Is anterior decompression and fusion superior to laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament? A systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis. Spine 2015;40:E675–93. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An HS, Alshihabi L, Kurd M. Surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014;22:420–9. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-07-420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsunaga S, Sakou T. Ossifcation of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: etiology and natural history. Spine 2012;37:E309–14. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318241ad33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith ZA, Buchanan CC, Raphael D, Khoo LT. Ossifcation of the posterior longitudinal ligament: pathogenesis, management, and current surgical approaches. Neurosurg Focus 2011;30:E10. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.FOCUS10256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonenobu K. Is surgery indicated for asymptomatic or mildly myelopathic patients with significant ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament?. Spine 2012;37:E315–7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318239ccbd
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein NE. What you need to know about ossifcation of the posterior longitudinal ligament to optimize cervical spine surgery: A review. Surg Neurol Int 2014;5:S93–118. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.130696
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein N. Diagnosis and surgical management of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J 2002;2:436–49. doi: 10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00394-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mizuno J, Nakagawa H. Ossified posterior longitudinal ligament: management strategies and outcomes. Spine J 2006;6:282S–288S. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.05.009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seng C, Tow BP, Siddiqui MA, Srivastava A, Wang L, Yew AK, et al. Surgically treated cervical myelopathy: a functional otcome comparison study between multilevel anterior cervical decompression fusion with instrumentation and posterior laminoplasty. Spine J 2013;13(7):723–1. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai K, Okawa A, Takahashi M, Arai Y, Kawabata S, Enomoto M, et al. Five-year follow-up evaluation of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective comparative study of anterior decompression and fusion with floating method versus laminoplasty. Spine 2012;37:367–76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821f4a51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, Matsuoka T, Miyamoto S, Yonenobu K. Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years. Spine 2001;26:1443–7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200107010-00011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards CC, Heller JG, Murakami H. Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis. Spine 2002;27:1168–75. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200206010-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goto S, Kita T. Long-term follow-up evaluation of surgery for ossifcation of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 1995;20:2247–56. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199510001-00012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tani T, Ushida T, Ishida K, Iai H, Noguchi T, Yamamoto H. Relative safety of anterior microsurgical decompression versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with a massive ossifed posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 2002;27:2491–8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou Y, Liang L, Shi GD, Xu P, Xu GH, Shi JG, et al. Comparing effects of cervical anterior approach and laminoplasty in surgical management of cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament by a prospective nonrandomized controlled study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017;103:733–40. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koda M, Mochizuki M, Konishi H, Aiba A, Kadota R, Inada T, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (-) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eur Spine J 2016;25:2294. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4555-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Guo Y, Lu X, Chen D, Song D, Shi J, et al. Surgical strategy for multilevel severe ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011;24:24–30. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181c7e91e
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K, et al. Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 2007;32:654–60. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000257566.91177.cb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Li Y, Chen Y, Wu W, Zou D. Cervical curvature, spinal cord MRIT2 signal, and occupying ratio impact surgical approach selection in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eur Spine J 2013;22:1480–8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2707-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimori T, Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Takenaka S, Kashii M, Kaito T, et al. Long-term results of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with an occupying ratio of 60% or more. Spine 2014;39:58–67. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B, Yoon DH, Shin HC, Kim KN, Yi S, Shin DA, et al. Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of anterior decompression and fusion for cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J 2015;15:875–84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masaki Y, Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Aramomi M, Hashimoto M, Koda M, et al. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007;20:7–13. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211260.28497.35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Ahn Y, Lee JH. Laser-assisted anterior cervical corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for cervical myelopathic patients with multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Photomed Laser Surg 2008;26:119–27. doi: 10.1089/pho.2007.2110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baba H, Imura S, Kawahara N, Nagata S, Tomita K. Osteoplastic laminoplasty for cervical myeloradiculopathy secondary to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Int Orthop 1995;19(1):40–5. doi: 10.1007/BF00184913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. 2016 [Cited 2016 April 5]. Available from http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Yuhara H, Steinmaus C, Cohen SE, Corley DA, Tei Y, Buffler PA. Is diabetes mellitus an independent risk factor for colon cancer and rectal cancer?. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106:1911–21. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–58. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J 1997;315:629–34. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein NE. Diagnosis of OPLL with MR and CT: Diagnosis of Early OPLL. J Spinal Disord 1996: 9477–84.
   Google Scholar
• Lee D, Joo Y, Hwang CJ, Lee CS, Cho JH. A novel technique to correct kyphosis in cervical myelopathy due to continuous-type ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg Spine 2017;26:325–30. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.SPINE16542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagi HC, Beutler W, Carroll E, Connolly PJ. Airway complications associated with surgery on the anterior cervical spine. Spine 2002;27:949–53. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200205010-00013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph V, Kumar GS, Rajshekhar V. Cerebrospinal fluid leak during cervical corpectomy for ossifed posterior longitudinal ligament: incidence, management, and outcome. Spine 2009;34:491–4. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318195d245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, Grigorian AA, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine 2007;32:2310–7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318154c57e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman F, Kaptanoglu E, Hasturk AE. Esophageal perforation after anterior cervical surgery: a review of the literature for over half a century with a demonstrative case and a proposed novel algorithm. Eur Spine J 2016;25:2037–49. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4394-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng F, Ruan W, Liu Z, Li Y, Cai L. Anterior versus posterior approach for the treatment of cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2016;27:26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Xu W, Cheng T, Yang HL. Anterior versus posterior surgery for multilevel cervical myelopathy, which one is better? A systematic review. Eur Spine J 2011;20:224–35. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1486-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo J, Cao K, Huang S, Li L, Yu T, Cao C, et al. Comparison of anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2015;24:1621–30. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3911-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y. Surgical treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and its outcomes: posterior surgery by laminoplasty. Spine 2012;37:E303–8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318239cca0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denaro V, Longo UG, Berton A, Salvatore G, Denaro L. Favourable outcome of posterior decompression and stabilization in lordosis for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the spinal cord “back shift” concept. Eur Spine J 2015;24:826–31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4298-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suda K, Abumi K, Ito M, Shono Y, Kaneda K, Fujiya M. Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive opendoor laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2003;28:1258–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida K, Nakajima H, Sato R, Yayama T, Mwaka ES, Kobayashi S, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy associated with kyphosis or sagittal sigmoid alignment: outcome after anterior or posterior decompression. J Neurosurg Spine 2009;11:521–8. doi: 10.3171/2009.2.SPINE08385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar