PSO based Automated Test Coverage Analysis of Event Driven Systems

References

• Bertolino, A., Software testing forever: Old and new processes and techniques for validating today's applications. 9th International Conference Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2008), Monte Porzio Catone, June 2008, LNCS 5089, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Harroled, M. (2000). Testing: A roadmap. In proceedings of the 22nd international conference on the future of software engineering (63–72), Limerick, Ireland. IEEE Computer Society/ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Memon, AM (2007). An event-flow model of GUI-based applications for testing: Research articles. Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 17(3</–insert>), 137–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Qing, & Memon, AM (2008). Article No. 7, ISSN:1049-331X Using a pilot study to derive a GUI model for automated testing. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 18(2)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afzal, W., Torkar, R., & Feldt, R. (2009). A systematic review of search-based testing for non-functional system properties. Information and Software Technology, 51(6</–insert>), 957–976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A. M., Pollack, M. E., & Soffa, M. L. (1999). Using a goal-driven approach to generate test cases for GUIs. In 21st International Conference on Software Engineering, May 1999 (pp. 257–266). New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Memon, A. M., Pollack, M. E., & Soffa, M. L. (2001). Hierarchical GUI test case generation using automated planning. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 27(2), 144–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A. M., Pollack, M. E., & Soffa, M. L. (2000). Automated test oracles for GUIs. In Proceedings of the ACMSIGSOFT 8th International symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE-8), 8–10 November 2000 (pp. 30–39). New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Memon, A. M., Soffa, M. L., & Pollack, M. E. (2001). Coverage criteria for GUI testing. In Proceedings of the 8th European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC) and 9th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE-9), September 2001 (pp. 256–267). New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Memon, A. M., & Xie, Q. (2005). Studying the fault-detection effectiveness of GUI test cases for rapidly evolving software. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(10), 884–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Nagarajan, A., & Xie, Q. (2005). Automating regression testing for evolving GUI software. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 17(1), 27–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A. M., & Soffa, M. L. (2003). Regression testing of GUIs. In Proceedings of the 9th European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC) and 11th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE-11), September 2003 (pp. 118–127). New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, BF, Eyres, D. E., & Sthamer, H. H. (1998). A strategy for using genetic algorithms to automate branch and fault-based testing. The Computer Journal, 41(2), 98–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. F., Sthamer, H. H., & Eyres, D. E. (1996). Automatic structural testing using genetic algorithms. The Software Engineering Journal, 11(5), 299–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, C., McGraw, G., & Schatz, M. (2001). Generating software test data by evolution. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 27(12), 1085–1110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pargas, RP, Harrold, MJ, & Peck, RR (1999). Test-data generation using genetic algorithms. Journal of Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 9(4), 263–282.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, N., Clark, J., Mander, K., & McDermid, J. (2000). Automated test-data generation for exception conditions. Software: Practice and Experience, 30(1), 61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganov, S., Killmar, C., Khurshid, S., & Perry, D. (2008). Test generation for graphical user interfaces based on symbolic execution. Third International Workshop on Automation of Software Testing (AST), Leipzig, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Paiva, AC, Faria, JC, & Vidal, RF (2007). Vidal: Towards the integration of visual and formal models for GUI testing. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 190(2), 99–111.
   Google Scholar
• Rauf, A., Anwar, S., Jaffar, A., Shahid, AA. Automated GUI test coverage analysis using GA  2010 Seventh International Conference on Information Technology (ITNG 2010) to be held 12–14 April 2010 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, C. (1997). A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm. In Proceedings of the World Multiconferenceon Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (pp. 4104–4109)
   Google Scholar
• Laskari, E. C., Parsopoulos, K. E., & Vrahatis, M. N. (2002, May). Particle swarm optimization for integer programming. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (Vol. 2, pp. 1582–1587). IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoofs, L., & Naudts, B. (2002, May). Swarm intelligence on the binary constraint satisfaction problem. In IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (Vol. 2, pp. 1444–1449). IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korel, B. (1990). Automated software test data generation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 16(8), 870–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar