91
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Relevance of Error Analysis in Graphical Symbols Evaluation

Pages 513-528 | Published online: 08 Jan 2015

References

  • American National Standards Institute (ANSI). (1991). Accredited standard on safety colors, signs symbols, labels and tags (Standard No. ANSI Z535.1—5). Washington DC, USA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association.
  • Böcker, M. (1993). A multiple index approach for the evaluation of pictograms. In Proceedings of the Nth International Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommunications, Darmstadt, Germany (pp. 73–85). Heidelberg, Germany: R. v. Decker’s Yerlag, G. Schenck GmbH.
  • European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). (1993). Technical report—Human Factors (HF): Results of an evaluation study of pictograms for point-to-point videotelephony. Sophia Antipolis, France: Author.
  • International Telecommunications Union (ITU). (1995). Procedures for designing, evaluating and selecting symbols, pictograms and icons (Recommendation F.910). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (1989). Procedures for the development and testing of public information symbols (Standard No. ISO 9186:1989). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
  • Magyar, R.L. (1990). Assessing icon appropriateness and icon discriminability with a paired comparison testing procedure. In Countdown to the 21st Century. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida (pp. 1204—1208). Santa Monica, CA, USA: Human Factors Society.
  • Nolan, P.R. (1989). Designing screen icons: Ranking and matching studies. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting (pp. 380–384). Santa Monica, CA, USA: Human Factors.
  • Tudor, L.G. (1994). The generation and testing of candidate telecommunications icons. In B. Blumenthal, J. Gornostaev, & C. Unger (Eds.), Proceedings of the East-West International Conference in HCI, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation (pp. 11–62). Moscow, Russian Federation: International Centre for Scientific and Technical Information (ICSTI).
  • Vora, P., Helander, M., Swede, H., & Wilson, J. (1991). Developing guidelines for symbol design: A comparison of methodologies. In Proceedings of Interface 1991 (pp. 6–11). Dayton, OH, USA: University of Dayton.
  • Webb, J.M., Sorenson, P.F., & Lyons, N.P. (1989). An empirical approach to the evaluation of icons. SIGCHI Bulletin, 21, 87—90.
  • Zwaga, H.L.G. (1989). Predicting the public’s comprehension of graphic symbols. In E.D. Megaw (Ed.), Contemporary ergonomics 1989 (pp. 431–436). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.