Occupational Medicine—Its Contribution to Protection and Promotion of Health at Work

References

• Beth-Huebner, M. (1998). Program for the prevention of health hazards caused by industrial substances: Results of the toxicological evaluation of chemicals. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 71(Suppl.), 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Brueggmann, M., Roetting, M., & Luczak, H. (2001). International comparison of occupational safety and health research—A review based on published articles. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 7(4), 387–401.
   Google Scholar
• European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2000). Future occupational safety and health research needs and priorities in the Member States of the European Union. Final publication, Version 11.0. Bilbao, Spain: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. (1993). First European survey on the work environment 1991–1992. Dublin, Ireland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. (1997). Second European survey on working conditions. Dublin, Ireland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Greim, H. (1999). Die Bedeutung der Genotoxizität in der Arbeitsmedizin [The importance of genotoxicity in occupational medicine]. Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin, 34(9), 372–375.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, J.M., & Calvert, I.A. (1996). Research priorities in occupational medicine: A survey of United Kingdom personnel managers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53, 642–644.
   Google Scholar
• Lehnert, G., & Valentin, H. (2000). Arbeits- und Betriebsmedizin zwischen Selbstverantwor-tung und Fremdbestimmung. Eine kritische Analyse der gegenwärtig diskutierten Situation [Occupational and works medicine between responsibility for itself and determination by outside forces]. Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin, 35(1), 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Luczak, H., Brueggmann, M., Rösler, D., & Rötting, M. (2000). Struktur der Arbeitsschut-zforschung—Ein quantitativer Vergleich von nationaler und internationaler Literatur sowie der Forschungsförderung des bmb+f und der BAuA [Structure of research in work safety and health promotion—a quantitative comparison of the national and international literature as well as of the financial support in this field by the German government]. In K. Scheuch, E. Haufe, & M. Weihrauch (Eds.), Arbeitsschutzforschung—Diskussionen am Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts (pp. 8–35). Dresden, Germany: TU Dresden.
   Google Scholar
• McEwen, B.S. (1998). Stress, adaption, and disease. Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Rantanen, J. (1996). Future perspectives of research—Need of multidisciplinarity, weaknesses and opportunities. In 5. Internat. Kolloquium Interdisziplinäre Forschung für Sicherheit und Gesundheit bei der Arbeit. Sektion Forschung der Internationalen Vereinigung für Soziale Sicherheit—IVSS (pp. 333–368). Rheinbreitbach, Germany: Druckerei Plump.
   Google Scholar
• Scheuch, K. (2000). Arbeitsmedizin im Wandel—bewährte Strategien und neue Herausfor-derungen [Changes in the field of occupational medicine—Proven strategies and new challenges]. Zentralblatt für Arbeitsmedizin, Arbeitsschutz und Ergnomie, 50(7), 210–218.
   Google Scholar
• Scheuch, K., Szadkowski, D., Piekarski, C., Schiele, O., Kochan, F., Giesen, Th., & Maintz, G. (2000). Positionen zu arbeitsmedizinischer Forschung und Praxis im Zusammenhang mit psychomentaler Belastung und Beanspruchung im Beruf [Positions in research and practice of occupational medicine in the field of occupational psychomental stress and strain]. Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin, 35(1), 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1996). National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) [On-line]. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/nora.html
   Google Scholar