125
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Design of novel PhMTNA inhibitors, targeting neurological disorder through homology modeling, molecular docking, and dynamics approaches

, , , , , & show all
Pages 28-38 | Received 17 Oct 2018, Accepted 05 Jan 2019, Published online: 26 Jun 2019

References

  • Ainsworth C. Molecular medicine: lost in translation. Nature. 2005;435:556–558.
  • Kimball SR. Eukaryotic initiation factor eIF2. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1999;31:25–29.
  • Sonenberg N, Hinnebusch AG. Regulation of translation initiation in eukaryotes: mechanisms and biological targets. Cell. 2009;136:731–745.
  • Eiler D, Lin J, Simonetti A, et al. Initiation factor 2 crystal structure reveals a different domain organization from eukaryotic initiation factor 5B and mechanism among translational GTPases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:2.
  • Scheper GC, van der Knaap MS, Proud CG. Translation matters: protein synthesis defects in inherited disease. The Netherlands: Nature Publishing Group; 2007.
  • Van der Knaap MS, Barth PG, Gabreels FJ, et al. A new leukoencephalopathy with vanishing white matter. Neurology. 1997;48:845–855.
  • vander knap MS, Leegwater PAJ, Knost AAM, et al. Mutations in each of five subunits of five subunits of translation initiation factor eIF2B can cause leukoencephalopathy with vanishing white matter. Ann Neurol. 2002;51(2):264–270.
  • Kyrpides NC, Woese CR. Archaeal translation initiation revisited: the initiation factor 2 and eukaryotic initiation factor 2B α–β–δ subunit families. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95.
  • Prerana G, Srivastava A, Jayaprakash P, et al. In silico analysis suggests that PH0702 and PH0208 encode for methylthioribose-1-phosphate isomerase and ribose-1,5-bisphosphate isomerase, respectively, rather than aIF2Bβ and aIF2Bδ. Gene. 2016;575:118–126.
  • Aono R, Sato T, Yano A, et al. Enzymatic characterization of AMP phosphorylase and ribose-1, 5-bisphosphate isomerase functioning in an archaeal AMP metabolic pathway. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:6847–6855.
  • Guru Raj Rao R, Biswal J, Prabhu D, et al. Identification of potential inhibitors for AIRS from de novo purine biosynthesis pathway through molecular modeling studies – a computational approach. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2016;34(10):2199–213.
  • The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:204–212.
  • Sievers F, Higgins DG. Clustal omega, accurate alignment of very large numbers of sequences. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1079:105–116.
  • Shen MY, Sali A. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci. 2006;15:2507–2524.
  • Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, et al. PROCHECK a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr. 1993;26:283–291.
  • Bowie JU, Luthy R, Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science. 1991;253:164–170.
  • Schuttelkopf AW, van Aalten DMF. PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004;D60:1355–1363.
  • Stambulchik E. Xmgrace. 1997. Available from: http://www.gromacs.org/Xmgrace
  • Schrödinger, v.4.0. LLC, New York, USA. 2014. Available from: www.schrodinger.com
  • Gogoi P, Mordina P, Kanaujia SP. Structural insights into the catalytic mechanism of 5-methylthioribose 1- phosphate isomerase. J Struc Biol. 2019;205(1):67–77.
  • Friesner RA, Murphy RB, Repasky MP, et al. Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophoic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. J Med Chem. 2006;49:6177–6196.
  • Hartshorn MJ, Verdonk ML, Chessari G, et al. Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein-ligand docking performance. J Med Chem. 2007;50:726–741.
  • Halgren TA, Murphy RB, Friesner RA, et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. J Med Chem. 2004;47:1750–1759.
  • Friesner RA, Banks JL, Murphy RB, et al. Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J Med Chem. 2004;47:1739–1749.
  • Sherman W, Beard HS, Farid R. Use of an induced fit receptor structure in virtual screening. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2006;67:83–84.
  • PyMOL. 2010. Molecular graphics system. Available from: https://pymol.org/2/
  • Qikprop version 7.8. 2014. Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY. Available from: www.schrodinger.com/qikprop
  • Moreira IS, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ. Computational alanine scanning mutagenesis–an improved methodological approach. J Comput Chem. 2007;28:644–654.
  • Prime. 2014. Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY. Available from: www.schrodinger.com/prime
  • Li J, Abel R, Zhu K, et al. The VSGB 2.0 model: a next generation energy model for high resolution protein structure modeling. Proteins. 2011;2011:2794–2812.
  • Jaguar, version 7.8. 2014. Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY. Available from: www.schrodinger.com/Jaguar
  • Bochevarov AD, Harder E, Hughes TF, et al. Jaguar: a high-performance quantum chemistry software program with strengths in life and materials sciences. Int J Quantum Chem. 2013;2013:2110–2142.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.