Identifying Training Deficiencies in Military Pilots by Applying the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System

References

• Branson RK, Rayner GT, Cox L, Furman JP, King FJ, Hannum WH. Interservice procedures for instructional systems development: executive summary and model. Tallahasee, FL, USA: Center for Educational Technology, Florida State University; 1975. Retrieved January 31, 2013, from: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a019488.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kirwan B, Ainsworth LK, editors. A guide to task analysis. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick J. Training. In: Tsang PS, Vidulich MA, editors. Principles and practice of aviation psychology. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Erlbaum; 2003. p. 397–434.
   Google Scholar
• Reason JT. Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Shappell SA, Wiegmann DA. A human error analysis of general aviation controlled flight into terrain accidents occurring between 1990–1998 (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-03/4). Washington, DC, USA: Federal Aviation Administration; 2003. Retrieved January 31, 2013, from: http://www.hf.faa.gov/docs/508/docs/cami/0304.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegmann DA, Shappell SA. A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: the human factors analysis and classification system. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegmann DA, Shappell SA. Human factors analysis of postaccident data: applying theoretical taxonomies of human error. Int J Av Psychol. 1997;7(1):67–81.
   Google Scholar
• Shappell SA, Wiegmann DA. The human factors analysis and classification system—HFACS (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-00/7). Washington DC, USA: Federal Aviation Administration; 2000 Retrieved January 31, 2013, from: http://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_documents/humanfactors_classAnly.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegmann DA, Shappell SA. Applying the human factors analysis and classification system to the analysis of commercial aviation accident data. In: Jensen RS, editor. Eleventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH, USA: Ohio State University; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegmann DA, Shappell SA. Human error perspectives in aviation. Int J Av Psychol. 2001;11(4):341–57.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegmann DA, Shappell SA. Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents: application of the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS). Aviat Space Environ Med. 2001;72(11):1006–16.
   Google Scholar
• Shappell SA, Wiegmann DA. Applying reason: the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS). Human Factors and Aerospace Safety. 2001;1(1): 59–86.
   Google Scholar
• Shappell SA, Wiegmann DA. HFACS analysis of military and civilian aviation accidents: a North American comparison. In: Proceedings of International Society of Air Safety Investigators, Australia, Queensland. Sterling, VA, USA. International Society of Air Safety Investigators; 2004. p. 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker SWA. The re-invention of human error. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety. 2001;1(1):247–66.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl A. The effectiveness of training programs for preventing aircrew error. In: Jensen RS, editor. Sixth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH, USA: Ohio State University; 1991. vol. 2, p. 640–55.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen RS. The boundaries of aviation psychology, human factors, aeronautical decision making, situation awareness, and crew resource management. Int J Av Psychol. 1994;7(4):259–67.
   Google Scholar
• Klein GA. Analysis of situation awareness from critical incident reports. In: Endsley MR, Garland DJ, editors. Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Erlbaum; 2000.p. 45–62.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl A. Human performance/system safety issues in aircraft accident investigation and prevention. In: Jensen RS, editor. Fifth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH, USA: Ohio State University; 1989. vol. 2, p. 838–47.
   Google Scholar
• Feggetter AJ. The development of an intelligent human factors data base as an aid for the investigation of aircraft accidents. In: Jensen RS, editor. Sixth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH, USA: Ohio State University; 1991.vol. 2, p. 324–9.
   Google Scholar
• Harle PG. investigation of human factors: the link to accident prevention. In: McDonald N, Johnston R, Fuller R, editors. Applications of psychology to the aviation system. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate; 1985. p. 101–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter DR, Baker RM. Reducing accidents among general aviation pilots through a national aviation safety program. In: Hayward BJ, Lowe AR, editors. The Fourth Australian Aviation Psychology Symposium. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate; 2000. vol. 1, p. 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Reason J. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA). Crew resource management—flight crew. Temporary guidance leaflet 5 (JAR-OPS). Administrative and guidance material (Section 4 – Operations). Hoofdorp, The Netherlands: JAA; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• van Avermaete JAG. NOTECHS: Nontechnical skill evaluation in JAR-FCL (NLR-TP-98518). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: National Aerospace Laboratory; 2008. Retrieved January 31, 2013, from: http://www.simulationaustralia.org.au/archive/simtect/2005/NOTECHS_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ikomi PA, Boehm-Davis D, Holt RW, Incalcaterra KA. Jump seat observations of advanced crew resource management (ACRM) Effectiveness. In: Jensen RS, Cox B, Callister JD, Lavis R, editors. Tenth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH, USA: Ohio State University; 1999. vol. 1, p. 292–7.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl A. The effectiveness of training programs for preventing aircrew error. In: Jensen RS, editor. Sixth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH, USA: Ohio State University; 1991. vol. 2, p. 640–55.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley MR. A survey of situation awareness requirements in air-to-air combat fighters. Int J Av Psychol. 1993; 3(2):157–68.
   Google Scholar
• Klein GA. A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In: Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE, editors. Decision making in action: models and methods. Norwood, NJ, USA: Ablex; 1993. p. 138–47.
   Google Scholar
• Klein G. The current status of the naturalistic decision making framework. In: Flin R, Salas E, Strub M, Martin L, editors. Decision making under stress: emerging themes and applications. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate; 1997. p. 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Li WC, Harris D. The evaluation of the effect of a short aeronautical decisionmaking training program for military pilots. Int J Av Psychol. 2008;18(2):135–52.
   Google Scholar
• Buch G, Diehl A. An investigation of the effectiveness of pilot judgment training. Hum Factors. 1984;26(5):557–64.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly TJ, Blackwell BB, Lester LF. A simulator-based approach to training in aeronautical decision making. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1989;60(1):50–2.
   Google Scholar
• Li WC, Harris D. Pilot error and its relationship with higher organizational levels: HFACS analysis of 523 accidents. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2006;77(10): 1056–61.
   Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.
   Google Scholar
• Gaur D. Human factors analysis and classification system applied to civil aircraft accidents in India. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005;76(5):501–5.
   Google Scholar
• Li WC, Harris D, Yu CS. Routes to failure: analysis of 41 civil aviation accidents from the Republic of China using the human factors analysis and classification system. Acc Anal Prev. 2008;40(2):426–34.
   Google Scholar
• International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Safety management manual. 2nd ed. (Document No. 9859, AN/474). Montreal, QC, Canada: ICAO; 2009. Retrieved January 31, 2013, from: http://www.icao.int/safety/ism/Guidance%20Materials/DOC_9859_FULL_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar