Examining the asymptote in safety progress: a literature review

References

• Townsend AS. Safety can't be measured. Farnham: Gower; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Graham B. Deep water: the Gulf oil disaster and the future of offshore drilling (Report to the President). Washington DC: National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Turner BA. Man-made disasters. London: Wykeham; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon NF, O'Leary M. Man-made disasters: why technology and organizations (sometimes) fail. Saf Sci. 2000;34(1–3):15–30. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00004-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker SWA. Drift into failure: from hunting broken components to understanding complex systems. Farnham: Ashgate; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hallowell MR, Gambatese JA. Construction safety risk mitigation. J Constr Eng Manage. 2009;135(12):1316–1323. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besnard D, Hollnagel E. I want to believe: some myths about the management of industrial safety. Cognition, Tech Work. 2014;16(1):13–23. doi:10.1007/s10111-012-0237-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber M, Roth G, Wittich C. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Elkind P, Whitford D. BP: ‘an accident waiting to happen’. Fortune Features. 2011;85:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Perrow C. Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. New York: Basic Books; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Saloniemi A, Oksanen H. Accidents and fatal accidents: some paradoxes. Saf Sci. 1998;29:59–66. 10.1016/S0925-7535(98)00016-2 doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(98)00016-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett A, Wang A. Passenger mortality risk estimates provide perspectives about flight safety. Flight Saf Digest. 2000;19(4):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Wright L, van der Schaaf T. Accident versus near miss causation: a critical review of the literature, an empirical test in the UK railway domain, and their implications for other sectors. J Hazard Mater. 2004;111(1–3):105–110. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins A. Management walk-arounds: lessons from the Gulf of Mexico oil well blowout. Saf Sci. 2011;49(10):1421 –1425. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu AW, Lipshutz AKM, Pronovost PJ. Effectiveness and efficiency of root cause analysis in medicine. JAMA. 2008;299(6):685–7. doi:10.1001/jama.299.6.685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright PC, McCarthy J. Analysis of procedure following as concerned work. In: Hollnagel E, editor. Handbook of cognitive task design. Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum; 2003. p. 679–700.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins A. Risk-management and rule-compliance: decision-making in hazardous industries. Saf Sci. 2010;49 (2):110–120. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2010.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee T, Harrison K. Assessing safety culture in nuclear power stations. Saf Sci. 2000;34:61–97. 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00007-2 doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00007-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthereau V, Hollnagel E. Planning, control, and adaptation: a case study. European Manage J. 2005;23(1):118–131. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.016
   Google Scholar
• Suchman LA. Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Degani A, Heymann M, Shafto M. Formal aspects of procedures: the problem of sequential correctness. 43rd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Houston (TX): Human Factors Society; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Reason JT. The human contribution: unsafe acts, accidents and heroic recoveries. Farnham: Ashgate; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker SWA. Follow the procedure or survive. Hum Fac Aerosp Saf. 2001;1(4):381–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E, Nemeth CP, Dekker SWA. Resilience engineering: preparation and restoration. Farnham: Ashgate; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington-Darby T, Wilson JR. The nature of expertise: a review. Appl Ergon. 2006;37:17–32. 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.09.001 doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltovich PJ, Ford KM, Hoffman RR. Expertise in context: human and machine. Menlo Park (CA): AAAI Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Milgram P, Doyle J. Capturing and modeling planning expertise in anesthesiology: results of a field study. In: Zsambok C, Klein G, editors. Naturalistic decision making. Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum; 1997. p. 197–205.
   Google Scholar
• Dismukes K, Berman BA, Loukopoulos LD. The limits of expertise: rethinking pilot error and the causes of airline accidents. Farnham: Ashgate; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Grote G. Safety management in different high-risk domains: all the same? Saf Sci. 2012;50(10):1983–1992. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes J. Use of safety barriers in operational safety decision making. Saf Sci. 2012;50(3):424–432. 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.10.002 doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff S. Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis. Risk Anal. 1993;13(2):123–129. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01057.x doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01057.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leveson NG. Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety. Engineering Systems. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke L and Perrow C. Prosaic organizational failure. American Behav Scientist. 1996;39(8):1040–1056. doi:10.1177/0002764296039008008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick J, Lessin N. The rise of behavioural-based safety programmes. Multinational Monitor. 2000;21:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Woods DD. Behind human error. Farnham: Ashgate; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham JC. Accident prone: a history of technology, psychology and misfits of the machine age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Reason JT. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Farnham: Ashgate; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Gray GC. The Responsibilization Strategy of Health and Safety: Neo-liberalism and the Reconfiguration of Individual Responsibility for Risk. British J Criminol. 2009;49:326–342. doi:10.1093/bjc/azp004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldenmund FW. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Saf Sci. 2000;34:215–257. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00014-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker JA. The report of the BP U.S. refineries independent safety review panel. Washington, DC: Baker Panel; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• CAIB, Report Volume 1, August 2003. Washington, DC: Columbia Accident Investigation Board; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method: CREAM. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• GAO. Workplace safety and health: better OSHA guidance needed on safety incentive programs (Report to Congressional Requesters). Washington DC: Government Accountability Office; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Zwetsloot GIJM, Wybo J-L, Saari J, et al. The case for research into the zero accident vision. Saf Sci. 2013;58:41–48. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson C. Zero harm: infallible or ineffectual. Saf Inst of Australia OHS Professional. 2013;28:22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Downer J. Disowning Fukushima: managing the credibility of nuclear reliability assessment in the wake of disaster. Regul Governance. 2013;7(4):1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan D. The challenger launch decision: risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Starbuck WH, Milliken FJ. Challenger: fine-tuning the odds until something breaks. J Manage Stud. 1988;25(4):319–340. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00040.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM. Managing the unexpected: resilient performance in an age of uncertainty. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Feynman RP. “What do you care what other people think?”: further adventures of a curious character. New York: Norton; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Amalberti R. The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems. Saf Sci. 2001;37(2–3):109–126. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00045-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E, Nemeth CP, Dekker SWA. Resilience engineering: remaining sensitive to the possibility of failure. Farnham: Ashgate; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gawande A. The checklist manifesto: how to get things right. New York: Metropolitan Books; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Weick KE. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster. Adm Sci Q. 1993;38(4):628–652. doi:10.2307/2393339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson NG. Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker SWA. Just culture: balancing safety and accountability. Farnham: Ashgate; 2012.
   Google Scholar