Non-powered hand tool improvement research for prevention of work-related problems: a review

References

• National Research Council (NRC). Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace: low back and upper extremities. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Mital A. Hand tools: injuries, illness, design, and usage. In: Mital A, Karwowski E, editors. Workspace, equipment and tool design. New York (NY): Elsevier; 1991. p. 219–256.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics [Internet]. United States: occupational injuries and illnesses: counts, rates, and characteristics; 2004. Updated 2004 November 6 [cited 2016 April 25]. Available from: https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshbulletin2004.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kilbom A, Makarainen M, Sperling L, et al. Tool design, user characteristics and performance: a case study on plate-shears. Appl Ergon. 1993;24(3):221–230. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(93)90010-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nejad NH, Choobineh A, Rahimifard H, et al. Musculoskeletal risk assessment in small furniture manufacturing workshops. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2013;19(2):275–284. doi:doi: 10.1080/10803548.2013.11076985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijt-Evers LFM, Groenesteijn L, de Looze MP, et al. Identifying factors of comfort in using hand tools. Appl Ergon. 2004;35(5):453–458. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das B, Jongkol P, Ngui S. Snap-on-handles for a non-powered hacksaw: an ergonomics evaluation, redesign and testing. Ergonomics. 2005;48(1):78–97. doi: 10.1080/00140130410001686366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsot J. QFD: a methodological tool for integration of ergonomics at the design stage. Appl Ergon. 2005;36(2):185–192. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motamedzade M, Choobineh A, Mououdi MA, et al. Ergonomic design of carpet weaving hand tools. Int J Ind Ergon. 2007;37(7):581–587. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2007.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dianat I, Nedaei M, Mostashar Nezami MA. The effects of tool handle shape on hand performance, usability and discomfort using masons’ trowels. Int J Ind Ergon. 2015;45:13–20. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2014.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mital A, Kilbom A. Design, selection and use of hand tools to alleviate trauma of the upper extremities: part I – guidelines for the practitioner. Int J Ind Ergon. 1992;10(1):1–5. doi:doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(92)90042-X
   Google Scholar
• Mital A, Kilbom A. Design, selection and use of hand tools to alleviate trauma of the upper extremities: part II – the scientific basis (knowledge base) for the guide. Int J Ind Ergon. 1992;10(1):7–21. doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(92)90043-Y
   Google Scholar
• Dababneh A, Lowe B, Krieg E, et al. A checklist for the ergonomic evaluation of nonpowered hand tools. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004;1(12):D135–D145. doi: 10.1080/15459620490883150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdani A, Neumann WP, Imbeau D, et al. Prevention of musculoskeletal disorders within management systems: a scoping review of practices, approaches, and techniques. Appl Ergon. 2015;51:255–262. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mital A. Effect of body posture and common hand tools on peak torque exertion capabilities. Appl Ergon. 1986;17(2):87–96. doi:doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(86)90245-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marras WS, Rockwell TH. An experimental evaluation of method and tool effects in spike maul use. Hum Factors. 1986;28(3):267–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu S-H, Chen Y-H. Evaluation of bent-handled files. Int J Ind Ergon. 2000;25(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(98)00071-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey PG, McGorry RW. Investigation of a pork shoulder deboning operation. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004;1(3):167–172. doi:doi: 10.1080/15459620490424465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey PG, McGorry RW, O’Brien NV. The effects of work height, workpiece orientation, gender, and screwdriver type on productivity and wrist deviation. Int J Ind Ergon. 2004;33(4):339–346. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2003.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anton D, Gerr F, Meyers A, et al. Effect of aviation snip design and task height on upper extremity muscular activity and wrist posture. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007;4(2):99–113. doi:doi: 10.1080/15459620601117087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirka GA, Jin S, Hoyle J. An evaluation of arborist handsaws. Appl Ergon. 2009;40(1):8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeleye AA, Akanbi OG. Hand cumulative trauma disorders in Nigerian custom tailors: the need for redesign of manual scissors. Ergonomics. 2015;58(8):1410–1423. doi:doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1012123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MW, Yun MH, Lee JS. High touch – human factors in new product design. Proc Hum Fact Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 1995;40(1):401–405.
   Google Scholar
• Lee MW, Yun MH, Jung ES, et al. High touch: ergonomics in a conceptual design process – case studies of a remote controller and personal telephones. Int J Ind Ergon. 1997;19(3):239–248. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(95)00110-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nag PK, Goswami A, Ashtekar SP, et al. Ergonomics in sickle operation. Appl Ergon. 1988;19(3):233–239. doi:doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(88)90142-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutjana DP. Use of serrated sickle to increase farmers' productivity. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 2000;29(1/2):1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swangnetr M, Kaber D, Phimphasak C, et al. The influence of rice plow handle design and whole-body posture on grip force and upper-extremity muscle activation. Ergonomics. 2014;57(10):1526–1535. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.934301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellows GL, Freivalds A. Ergonomics evaluation of a foam rubber grip for tool handles. Appl Ergon. 1991;22(4):225–230. doi:doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(91)90225-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rok Chang S, Park S, Freivalds A. Ergonomic evaluation of the effects of handle types on garden tools. Int J Ind Ergon. 1999;24(1):99–105. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(98)00091-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahao RF, Gonzaga MC, Braunbeck OA. Protective gloves on manual sugar cane cutting are really effective? Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:4963–4966.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gite LP. Optimum handle height for animal-drawn mould board plough. Appl Ergon. 1991;22(1):21–28. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(91)90005-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderwal L, Rautiainen R, Kuye R, et al. Evaluation of long- and short-handled hand hoes for land preparation, developed in a participatory manner among women vegetable farmers in The Gambia. Appl Ergon. 2011;42(5):749–756. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah R, Kalita M. Ergonomic evaluation of pounding of rice with traditional tool. Work. 2012;43(4):411–416.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khidiya MS, Bhardwaj A. An ergonomic approach to design hand tool for agricultural production. Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:1335–1341.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kishtwaria J, Rana A. Intervention of gender friendly land preparation technologies for drudgery reduction of hill farm women. Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:4342–4348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mehta M, Gandhi S, Dilbaghi M. Intervention of drudgery reducing technologies in agriculture and impact evaluation. Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:5003–5008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paivinen M, Heinimaa T. The effects of different hand tool blade coatings on force demands when cutting wood. Int J Ind Ergon. 2003;32(3):139–146. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(03)00047-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivinen M, Heinimaa T. The usability and ergonomics of axes. Appl Ergon. 2009;40(4):790–796. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis J, Narayan CV. Design and sizing of ergonomic handles for hand tools. Appl Ergon. 1993;24(5):351–356. doi:doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(93)90074-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser H, Wang B, Hoffman A. Electromyographic and subjective evaluation of hand tools: the example of masons’ trowels. Int J Ind Ergon. 1996;18(1):91–106. doi:doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(94)00114-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oster J, Kadefors R, Wikstrom L, et al. An ergonomic study on plate shears, applying physical, physiological and psychophysical methods. Int J Ind Ergon. 1994;14(4):349–364. doi:doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(94)90023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li KW. Ergonomic design and evaluation of wire-tying hand tools. Int J Ind Ergon. 2002;30(3):149–161. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00097-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikhout SM, Bronkhorst RE, van der Grinten MP. Evaluation of a new scraper. Proc Hum Fact Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2001;45(7):722–726. doi: 10.1177/154193120104500710
   Google Scholar
• Rosati PM, Chopp JN, Dickerson CR. Investigating shoulder muscle loading and exerted forces during wall painting tasks: influence of gender, work height and paint tool design. Appl Ergon. 2014;45(4):1133–1139. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenesteijn L, Eikhout SM, Vink P. One set of pliers for more tasks in installation work: the effects on (dis)comfort and productivity. Appl Ergon. 2004;35(5):485–492. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridger RS, Cabion N, Goedecke J, et al. Physiological and subjective measures of workload when shovelling with a conventional and two-handled (‘levered’) shovel. Ergonomics. 1997;40(11):1212–1219. doi: 10.1080/001401397187450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGorry RW. A system for the measurement of grip forces and applied moments during hand tool use. Appl Ergon. 2001;32(3):271–279. doi:doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(00)00062-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGorry RW, Dowd PC, Dempsey PG. Cutting moments and grip forces in meat cutting operations and the effect of knife sharpness. Appl Ergon. 2003;34(4):375–382. doi:doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00041-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabo RL, Radwin RG, Henderson CJ. The influence of knife dullness on poultry processing operator exertions and the effectiveness of periodic knife steeling. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 2001;62(4):428–433.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran DJ, Howe DR, Riley MW. An evaluation of commercially available plastic handled knife handles. Proc Hum Fact Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 1985;29(8):802–806. doi:doi: 10.1177/154193128502900818
   Google Scholar
• Nag PK, Nag A. Hazards and health complaints associated with fish processing activities in India – evaluation of a low-cost intervention. Int J Ind Ergon. 2007;37(2):125–132. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2006.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CA, Mirka GA, Myers KA. Ergonomic hand tool interventions for the furniture manufacturing industry. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meeting. 2000;44(29):5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Leamon TB, Dempsey PG. The unusual congruence between subjective evaluations and losses associated with inadequate hand tool design. Int J Ind Ergon. 1995;16(1):23–28. doi:doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(94)00069-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung M-C, Hallbeck MS. Ergonomic redesign and evaluation of a clamping tool handle. Appl Ergon. 2005;36(5):619–624. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You H, Kumar A, Young R, et al. An ergonomic evaluation of manual Cleco plier designs: effects of rubber grip, spring recoil, and worksurface angle. Appl Ergon. 2005;36(5):575–583. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey PG, McGorry RW, Leamon TB, et al. Bending the tool and the effect on human performance: further investigation of a simulated wire-twisting task. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 2002;63(5):586–593. doi:doi: 10.1080/15428110208984744
   Google Scholar
• Hsu S-H, Wu S-P. An investigation for determining the optimum length of chopsticks. Appl Ergon. 1991;22(6):395–400. doi:doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(91)90082-S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan T. A study for determining the optimum diameter of chopsticks. Int J Ind Ergon. 1999;23(1):101–105. doi:doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00105-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S-P, Hsieh C-S. Ergonomics study on the handle length and lift angle for the culinary spatula. Appl Ergon. 2002;33(5):493–501. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00024-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mital A, Sanghavi N. Comparison of maximum volitional torque exertion capabilities of males and females using common hand tools. Hum Factors. 1986;28(3):283–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mital A, Channaveeraiah C. Peak volitional torques for wrenches and screwdrivers. Int J Ind Ergon. 1988;3(1):41–64. doi:doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(88)90006-6
   Google Scholar
• Kadefors R, Areskoug A, Dahlman S, et al. An approach to ergonomics evaluation of hand tools. Appl Ergon. 1993;24(3):203–211. doi:doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(93)90008-W
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mital A, Kuo T, Faard HF. A quantitative evaluation of gloves used with non-powered hand tools in routine maintenance tasks. Ergonomics. 1994;37(2):333–343. doi:doi: 10.1080/00140139408963650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habes DJ, Grant AK. An electromyographic study of maximum torques and upper extremity muscle activity in simulated screwdriving tasks. Int J Ind Ergon. 1997;20(4):339–346. doi:doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00069-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall C. External pressure at the hand during object handling and work with tools. Int J Ind Ergon. 1997;20(3):191–206. doi:doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00056-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vink P, van Eijk DJ. The effect of a participative product design process on user performance. Saf Sci. 2007;45(5):567–577. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimomura Y, Shirakawa H, Sekine M, et al. Ergonomic design and evaluation of new surgical scissors. Ergonomics. 2015;58(11):1878–1884. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1037362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Labor [Internet]. North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) at BLS. Washington (DC): US Department of Labor; 2002. Updated 2016 December 12 [cited 2016 December 30]. Available from: http://www.bls.gov/bls/naics.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Meena ML, Dangayach GS. Analysis of employee satisfaction in banking sector. Int J Humanit Appl Sci. 2012;1(2):78–81.
   Google Scholar
• Jain R, Gupta S, Meena ML, et al. Optimisation of labour productivity using work measurement techniques. Int J Productivity Qual Manag. 2016;19(4):485–510. doi:doi: 10.1504/IJPQM.2016.080154
   Google Scholar
• Meena ML, Dangayach GS, Bhardwaj A. Measuring quality of work life among workers in handicraft industries of Jaipur. Int J Ind Syst Eng. 2014a;17(3):376–390.
   Google Scholar
• Meena ML, Dangayach GS, Bhardwaj A. Investigating ergonomic issues among workers in hand block textile printing industries. Int J Bus Syst Res. 2014;8(4):392–401. doi:doi: 10.1504/IJBSR.2014.065014
   Google Scholar
• Parida R, Ray PK. A comprehensive framework for physical evaluation of manual material handling tasks. Int J Manuf Tech Manag. 2011;24(1–4):153–66.
   Google Scholar
• Quintana R, Hernandez-Masser V. Limiting design criteria framework for manual electronics assembly. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf. 2003;13(2):165–179. doi: 10.1002/hfm.10033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Zhang W, Fu H, et al. A framework for interactive work design based on motion tracking, simulation, and analysis. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf. 2010;20(4): 339–352. doi:doi: 10.1002/hfm.20178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain R, Meena ML, Dangayach GS. Need of agriculture hand tool design using quality and ergonomics principles. In: Mandal DK, Syan CS, editors. CAD/CAM, robotics and factories of the future. India: Springer India; 2016. p. 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey PG. Utilizing criteria for assessing multiple-task manual materials handling jobs. Int J Ind Ergon. 1999;24(4):405–416. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00007-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongers PM, Ijmker S, van den Huevel, et al. Epidemiology of work related neck and upper limb problems: psychosocial and personal risk factors (part I) and effective interventions from a bio behavioural perspective (part II). J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(3):272–295. doi: 10.1007/s10926-006-9044-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsh B-T, Moro FB, Smith MJ. The efficacy of workplace ergonomic interventions to control musculoskeletal disorders: a critical analysis of the peer-reviewed literature. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2001;2(1):23–96. doi: 10.1080/14639220152644533
   Google Scholar
• Karsh B-T. Theories of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: implications for ergonomic interventions. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2006;7(1):71–88. doi: 10.1080/14639220512331335160
   Google Scholar