References
- Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022086
- Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human behavior, 28(5), 1816–1828. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023
- Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1
- Barrouillet, P., Bernardin, S., Portrat, S., Vergauwe, E., & Camos, V. (2007). Time and cognitive load in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 570–585. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.570
- Biancarosa, G., & Griffiths, G. G. (2012). Technology tools to support reading in the digital age. The Future of Children, 22(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2012.0014
- Bigozzi, L., Tarchi, C., Vagnoli, L., Valente, E., & Pinto, G. (2017). Reading fluency as a predictor of school outcomes across grades 4–9. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00200
- Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269
- The College Board. (2017). SAT practice tests. https://collegereadiness.collegeboard.org/sat/practice/full-length-practice-tests
- Daniel, D. B., & Woody, W. D. (2013). E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts. Computers & Education, 62, 18–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.106/j.compedu.2012.10.016
- Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
- DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J. A. (2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1616–1641. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.012
- Dillon, A. (1992). Reading from paper versus screens: A critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1297–1326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139208967394
- Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2011). Children’s reading comprehension difficulties: Nature, causes, and treatments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 139–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411408673
- Kaur, J., Malik, M., Sharma, P., & Jangra, S. (2018). Effect of mental fatigue on memory and retention: An experimental study. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 5(7), 620–625.
- Kim, H., & Kim, J. O. A. N. (2013). Reading from an LCD monitor versus paper: Teenagers’ reading performance. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrset.2012.170
- Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 138–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.005
- Latini, N., Bråten, I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Salmerón, L. (2019). Investigating effects of reading medium and reading purpose on behavioral engagement and textual integration in a multiple text context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101797. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101797
- Lauterman, T., & Ackerman, R. (2014). Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 455–463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.046
- Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700–712. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510632040
- Mangen, A. (2008). Hypertext fiction reading: Haptics and immersion. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(4), 404–419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00380.x
- Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002
- Margolin, S. J., Driscoll, C., Toland, M. J., & Kegler, J. L. (2013). E-readers, computer screens, or paper: Does reading comprehension change across media platforms? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(4), 512–519. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2930
- Mizrachi, D., Salaz, A. M., Kurbanoglu, S., & Boustany, J. (2018). Academic reading format preferences and behaviors among university students worldwide: A comparative survey analysis. PLoS ONE, 13(5), e0197444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197444
- Nichols, M. (2016). Reading and studying on the screen: An overview of literature toward good learning design practice. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 20(1), 33–43. https://www.jofdl.nz/index.php/JOFDL/article/view/263/200
- Noyes, J., & Garland, K. (2008). Computer- vs paper-based tasks: Are they equivalent? Ergonomics, 51(9), 1352–1375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130802170387
- Oborne, D. J., & Holton, D. (1988). Reading from screen versus paper: There is no difference. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 28(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(88)80049-X
- Royer, J. M., Marchant, H. G., Sinatra, G. M., & Lovejoy, D. A. (1990). The prediction of college course performance from reading comprehension performance: Evidence for general and specific prediction factors. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 158–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312027001158
- Sackstein, S., Spark, L., & Jenkins, A. (2015). Are e-books effective tools for learning? Reading speed and comprehension: IPad® i vs. paper. South African Journal of Education, 35(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v35n4a1202
- Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1143794
- Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09349791
- Wästlund, E., Norlander, T., & Archer, T. (2008). The effect of page layout on mental workload: A dual-task experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1229–1245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.001
- Wästlund, E., Reinikka, H., Norlander, T., & Archer, T. (2005). Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information: Psychological and physiological factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(2), 377–394. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.007