Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) and design of novel ligands that demonstrate high potency and target selectivity as protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP 1B) inhibitors as an effective strategy used to model anti-diabetic agents

References

• Bandyopadhyay D, Kusari A, Kenner KA, et al. Protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B complexes with the insulin receptor in vivo and is tyrosine-phosphorylated in the presence of insulin. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(3):1639–1645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cengiz N, Rao J, Sanyal A, et al. Designing functionalizable hydrogels through thiol–epoxy coupling chemistry. Chem Commun. 2013;49(95):11191–11193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quang T, Ngan N, Yoon C-S, et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibitors from the roots of Cudrania tricuspidata. Molecules. 2015;20(6):11173–11183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhika R, Sudarsanam D. Docking of Rheum emodi compounds against protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B. Int J Pharm Biol Sci. 2012;3:1150–1154.
   Google Scholar
• Rohmah RN, Hardiyanti F, Fatchiyah F. Inhibition on JAK-STAT3 signaling transduction cascade is taken by bioactive peptide alpha-S2 casein protein from goat Ethawah breed milk. Acta Inform Med. 2015;23(4):233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saltiel A, Kahn R. For reviews on insulin and PTPs signaling. Nature. 2001;414(6865):799–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garber A. Obesity and type 2 diabetes: which patients are at risk? Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14(5):399–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Viswanathan V. Burden of type 2 diabetes and its complications–The Indian scenario. Curr Sci. 2002;83:1471–1476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World health statistics 2016: monitoring health for the SDGs sustainable development goals. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Veerasamy R, Rajak H, Jain A, et al. Validation of QSAR models-strategies and importance. Int J Drug Des Discov. 2011;3:511–519.
   Google Scholar
• Bhadoriya KS, Sharma MC, Jain SV. 2, 4-Dihydropyrano [2, 3-c] pyrazole: Discovery of new lead as through pharmacophore modelling, atom-based 3D-QSAR, virtual screening and docking strategies for improved anti-HIV-1 chemotherapy. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2015;9(4):521–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves BJ, Braga RC, Melo-Filho CC, et al. QSAR-based virtual screening: advances and applications in drug discovery. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas V, Jain A, Jain A, et al. Virtual screening: a fast tool for drug design. Sci Pharm. 2008;76(3):333–360.
   Google Scholar
• Hehre WJ, Huang WW. 1995. Chemistry with computation: an introduction to SPARTAN. Irvine (CA): Wavefunction, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Evans DA. History of the Harvard ChemDraw project. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53(42):11140–11145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap CW. PaDEL‐descriptor: An open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints. J Comput Chem. 2011;32(7):1466–1474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton P. Generating and e-mailing feedback to students using MS Office. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Dallakyan S, Olson AJ. 2015. Small-molecule library screening by docking with PyRx. Methods Mol Biol. 1263:243–250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danishuddin M, Khan SN, Khan AU. Molecular interactions between mitochondrial membrane proteins and the C-terminal domain of PB1-F2: an in silico approach. J Mol Model. 2010;16(3):535–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malamas MS, Sredy J, Moxham C, et al. Novel benzofuran and benzothiophene biphenyls as inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B with antihyperglycemic properties. J Med Chem. 2000;43(7):1293–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B. 1988;37(2):785–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennard RW, Stone LA. Computer aided design of experiments. Technometrics. 1969;11(1):137–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tropsha A. Best practices for QSAR model development, validation, and exploitation. Mol Inf. 2010;29(6–7):476–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers D. Evolutionary statistics: using a genetic algorithm and model reduction to isolate alternate statistical hypotheses of experimental data. Paper presented at: the ICGA. 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Khaled K, Abdel-Shafi N. Quantitative structure and activity relationship modeling study of corrosion inhibitors: genetic function approximation and molecular dynamics simulation methods. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2011;6:4077–4094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golbraikh A, Tropsha A. Beware of q2! J Mol Graph Model. 2002;20(4):269–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy K, Mitra I, Kar S, et al. Comparative studies on some metrics for external validation of QSPR models. J Chem Inf Model. 2012;52(2):396–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tropsha A, Gramatica P, Gombar VK. The importance of being earnest: validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb Sci. 2003;22(1):69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson L, Jaworska J, Worth AP, et al. Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification-and regression-based QSARs. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(10):1361–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Li X, Liu X, et al. Docking and 3D-QSAR studies on the Ah receptor binding affinities of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and dibenzofurans (PCDFs). Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011;32(3):478–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oluwaseye A, Uzairu A, Shallangwa GA, et al. A novel QSAR model for designing, evaluating, and predicting the anti-MES activity of new 1H-pyrazole-5-carboxylic acid derivatives. J Turk Chem Soc A Chem. 2017;4(3):739–774.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Wan H, Shi Y, et al. Personal experience with four kinds of chemical structure drawing software: review on ChemDraw, ChemWindow, ISIS/Draw, and ChemSketch. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004;44(5):1886–1890.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huey R, Morris GM, Forli S. 2012. Using AutoDock 4 and AutoDock Vina with AutoDockTools: a Tutorial. La Jolla (CA): The Scripps Research Institute Molecular Graphics Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2009;31(2):NA–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravichandran KS. Beginnings of a good apoptotic meal: the find-me and eat-me signaling pathways. Immunity. 2011;35(4):445–455. 
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramatica P. Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external. QSAR Comb Sci. 2007;26(5):694–701.
   Google Scholar
• Verma SK, Thareja S. Molecular docking assisted 3D-QSAR study of benzylidene-2, 4-thiazolidinedione derivatives as PTP-1B inhibitors for the management of Type-2 diabetes mellitus. RSC Adv. 2016;6(40):33857–33867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur DE, Uzairu A, Mamza P, et al. Quantitative structure–activity relationship study on potent anticancer compounds against MOLT-4 and P388 leukemia cell lines. J Adv Res. 2016;7(5):823–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar