Processing Different Kinds of Expository Text: An Investigation of Students’ Strategy Use in Postsecondary Education

References

• Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61, 364–373. doi:10.1598/RT.61.5.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almasi, J. F., & Fullerton, S. K. (2012). Teaching strategic processes in reading (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1985). Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication, 2, 3–23. doi:10.1177/0741088385002001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, E. A. (1946). Foundations of reading instruction, with emphasis on differentiated guidance. New York, NY: American Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Burchard, M. S., & Swerdzewski, P. (2009). Learning effectiveness of a strategic learning course. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 40(1), 14–34. doi:10.1080/10790195.2009.10850322
   Google Scholar
• Caverly, D. C., Nicholson, S. A., & Radcliffe, R. (2004). The effectiveness of strategic reading instruction for college developmental readers. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 35(1), 25–49. doi:10.1080/10790195.2004.10850166
   Google Scholar
• Chambliss, M. J. (1995). Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 778–807. doi:10.2307/748198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffin, C. (1997). Constructing and giving value to the past: An investigation into secondary school history. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 196–230). London, UK: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• College Board College Board Standards. (2006). English language arts college board standards for college success. Retrieved from http://www.asainstitute.org/conference2008/featuredsessions/collegeboard-english-language-arts_cbscs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fuerst, J. B. (2005). Seeing is not believing. Parsippany, NJ: Celebration.
   Google Scholar
• Ganeri, A. (2005). A year in Antarctica. Parsippany, NJ: Celebration.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., & Rakestraw, J. J. A. (2000). Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 311–335). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gott, R. (2005). Astronauts take flight. Parsippany, NJ: Celebration Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilden, K., & Pressley, M. (2011). Verbal protocols of reading. In N. K. Duke & M. H. Mallette (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (2nd ed., pp. 427–481). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kafka, T. (2005). Charting your course. Parsippany, NJ: Celebration Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keene, E. O., & Zimmerman, S. (2007). Mosaic of thought: The power of comprehension strategy instruction (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., & Young, K. M. (1996). Two texts, three readers: Distance and expertise in reading history. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 441–486. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1404_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N. M., & Myers, J. (2018). Comprehension in disciplinary learning: An examination of elementary readers' processing and recall. The Journal of Educational Research, 1–14. doi:10.1080/00220671.2018.1438982.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., Stockdill, D., Kim, K., & Kim, H. J. (2011). The role of text in disciplinary learning. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 453–486). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nash-Ditzel, S. (2010). Metacognitive reading strategies can improve self-regulation. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 40(2), 45–63. doi:10.1080/10790195.2010.10850330
   Google Scholar
• Olson, G. M., Mack, R. L., & Duffy, S. A. (1981). Cognitive aspects of genre. Poetics, 10, 283–315. Retrieved from http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505592/description#description
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19, 228–242. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 609–640). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Reisman, A. (2012). Reading like a historian: Document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools. Cognition and Instruction, 30, 86–112. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.634081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, T. (2006). Motivating novice students to read their textbooks. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33, 136–140.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C. (2009). Disciplinary comprehension. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 240–260). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, S. (2005). Save our Earth. Parsippany, NJ: Celebration Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taraban, R., Rynearson, K., & Kerr, M. (2000). College students’ academic performance and self-reports of comprehension and strategy use. Reading Psychology, 21, 283–308. doi:10.1080/027027100750061930
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W. (2003). The effect of learning and motivation strategies training on college students’ achievement. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 430–437. doi:10.1353/csd.2003.0034
   Google Scholar
• Wignell, P. (1994). Genre across the curriculum. Linguistics and Education, 6, 355–372. doi:10.1016/0898-5898(94)90003-5
   Google Scholar