The standing and walking assessment tool for individuals with spinal cord injury: A qualitative study of validity and clinical use

References

• Ditunno PL, Patrick M, Stineman M, Ditunno JF. Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(7):500–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craven C, Verrier M, Balioussis C, Wolfe D, Hsieh J, Noonan V, et al. Rehabilitation environmental scan atlas: capturing capacity in Canadian SCI rehabilitation. Vancouver (BC): Rick Hansen Institute; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hedel HJ, Wirz M, Dietz V. Standardized assessment of walking capacity after spinal cord injury: the European network approach. Neurol Res. 2008;30(1):61–73. doi: 10.1179/016164107X230775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verrier M, Gagnon D, Musselman K, Canadian Standing and Walking Measures Group. Toolkit for SCI Standing and Walking Assessment [document on the Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 December 26]. Available from http://sci2.rickhanseninstitute.org/standing-walking/rhscir-toolkit/sci2-standingandwalking-toolkit-online-html.
   Google Scholar
• Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Macki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992;83(Suppl 2):S7–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musselman K, Brunton K, Lam T, Yang J. Spinal cord injury functional ambulation profile: a new measure of walking ability. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(3):285–93. doi: 10.1177/1545968310381250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musselman KE, Yang JF. Spinal cord injury functional ambulation profile: a preliminary looks at responsiveness. Phys Ther. 2014;94(2):240–50. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell LE, Myers AM. The activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50A(1):M28–34. doi: 10.1093/gerona/50A.1.M28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah G, Oates AR, Arora T, Lanovaz JL, Musselman KE. Measuring balance confidence after spinal cord injury: the reliability and validity of the activities-specific balance confidence scale. J Spinal Cord Med. 2017;40(6):768–76. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1369212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hedel HJ, Wirz M, Dietz V. Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of 3 walking tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(2):190–6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leddy AL, Crowner BE, Earhart GM. Utility of the mini-BESTest, BESTest, and BESTest sections for balance assessments in individuals with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011;35(2):90–7. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31821a620c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen V, Opheim A, Halvarsson A, Franzén E, Roaldsen KS. Comparison of the Berg balance scale and the mini-BESTest for assessing balance in ambulatory people with spinal cord injury: validation study. Phys Ther. 2017;97(6):677–87. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonan VK, Kwon BK, Soril L, Fehlings MG, Hurlbert RJ, Townson A, et al. The Rick Hansen spinal cord injury registry (RHSCIR): a national patient-registry. Spinal Cord. 2012;50(1):22–7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miech EJ, Rattray NA, Flanagan ME, Damschroder L, Schmid AA, Damush TM. Inside help: An integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation. SAGE Open Med. 2018;6, 2050312118773261. doi:10.1177/2050312118773261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach KE. Measurement of health outcomes: reliability, validity and responsiveness. JPO J Pract Orthod. 2006;18(6):8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Graham I, Logan J, Harrison M, Straus S, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24. doi: 10.1002/chp.47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger J, Singh H, Mansfield A, Hitzig SL, Lenton E, Musselman KE. The experiences of physical rehabilitation in individuals with spinal cord injuries: a qualitative thematic synthesis. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(12):1367–83. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1425745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan EA, Murray J. The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):96–107. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette DU, Halbert J, Iverson C, Miceli E, Shah P. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Phys Ther. 2009;89(2):125–35. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun T, Rieckmann A, Weber F, Grüneberg C. Current use of measurement instruments by physiotherapists working in Germany: a cross-sectional online survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):810–26. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3563-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musselman KE, Lemay JF, Walden K, MacCullam S, Guy K, et al. Assessment of upright mobility after spinal cord injury: a “how-to” guide to the Canadian spinal cord injury standing and walking assessment tool. 7th National SCI Workshop Abstract and Workshops 7th National Spinal Cord Injury Conference November 9–11, 2017. J Spinal Cord Med. 2017;40(6):813–69. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1369666
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colquhoun HL, Lamontagne ME, Duncan EAS, Fiander M, Champagne C, Grimshaw JM. A systematic review of interventions to increase the use of standardized outcome measures by rehabilitation professionals. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(3):299–309. doi: 10.1177/0269215516644309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Middendorp JJ, Hosman AJ, Donders AR, Pouw MH, Ditunno Jr JF, Curt A, et al. A clinical prediction rule for ambulation outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet. 2011;377(9770):1004–10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62276-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scivoletto G, Tamburella F, Laurenza L, Torre M, Molinari M. Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery after spinal cord injury. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8(141):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar