Using WebCT as a Supplemental Tool to Enhance Critical Thinking and Engagement among Developmental Reading Students

References

• Ackley, K. (2001). Essays from contemporary culture (4th ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle/Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Beeghly, D. (2005). It's about time: Using electronic literature discussion groups with adult learners [Electronic version]. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(1), 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 361–392). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Boylan, H. (2002). What Works: Research-Based Practices in Developmental Education. Boone, NC: Continuous Quality Improvement Network/National Center for Developmental Education, Appalachian State University.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, M. L. (2006). [Journal entry in developmental studies classroom]. Unpublished raw data.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, M. L. (2007). [Journal entry in developmental studies classroom]. Unpublished raw data.
   Google Scholar
• Caverly, D. C., Nicholson, S. A., & Radcliffe, R. (2004). The effectiveness of strategic reading instruction for college developmental readers. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 35(1), 25–46.
   Google Scholar
• Caverly, D. C., & Peterson, C. (2005). Techtalk: Building academic literacy through online discussion forums [Electronic version]. Journal of Developmental Education, 29(2), 38–39.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, R., & Donaldson, J. (2004). Engaging the online learner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, S. R., Friesner, D., & Khayum, M. (2003). Do reading skills courses help underprepared readers achieve academic success in college? Journal of College Reading and Learning, 33(2), 170–196.
   Google Scholar
• D'Eca, T. (2003). The Use of Chat in EFL/ESL. Retrieved January 3, 2007 from Berkeley University, TESL-EJ: Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language Web site: www.writing.berkeley.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Eble, K. (1994). Craft of teaching: A guide to mastering the professor's art (2nd edition), New York: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2004). Critical thinking…and the art of close reading, part IV. Journal of Developmental Education, 28(2), pp. 36–37.
   Google Scholar
• Flippo, R. F. (2001). Reading researchers in search of common ground. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, E., Pickett, A., & Shea, P. (2000). Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses: Principles and examples from the SUNY Learning Network [Electronic version]. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2).
   Google Scholar
• Fry, V., & Ecung, A. (1998). Views and processes for integrating reading and writing for successful developmental practice. [Electronic version]. Retrieved December 11, 2007, from http://www.nade.net/documents/Mono98/mono98.4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrell, L. (2006). Technology and the engaged literacy learner. In M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, R. D. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology (pp. 289–294). Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Introduction to Hybrid Courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(10). Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Hasselbring, T. S., Lott, A. C., & Zydney, J. M. (2004). A review of technology-based approaches for reading instruction. [Electronic version]. Tools for researchers and vendors. Washington DC: American Institutes for Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1992). Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., Killion, J., & Oomen, J. (2005). Student satisfaction in the virtual classroom. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 3. Retrieved January 26, 2006, from http://ijahsp.nova.edu/articles/vol3num2/Johnston%20-%20Printer%20Version.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Krech, P. (2001). Developing writers using technology. 2001: A Developmental Odyssey. (Monograph) Warrensburg, MO: NADE.
   Google Scholar
• Lavin, D., & Hyllegard, D. (1996). Changing the odds: Open admissions and the life changes of the disadvantaged [Electronic version]. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. (2007). Online collaborative case study learning. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(2), 82–100.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L., & Commack, D. W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrou (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes in Reading (pp. 1570–1607). Newark DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ley, K., & Young, D. B. (1998). Motivation in developmental and regular admission college students. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 14(2), 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey-North, J. L. (2000). Incorporating a course website into teaching: A promising practice especially for teacher education. (Report no. SP039547). Place of pub.: Wright State University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED447077).
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, B. R., & Young, D. B. (1992). Designing motivational instruction for developmental education. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 9(1), 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Martyn, M. (2003). The hybrid online model. Good practice [Electronic version]. Educause Quarterly, 1, 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, R. H., & Day, P. R., Jr. (1998). Developmental education: A twenty-first century social and economic imperative. Mission Viejo, CA: League for Innovation in the Community College, The College Board.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. (2007). Academic motivation and performance of developmental education biology students. Journal of Developmental Education, 31(1), 24–34.
   Google Scholar
• NADE. (2007). Definition of developmental education. Retrieved January 31, 2008, from http://www.nade.net.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Educational Statistics (NCDE). (2003). Remedial education at higher institutions in fall 2000 (Report No. NCES 97–584). Washington D.C.: NCDE.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daniel, L. G. (2002). Uses and misuses of the correlation coefficient. Research in the Schools, 9(1), 73–90.
   Google Scholar
• Osterman, P. P. (2005). A comparison of student performance in developmental reading using traditional versus a hybrid model of traditional and online instruction. Research in Developmental Education, 19(2), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Pallof, R., & Pratt, K. (2003). The virtual student: A profile and guide to working with online learners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Perin, D. (2005). Institutional decision making for increasing academic preparedness in community colleges. New Direction for Community Colleges, 129, 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, C., & Murphy, E. (2006). Identifying and measuring individual engagement in critical thinking in online discussions: An exploratory case study. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 298–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrides, L., Kerglani, A., & Nguyen, L. (2006). Basic Online Education Literature. League for the Innovation in Community College. Retrieved on December 12, 2007, from http://www.league.org/league/projects/beo/files/Literature_Review.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1994). Self-Regulated learning in college students: Knowledge, strategies and motivation. In P. R. Pintrich & D. R. Brown (Eds.), Student motivation, cognition and learning: Essays in honor of Wilbur J. McKeachie (pp.113–133). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Quitadamo, I. J., & Brown, A. (2001). Effective teaching styles and instructional design for online learning environments. National Educational Computing Conference Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. (1990). Communication in the classroom [Electronic version]. Communication Education, 39, 183–196.
   Google Scholar
• Roberson, T., & Klotz, J. (2001, November). Chat: The missing link in on-line instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Little Rock, AR.
   Google Scholar
• Saxon, D., & Boylan, H. (2004). Characteristics of Community College Remedial Students. From http://www.ncde.appstate.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (2004, Month day). Defining critical thinking. Retrieved January 26, 2006, from http://www.criticalthinking.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G., Ferguson, D., & Caris, M. (2001). Teaching college courses online vs. face-to-face. THE Journal, 28(9), 18–26.
   Google Scholar
• Testa, A. (2000). Seven principles for good practice in teaching and technology. In R. A. Cole (Ed.), Issues in Web-Based pedagogy (pp. 238–243). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Texas State Data Center and Office of the State Demographer. (2008, June 19). Texas population estimates program., San Antonio, TX: Texas State Data Center and Office of the State Demographer, Institute for Demographic and Socioeconomic Research, the University of Texas at San Antonio. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://txsdc.utsa.edu/tpepp/txpopest.php.
   Google Scholar
• Tu, C. H., & Corry, M. (2003). Designs, management tactics, and strategies in asynchronous learning discussions [Electronic version]. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 303–315.
   Google Scholar
• Wadsworth, L. (2007). Online mathematics achievement: Effects of learning strategies and self-efficacy. Journal of Developmental Education, 30(3), 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005, Month). Understanding by design 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar