References
- Brudermann, G.E. (1994). Climbability of CCA treated poles (Tech. Rep. No. CEASD-169A). Montreal, Qc, Canada: Canadian Electrical Association, Technology Department.
- Cooper, P.A., Ung, Y.T., Ma, F.M.S., & Zirk, W.E. (1995). Performance of a new PEG additive for CCA treated red pine poles, CWPA. In Proceeding of the 16th Canadian Wood Preservers’ Association, Toronto (pp. 151–166). Toronto, Ont., Canada: University of Toronto, Faculty of Forestry.
- Hanrahan, R.C. (1993). Factors influencing the climbability of CCA-PEG wood poles (Tech. Rep. No. HSD-SD-93-5). Toronto, Canada: Ontario Hydro, Health and Safety Division.
- Hawthorne, S.H. (1981). Pole climbing trials–Orangeville C&D centre (Tech. Rep. No. 81-154-K). Toronto, Ont., Canada: Ontario Hydro, Research Division.
- Messina, E.E., & Landry, M. (1986). Hard data on pole climbability. Telephony, 210(6), 51–58.
- Montgomery, D.C. (1994). Fundamental concepts of design of experiments. New York: Wiley.
- Ontario Hydro, Bell Northern Research, & Bell Canada. (1982, December). The relationship between wood pole hardness and climbing acceptability. Toronto, Ont., Canada: Ontario Hydro, Bell Canda Joint Use Committe.
- Rey-Lescure, E., & Thomas, M. (1987). Design of linemen’s spurs (Tech. Rep. No. CEA 096 D 496). Montreal, Qc, Canada: Canadian Electrical Association.
- Sneider, M.F., Orr, G.W., Martin, J., & Joy, J. (1984). An ergonomic study of climbing utility poles. Proceedings of the 1984 International Conference on Occupational Ergonomics, 591–593.
- Trumble, B., & Messina, E. (1985). CCA-PEG pole preservative research. Proceedings of American Wood Preservers’ Association, 203–211.