Factors Affecting the Comprehension of Global and Local Main Idea

References

• Afflerbach, P. P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers' main idea construction strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 31–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulls, M. W. (1978). Developmental and remedial reading in the middle grades. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Beishuizen, J., Asscher, J., Prinsen, F., & Elshout-Mohr, M. (2003). Presence and place of main ideas and examples in study texts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 291–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beishuizen, J., Stoutjesdijk, E., Spuijbroek, S., Bouwmeester, S., & van der Geest, H. (2002). Understanding abstract expository texts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 279–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broek, P. V. D., Lynch, J. S., Naslund, J., Ievers-Landis, C. E., & Verduin, K. (2003). The development of comprehension of main ideas in narratives: Evidence from the selection of titles. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 707–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cash, M. M., Schumm, J. S., & Schumm, J. S. (2006). Making sense of knowledge: Comprehending expository text. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davey, B., & Miller, D. (1990). Topicalization and the processing of expository prose by children: Mediating effects of cognitive styles and content familiarity. Educational Psychology, 10, 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Day, J. D., & Zajakowski, A. (1991). Comparisons of learning ease and transfer propensity in poor and average readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, L. G., & Pearson, P. D. (1994). Reading comprehension: What works. Educational Leadership, 51, 62–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., Saul, E., & Cote, N. (1995). Paragraphing, reader, and task effects on discourse comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20, 273–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Pomeroy, V. J., & Craig, S. D. (2002). Psychological and computational research on theme comprehension. In M. Louwerse & W. van Peer (Eds.), Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies. (pp. 19–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, A. W. (1986). Effects of direct instruction and metacomprehension training on finding main ideas. Learning Disabilities Research, 1, 90–100.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, V. C., Rabinowitz, M., & Schieble, K. M. (1989). Text effects on main idea comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 72–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 414–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A. K., Cole, C. L., Hoppes, M. K., & Wilson, B. (1998). Effects of a direct instruction main idea summarization program and self-monitoring on reading comprehension of middle school students with learning disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14, 379–396.
   Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A. K., Hoppes, M. K., & Xin, Y. P. (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems: The role of a summarization strategy and self-monitoring instruction. Journal of Special Education, 34, 127–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1986). Learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 87–108.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 294–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., Rawson, K. A., Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2005). Comprehension. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F. (2005). Effects of structure strategy training and signaling on recall of text. In B. R. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 810–851). Newark: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F. (2003). Text coherence and readability. Topics in Language Disorders, 23(3), 204–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F., & Rice, G. E. (1984). The structure of text. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 319–352). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., Gabain, M., & Gabain, R. (1959). The language and thought of the child (3rd. ed.). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (1998). Comprehension's strategies instruction. In J. Osborn & F. Lehr (Eds.), Literacy for all (pp. 113–133). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., Ghatala, E. S., Pirie, J., & Woloshyn, V. E. (1990). Being really, really certain you know the main idea doesn't mean you do. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 39, 249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. B. (1995). Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers, and policy makers. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, R. J. (1988). Effects of strategy training on the identification of the main idea of expository passages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 21–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verderber, R. F. (2005). Dealing with feelings. In J. Langan (Ed.), Ten steps to building college reading skills (4 ed., pp. 497–501). West Berlin: Townsend Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, J. F., & Silfies, L. N. (1996). Learning from history text: The interaction of knowledge and comprehension skill with text structure. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 45–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1988). The genesis of higher mental functions. In K. Richardson & S. Sheldon (Eds.), Cognitive development to adolescence: A reader. (pp. 61–79). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D. (2006). What can standardized reading tests tell us? Question-answer relationships and students' performance. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 36, 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P. (1988). Identifying main ideas: A basic aspect of reading comprehension. Topics in Language Disorders, 8, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P., Taylor, M. B., & Ganger, S. (1981). Text variations at the level of the individual sentence and the comprehension of simple expository paragraphs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 851–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar