Collaborative Strategic Reading with University EFL Learners

References

• Aarnoutse, C., & Schellings, G. (2003). Learning reading strategies by triggering reading motivation. Educational Studies, 29(4), 387–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Fox, E. (2004). A historical perspective on reading research and practice. In R. B. Ruddel & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 33–68). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Almasi, J. F. 1996. The nature of fourth graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussion of literature, Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 314–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (2002). Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based practices (pp. 77–95). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, T. C. (1968). What is reading? In T. Clymer (Ed.), Innovation and change in reading instruction. 67th Yearbook of the National Society for Study of Education: University Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birjandi, P., & Noroozi, I. (2008). The effect of cognitive strategies training on reading comprehension of male and female Iranian students. Roshd FLT Journal, 87(22), 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. P., Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Ugel, N., Hamff, A., & Hougen, M. (2000). Reading outcomes for students with and without learning disabilities in general education middle school content area classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23(23), 24–38.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. A., & Silberstein, S. (1979). Toward a realization of psycholinguistic principles in the ESL reading class. In R. Mackay, B. Barkman, & R. Jordan (Eds.), Reading in a Second Language (pp. 48–65). Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Coady, J. (1979). A psycholinguistic model of the ESL reader. In R. Mackay, B. Barkman, & R. Jordan (Eds.), Reading in a second language (pp. 5–12). Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31, 349–365.
   Google Scholar
• Eskey, E. D. (1986). Theoretical foundations. In F. Dubin, D. E. Eskey, & W. Grabe (Eds.), Teaching second language reading for academic purposes (pp. 3–23). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Eskey, D. E. (2002). Reading and teaching L2 reading. TESOL Journal, 11(1), 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Faggella-Luby, M. N., & Deshler, D. D. (2008). Reading comprehension in adolescents with LD: What we know; what we need to learn. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(2), 70–78.
   Google Scholar
• Farhady, H., & Mirhassani, A. (2001). Reading through interaction. Tehran: Zabankadeh. Felix, U. (2005). E-learning pedagogy in the third millennium: The need for combining social and cognitive constructivist approaches. ReCALL, 17(1), 85–100.
   Google Scholar
• Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (2005). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice (2nd ed., pp. 8–38). New York, NY: Teacher's College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fotovatian, S., & Shokrpour, N. (2007). Comparison of the efficiency of reading comprehension strategies on Iranian university students' comprehension. Journal of College Reading & Learning, 37(2), 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaith, G. M. (2003). Effects of learning together model of cooperative learning on English as a foreign language reading achievement, academic self-esteem, and feelings of school alienation. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(3), 451–474.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaith, G., & Abd El-Malak, M. (2004). Effect of jigsaw II on literal and higher order EFL reading comprehension. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 105–115.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W. (2004). Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W. (2002). Dilemmas for the development of second language reading abilities. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 276–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedegaard, M. (1996). The zone of proximal development as basis for instruction. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 171–195). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haghani, M. (2004). Incorporating strategy training into reading instruction. Language and Literature, 20(7), 100–134.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, T. (2007). Teaching second language reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, W. (1995). Methods: Doing social research. Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice-Hall Canada Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Juan Capistrano, CA.: Kagan Cooperative Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1996). Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second language. Elementary School Journal, 96, 275–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. S. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 99, 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A crosslinguistic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdizadeh, A. H. (2006). Assessing the content of textbooks for the junior high school level. Roshd FLT Journal, 20(77), 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mathewson, G. C. (1994). Model of attitude influence upon reading and learning to read. In R. B. Ruddell, M. P. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mirhassani, S. A. (2007). The teacher or the textbook. Roshd FLT Journal, 82(21), 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H. (2003). Higher-level and lower-level text processing skills in advanced ESL reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 261–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Razavi, R. (2008). Cooperative learning in university ESP classes. Zaban Journal, 3(2), 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., & Eckstut-Didier, S. (2003). Strategic reading: Building effective reading skills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS version 12(2nd ed.). Berkshire, NY: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 609–640). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Short, K., & Burke, C. (1991). Creating curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. (1978). Reading. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. (1982). Understanding reading. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tg Nor Rizan, Tg, M. M. (2007). The effects of cooperative learning on English as a second language (ESL) reading performance of undergraduates. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Tok, S. (2008). Effects of cooperative learning method of pairs check technique on reading comprehension. Elementary Education Online, 7(3), 748–757.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., & Edmonds, M. (2006). Reading comprehension for older readers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(3), 131–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. (1993). Literature review on reading strategy research. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Mid-South Educational Research Association: New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Zoghi, M. (2002). Building reading skills up at the tertiary level. Roshd FLT Journal, 78(69), 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Zoghi, M., Hazita, A., & Tg Nor Rizan, Tg, M. M. (2006). CSR II: An instructional technique for reading strategies. The Proceedings of SoLLs. INTEC.07: Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
   Google Scholar