: Content-specific reading assessment. Journal of Developmental Education, 23(3), 12–14, 16, 18.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. I., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. (1993). Nelson-Denny Reading Test: Manual for scoring and interpretation, Forms G & H. Chicago: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J. P. (1995). Domain specificity and the logic of using general ability as an independent variable or covariate. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 41, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capon, J. A. (1988). Elementary statistics for the social sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• College of the Canyons. (1994). Predictive validity study of the APS Reading Test. Santa Clarita, CA: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 374853).
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. M. (1999). The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: The case of research on prior knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69, 145–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldt, R. C. (1989). Reading comprehension and critical thinking as predictors of course performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, V. C., & Edmondson, B. (1992). Relative importance of aptitude and prior domain knowledge on immediate and delayed posttests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 219–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. (1984). Prior knowledge and reading comprehension test bias. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 219–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing of the American Educational Research Association, the American Psychological Association, and the National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kerlinger, F. N., & Pedhazur, E. J. (1973). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, R. P. (1987). Can reading placement scores predict classroom performance? A discriminant analysis. Santa Ana, CA: Rancho Santiago Community College District. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 291440).
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1986). Learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 87–108.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 294–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. & vanDijk, T. A. (1978). Towards a model of discourse comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. E., McElrath, C. B., Burton, M. S., James, B. D., Doyle, R. P., Woodward, S. L., et al. (1991). Hypothetico-deductive reasoning skill and concept acquisition: Testing a constructivist hypothesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 953–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannes, S., & Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 91–115.
   Google Scholar
• Marieb, E. N., & Mallat, J. (2003). Human anatomy (3rd ed. update). San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. M., & the staff of the Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of the reading process as a basis for comprehension instruction. In G. G. Duffy, L. R. Roehler, & J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions (pp. 26–38). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, J. E., & Kintsch, W. (1993). Writing quality, reading skills, and domain knowledge as factors in text comprehension. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 360–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Parsad, B., & Lewis, L. (2003). Remedial education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in Fall 2000. Statistical analysis report. (NCES Publication No. 2040-010). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Royer, J. M., Carlo, M. S., Dufresne, R., & Mestre, J. (1996). The assessment of levels of domain expertise while reading. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 373–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). Schemata: The building blocks of learning. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 3–26). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. (1989). Validating the use of ACT Assessment scores and high school grades for remedial course placement in college. (Research Report No. 89-4). Iowa City, IO: American College Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. (1996). Decision theory models for validating course placement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33, 271–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999). Looking toward the 21st Century: Challenge of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A. M. (2004). How including prior knowledge as a subject variable may change outcomes of learning research. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 159–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimoda, T. A. (1993). The effects of interesting examples and topic familiarity on text comprehension, attention, and reading speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., Hare, V. C., Sinatra, R., & Gregory, J. F. (1991). Defining the role of prior knowledge and vocabulary in reading comprehension: The retiring of Number 41. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23, 487–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, J. F., & Silfies, L.N. (1996). Learning from history text: The interaction of knowledge and comprehension skill with text structure. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 45–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. T., & Anderson, R. C. (1986). What they don't know will hurt them: The role of prior knowledge in comprehension. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), Reading comprehension: From research to practice (pp. 31–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitz, C. M. (1994). Expert-novice differences in memory, abstraction, and reasoning in the domain of literature. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 277–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar