Risk Perception and Risk-Taking Behavior of Construction Site Dumper Drivers

References

• Health and Safety Executive. Construction site transport safety: safe use of site dumpers (Construction information sheet No. 52, Revision 1). Sudbury, Suffolk, UK: HSE Books; 2006. Retrieved July 27, 2007, from: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/cis52.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Male GE, Corbridge JS. Safety of construction transport. A survey of standards and accidents associated with construction machinery (Specialist inspector report No. 58). London, UK: Health and Safety Executive; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bomel Ltd. The development of an evidence base to reduce the risk of workplace transport accidents (Contract research report). London, UK: Health and Safety Executive; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Rundmo T. Employee images of risk. J Risk Res. 2001;4:393–404.
   Google Scholar
• Renn O. The role of risk perception for risk management. Reliab Eng Syst Safety. 1998;59:49–62.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Risk management—vocabulary—guidelines for use in standards (ISO/IEC Guide No. 73:2002). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Weyman AK, Kelly CJ. Risk perception and risk communication: a review of the literature (Contract research report No. 248/1999). Buxton, UK: Health and Safety Laboratory; 1999. Retrieved November 3, 2009, from: http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/1999/crr99248.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg L, Drottz-Sjöberg B-M. Knowledge and risk perception among nuclear power plant employees. Risk Anal. 1991;11: 607–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg L. Factors in risk perception. Risk Anal. 2000;20:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Petts JP, McAlpine S, Homan J, Sadhra S, Pattison H, MacRae S. Development of a methodology to design and evaluate effective risk messages (Contract research report No. 400). London, UK: Health and Safety Executive; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres TJ, Wood CT, Schmidt RA, McCarthy RL. Risk perception and behavioral choice. Int J Cog Erg. 1998; 2:35–52.
   Google Scholar
• Cox P, Niewohner J, Pidgeon N, Gerrard S, Fischhoff B, Riley D. The use of mental models in chemical risk protection: developing a generic workplace methodology. Risk Anal. 2003;23:311–24.
   Google Scholar
• Rundmo T. Perceived risk, safety status, and job stress among injured and noninjured employees on offshore petroleum installations. J Safety Res. 1995;26:87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Flin R, Mearns K, Gordon R, Fleming M. Risk perception by offshore workers on UK oil and gas platforms. Saf Sci. 1996; 22:131–45.
   Google Scholar
• Mearns K, Flin R. Risk perception and attitudes to safety by personnel in the offshore oil and gas industry: A review. J Loss Prev Process Indust. 1995;8:299–305.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles DJ. Risk perception leading to risk taking behaviour amongst farmers in England and Wales (Contract research report 404/2002). London, UK: Health and Safety Executive; 2002. Retrieved November 3, 2009, from: http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/2002/crr02404.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stave C, Pousette A, Torner M. A model of the relations between risk perception and self-reported safety activity. Occup Ergon. 2006;6:35–45
   Google Scholar
• Zimolong B. Hazard perception and risk estimation in accident causation. In: Eberts RE, Eberts CG, editors. Trends in ergonomics/human factors II. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science; 1985. p. 463–470.
   Google Scholar
• Torner M, Eklof M. Risk perception among fishermen and control of risks through participatory analysis of accidents and incidents. In: Lincoln JM, Hudson DS, Conway GA, Pescatore R, editors. Proceedings of the International Fishing Industry Safety and Health Conference. Cincinnati, OH, USA: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2002. p. 237–41.
   Google Scholar
• Pollnac RB, Poggie JJ, Cabral SL Thresholds of danger: perceived risk in a New England fishery. Hum Organ. 1998; 57:53–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ostberg O. Risk perceptions and work behavior in forestry: implications for accident prevention policy. Acc Anal Prev. 1980;12:189–200.
   Google Scholar
• Weyman AK, Clarke DD. Investigating the influence of organisational role on perceptions of risk in deep coal mines. J Appl Psychol. 2003:88;404–12.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn JG.. Subjective and objective risk distribution. Occ Psychol. 1972;46:183–7.
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone LL. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol Rev. 1927;34:273–86.
   Google Scholar
• Flin R, Mearns K, O’Connor P, Bryden R. Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features. Saf Sci. 2000;34:177–92.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein ND. The precaution adoption process. Health Psychol. 1998:7;355–86.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald G. Risk perception. Civil Engineering. 2006; 159:51–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres T, Wood C, Schmidt R, Young D, Murray J. Affordance perception and safety intervention. In: Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, San Diego, California, USA. Santa Monica, CA, USA: Human Factors and Ergonomic Society; 2000. vol. 6, p. 51–4.
   Google Scholar
• Health and Safety Executive. The safe use of vehicles on construction sites: a guide for clients, designers, contractors, managers and workers involved with construction transport. sites (Health and Safety Guidance No. 144). Sudbury, Suffolk, UK: HSE Books; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Moutrie J. Safety of construction vehicles: a survey of accidents involving site dumpers. Issue 2 (internal report for Health and Safety Executive) [unpublished document]; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Sankoh AJ, Huque, MF, Dubey SD. Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustments methods in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1997;16:2529–42.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185:1127–31.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic P. The risk game. J Hazard Mater. 2001;86:17–24.
   Google Scholar