Anthropometric hand dimensions in a population of Iranian male workers in 2012

References

• Kunelius A, Darzins S, Cromie J, et al. Development of normative data for hand strength and anthropometric dimensions in a population of automotive workers. Work: J Prev Assess Rehabil. 2007;28(3):267–78.
   Google Scholar
• Del Prado-Lu, JL. Anthropometric measurement of Filipino manufacturing workers. Int J Ind Ergon. 2007;37(6):497–503. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2007.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang S, Johnson PW, editors. Computer input devices – race and gender: is there a mismatch between anthropometry and input device design. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting; 2010: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tichauer E, Gage H. Ergonomic principles basic to hand tool design. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1977;38(11):622–634. doi:10.1080/00028897708984406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan V, Yeow PH. Hand anthropometry and SMS satisfaction. J Appl Sci. 2008;8:816–822. 10.3923/jas.2008.816.822 doi: 10.3923/jas.2008.816.822
   Google Scholar
• Fraser A, Vallow J, Preston A, et al. Predicting ‘normal’ grip strength for rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatology. 1999;38(6):521–528. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/38.6.521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visnapuu M, Jürimäe T. The influence of basic body and hand anthropometry on the results of different throwing tests in young handball and basketball players. Anthropol Anz. 2008;66(2):225–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashidlamir AEAA, Godarzi M, Saadatnia A. The investigation of a possible relationship between specific hand dimensions and handgrip strength in preadolescent trained male swimmers. Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche. 2012 August;171; 4:453–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kothiyal K, Tettey S. Anthropometric data of elderly people in Australia. Appl Ergon. 2000;31(3):329–332. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00052-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrhan SN, Sarder M, Mandahawi N. Hand anthropometry in Bangladeshis living in America and comparisons with other populations. Ergonomics. 2009;52(8):987–998. doi:10.1080/00140130902792478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung HS, Jung H-S. Hand anthropometry of Koreans: measurement and relationships of hand dimensions. Asian J Ergon. 2005;6:41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Mandahawi N, Imrhan S, Al-Shobaki S, et al. Hand anthropometry survey for the Jordanian population. Int J Ind Ergon. 2008;38(11):966–976. 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.01.010 doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismaila S. Anthropometric data of hand, foot and ear of University Students in Nigeria. Leonardo J Sci. 2009;8(15):15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Dewangan K, Owary C, Datta R. Anthropometric data of female farm workers from north eastern India and design of hand tools of the hilly region. Int J Ind Ergon. 2008;38(1):90–100. 10.1016/j.ergon.2007.09.004 doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2007.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali İ, Arslan N. Estimated anthropometric measurements of Turkish adults and effects of age and geographical regions. Int J Ind Ergon. 2009;39(5):860–865. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2009.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobzova J, Vignerova J, Blaha P, et al. The 6th nationwide anthropological survey of children and adolescents in the Czech Republic in 2001. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2004;12(3):126–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kennedy SJ. Anthropometric survey of the imperial Iranian armed forces. Phase III. Technical summary. Ft. Belvoir: Defense Technical Information Center; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Mououdi M, Choobineh A. Static anthropometric characteristics of students age range six-11 in Mazandaran province/Iran and school furniture design based on ergonomics principles. Appl Ergon. 1997;28(2):145–147. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(95)00059-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrparvar AHM, Mostaghaci M, Mirmohammadi SJet al,. An assessment of the anthropometric data of Iranian University Students. Int J Occup Hyg. 2006;3(2):85–9.
   Google Scholar
• Dianat I, Karimi MA, Hashemi AA, et al. Classroom furniture and anthropometric characteristics of Iranian high school students: proposed dimensions based on anthropometric data. Appl Ergon. 2013;44:101–108. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kar SK, Ghosh S, Manna I, et al. An investigation of hand anthropometry of agricultural workers. J Hum Ergol. 2003;14(1):57–62.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra A, Chandna P, Deswal S. Analysis of hand anthropometric dimensions of male industrial workers of Haryana state. Int J Eng. 2011;5:242–256.
   Google Scholar
• Cakit E, Durgun B, Cetik O, et al. A Survey of Hand Anthropometry and Biomechanical Measurements of Dentistry Students in Turkey. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf. 2014;24:739–753. doi: 10.1002/hfm.20401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrhan SN, Nguyen M-T, Nguyen N-N. Hand anthropometry of Americans of Vietnamese origin. Int J Ind Ergon. 1993;12(4):281–287. 10.1016/0169-8141(93)90098-X doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(93)90098-X
   Google Scholar